• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Do the Ten Commandments still apply under the new covenant today?

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
12,998
5,456
USA
✟682,542.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
So, the paradigm you are living under is 1) be re-created in God's image, 2) try your best to not slip and fall, 3) if you do slip and fall, then restart the sequence at number 1) again? Is there ever a time when the re-creation in God's image results in no slips and falls? Or is there ever a time that slips and falls pay the wage of eternal death?
I am going to refer you to this post I made earlier. You don't seem to understand what happens when we confess and repent, when we are truly sorry for sinning and breaking God's law. Our slate it wiped clean. I also beleive as stated more than once that through the power of Jesus we can overcome sin, its a promise of Scripture.

What I do not beleive , even though we can convince ourselves that we do not sin because we believe in God and believe we are in Him, yet breaking God's law and some how convinced ourselves because we have accepted Christ means when we break God's law its no longer sin. I think this is a deception Pro 28:13 Heb 10:26-30. God gives us the solution, its up to us take Him up on the solution.

 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
12,998
5,456
USA
✟682,542.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Ok. We love in order to authentically keep the commandments (among other good fruit produced by love). That’s the difference between the righteousness that comes from God on the basis of faith and a righteous of my own that comes from the law, Phil 3:9.
The law Paul is referring to is circumcision, not the Ten Commandments - God is enabling us to keep God's law the way God said which is righteous Psa 119:172 and our obedience to Him leads to our righteousness, sin leads us down the wrong path Rom 6:16

Here the context in Phil 3 regarding the law Paul is referring to

Phil 3:2 Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the mutilation! 3 For we are the circumcision, who worship [a]God in the Spirit, rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh, 4 though I also might have confidence in the flesh. If anyone else thinks he may have confidence in the flesh, I more so: 5 circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee; 6 concerning zeal, persecuting the church; concerning the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.7 But what things were gain to me, these I have counted loss for Christ. 8 Yet indeed I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as rubbish, that I may gain Christ 9 and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith

It was the same thing he was correcting in many passages that the Jews thought they could save themselves by being circumcised and no longer needed Jesus. Acts 15:1 Gal 2:3

Our righteousness does come by faith, but pray tell how one has faith in Jesus but not faith to do what He asks of us.
 
Upvote 0

Clare73

Blood-bought
Jun 12, 2012
28,483
7,317
North Carolina
✟335,963.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Ok, than answer me this, if we have laid aside the commandment of God as Jesus quoted from the Ten Commandments Mark 7:7-13 how can one be keeping them in James 2:11-12
See Ro 13:10.
 
Upvote 0

JesusFollowerForever

Disciple of Jesus
Jan 19, 2024
1,249
835
quebec
✟72,205.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Yes, your focus is on the 10 Commandments, but you are also asking if they apply under the New Covenant? So I'm answering this question by stating that they are not part of the New Covenant, but part of the OT Law. They are, in my view, part of the Old Covenant, and as I define the Old Covenant, it includes both the 10 Commandments and the entire Law.

The 10 Commandments were indeed called "the Covenant," but in being called that it was not intended to be the exclusive material called "the Covenant." We *know that* because Moses explained that this Covenant also required fully keeping the *entire Law,* as well as recognizing the ammendments that went with it.

Perhaps you wish to ask the question in such a way that you only accept terms as you define them? If so, I don't think the question is for just anybody to answer--just for those you feel use your definitions. But my answer would *not* use your definition, specifically with the assumption that "the Covenant" is exclusively the 10 Commandments.

No, see above. We define "the Covenant" differently. This is *not* a "diversion."

I've said many times that when the Temporal Laws of Temple, Priest, and Sacrifice are stripped away, along with all that aniticipates a future Salvation in Christ, what you have left is the original command of God to "live in God's image, after His likeness."

That is how God defined it--that is not an evasion! It is a Moral Law, as is commonly referred to in Church Theology--that is not an evasion! It requires Faith to know who God is, and what Moral Law is associated with living in Him.

Cain did not require a Law prohibiting Murder to know it was wrong to murder his brother. He knew by faith in God, and by association with Him, that it was morally wrong to abuse others. But God gave it to him anyway because he needed the law spelled out for him, being that he seemed to avoid recognizing that.

There is a Moral element in all of God's laws because Israel set an example under that system of *doing what God said to do.* Morality requires obedience under whatever system God has currently in place. What system God currently has in place is a matter of Faith and a matter of recognizing what He has done in instituting a new system after the Law.

In the NT system, God requires Christians to direct all of their moral applications to "God's likeness" in Christ's example. He lived under the Law but was separate from the Law, ie the Law did not apply to him except as a reference to his Salvation. We saw his obedience under the Law, but we also saw that he fulfilled the Law.

God was therefore recognizable by Faith in our observance of Christ and his moral example. We saw in him the likeness of God, and thus developed our "Moral Law," which calls for us to live like God in the example of Christ.

So, if you're looking for a list of rules, they are not, like the Law, anticipating the need for a future Salvation. They are based on the fact Christ has already done the work of Salvation, and legal perfection is no longer to be recognized as prohibitive in the Salvation of the Church.

There is therefore no more need for laws to redeem us from legal disqualification. We simply live like Jesus lived, as he represented God's image and likeness.

