Trump Burns 500 Tons of Food Meant for the Hungry

[FreeinChrist]

Sorry you feel the solution to your problem is "non-responsive."
That solution is as good as it gets in a republic.

You can look that up as well as I can.

Wow - twisting and squirming there?

I had already looked it up -see post #119

YOU claimed that most approve of Trump's policies. Back it up or admit that most are not approving of his policies.

There are more than a few folks who voted for Trump who are now saying that this wasn't what they voted for.

 

[Larniavc]

What law of the land (not whose personal morality) was broken?

Would you retain that sentiment if there is a law you happen to object to based wholly on personal morals?

 

[Clare73]

Wow - twisting and squirming there?

I had already looked it up -see post #119

YOU claimed that most approve of Trump's policies. Back it up or admit that most are not approving of his policies.
There are more than a few folks who voted for Trump who are now saying that this wasn't what they voted for.

Then they get to vote his party out.

That's as good as it gets in a free country.

 

[Always in His Presence]

Interesting to catch propaganda from media not worth my time. Thanks.

Because it shows the reality that your propaganda doesn’t?

Where is the compassion for the children?

 

[Clare73]

Would you retain that sentiment if there is a law you happen to object to based wholly on personal morals?

It's not "sentiment," it's legal fact.

I try to deal in realities rather than wishes, and to exercise my right to vote in a pluralistic society where I don't get everything I believe in or want.

 

[BCP1928]

The voters had their say when they put them in office.

Everything else is just sounding brass and tinkling cymbal.

Is that what you think of Constitutional limits to Presidential authority?

 

[FreeinChrist]

Then they get to vote his party out.

That's as good as it gets in a free country.

And people can protest and make their view known....and those in power will get the message eventually.

But this little diversion does not address the OP.

 

[Clare73]

Is that what you think of Constitutional limits to Presidential authority?

No more than you do. . .

 

[FreeinChrist]

Because it shows the reality that your propaganda doesn’t?

Where is the compassion for the children?

That is a question to ask those that support letting the food we paid for sit and go bad and get burned rather than distribute it as was originally planned.

 

[BCP1928]

Talk is cheap. . .that is simply assertion until it is legally demonstrated to a Court.

I was asking of you think such Constitutional limits exist.

 

[FreeinChrist]

The voters had their say when they put them in office.

Everything else is just sounding brass and tinkling cymbal.

No, everything else is the will of the public which can affect how congress votes if they are persistent.

 

[Clare73]

I was asking of you think such Constitutional limits exist.

Do you?

 

[BCP1928]

Do you?

Of course. The power to enforce them rests with Congress.

 

[Clare73]

Of course. The power to enforce them rests with Congress.

Actually, the decision rests with the Court.

 

[BCP1928]

Actually, the decision rests with the Court.

No, since the ultimate power to remove the President from office resides with Congress, without reference to a court.

 

[Hentenza]

No, since the ultimate power to remove the President from office resides with Congress, without reference to a court.

Or with the people.

 

[Clare73]

No, since the ultimate power to remove the President from office resides with Congress, without reference to a court.

However, it requires a 2/3 majority of the Senate for removal.

 

[BCP1928]

However, it requires a 2/3 majority of the Senate for removal.

Great! It shows that you have at least read the document.

 

[Clare73]

Or with the people.

Which is done by Congress.

Keeping in mind that the people don't directly remove from office. . .time, Congress or the law do. . .the people directly put in office.

 

[Clare73]

Great! It shows that you have at least read the document.

Are you sure about that?