You have to recognize in his example the God who he represented. And you have to see, by Faith, how his example related to the Law in terms of its Morality. It means we abide by many of the principles of the 10 Commandments, as well as by the example of obedience to God Jesus demonstrated. We do not lust or covet, violate the rights of others, or seek any example of religious life apart from the example Jesus set. And so, we are called to fidelity to his moral example.

This requires Faith that Christ is the Messiah of Israel and originator of the Law of Moses. It is how he fulfilled its moral quality and ended the need for rules of redemption that determines the system of morality we live under.

When Jesus told the man who was still under the system of Law that Salvation comes by obeyiing the rules of the Law he was not stating that those laws liberated him from the need for redemption. The Law was always meant to lead Israel, in obedience, towards ultimate Salvation through Christ.

Now that the Law has been fulfilled, there is only need to abide in the example Christ set, being separate from the Law and yet the heart of its moral structure. This means that we simply follow after God's image and likeness, and strip away the things that are no longer needed that represented obstacles to our Salvation.

This may be an undesirable task for you, but for most Christians in history reading the Scriptures, both OT and NT, and joining that to our experience of Faith has been sufficient to encode moral and spiritual laws on our conscience. Who God is shines through in whatever Covenant we read because He is always perceivable by Faith. The material we read is simply a "legal transparency" under which we perceive God's moral likeness.
To the One Who Twists the Covenant and Rejects the Commandments of God

You speak boldly, but not with understanding. You say the Ten Commandments are not part of the New Covenant, but you show that you neither know the Scriptures nor the power of God. You confuse the Word and lead others into error, showing a heart that is not humble, but hardened against the truth that Jesus plainly taught.

You dishonor the words of Jesus—the very One you claim to follow.

When He was asked, “What must I do to inherit eternal life?”—Jesus did not speak in riddles or vague ideas about moral likeness or abstract faith. He said clearly:
“If you want to enter into life, keep the commandments.” (Matthew 19:17, NKJV)

Not just any commandments. He named them—from the Ten Commandments: “You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal…” and so on. These are not vague spiritual impressions—they are clear, written laws, etched in stone by the very finger of God (Exodus 31:18).

Jesus Himself said:
“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled.” (Matthew 5:17–18, NKJV)
Have heaven and earth passed away? No? Then neither have God’s commandments.

You talk of “a new system” as if God changes like shifting shadows. But the LORD said:
“For I am the LORD, I do not change.” (Malachi 3:6, NKJV)

The New Covenant was not made to abolish the Ten Commandments, but to write them on the heart.
“But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put My law in their minds, and write it on their hearts.” (Jeremiah 31:33, quoted also in Hebrews 8:10)
Which law? Not the laws of the Levites, not the temple rituals, but the very law that God gave His people from Sinai—the Ten Commandments, which He called “My covenant” (Exodus 34:28).

You talk of faith, but what is faith if it leads to lawlessness?
“Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven.” (Matthew 7:21)
“Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven.” (Matthew 5:19)

You say Jesus lived “separate from the law,” but this is a lie. He lived in full obedience to His Father’s law, and He said:
“I have kept My Father’s commandments and abide in His love.” (John 15:10)

You dishonor that love when you separate it from obedience.

You try to mix truth with your own ideas—"moral likeness," "church theology," "faith conscience"—but none of these can replace the Word of God, which was made flesh and dwelt among us, and which never contradicts the commandments of God.

If you say we do not need to obey the Ten Commandments under the New Covenant, then you lie against the very One who gave them. Jesus never once said to stop keeping the Sabbath, to stop honoring your father and mother, or that it is now okay to steal, lie, or commit adultery. Rather, He made the law even deeper by applying it to the heart (see Matthew 5–7).

You confuse grace with lawlessness.
Jesus did not die to make sin acceptable—He died to save us from sin.
“You shall call His name JESUS, for He will save His people from their sins.” (Matthew 1:21)

And what is sin?
“Sin is lawlessness.” (1 John 3:4)
Do not be like those who hear the Word but twist it because their hearts are not right.

The LORD said:
“This people honors Me with their lips, but their heart is far from Me. And in vain they worship Me, teaching as doctrines the commandments of men.” (Matthew 15:8–9)

You are warned. Stop resisting the truth. Return to the simple words of Jesus. Keep the commandments of God and the faith of Jesus (Revelation 14:12). For on the last day, no clever theology, no word games, no redefinitions will stand. Only the truth.

“Blessed are those who do His commandments, that they may have the right to the tree of life.” (Revelation 22:14, NKJV)

Repent, before it is too late.
 
Upvote 0

fhansen

Oldbie
Sep 3, 2011
15,589
3,895
✟378,320.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
The law Paul is referring to is circumcision, not the Ten Commandments - God is enabling us to keep God's law the way God said which is righteous Psa 119:172 and our obedience to Him leads to our righteousness, sin leads us down the wrong path Rom 6:16

Here the context in Phil 3 regarding the law Paul is referring to

Phil 3:2 Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the mutilation! 3 For we are the circumcision, who worship [a]God in the Spirit, rejoice in Christ Jesus, and have no confidence in the flesh, 4 though I also might have confidence in the flesh. If anyone else thinks he may have confidence in the flesh, I more so: 5 circumcised the eighth day, of the stock of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, a Hebrew of the Hebrews; concerning the law, a Pharisee; 6 concerning zeal, persecuting the church; concerning the righteousness which is in the law, blameless.7 But what things were gain to me, these I have counted loss for Christ. 8 Yet indeed I also count all things loss for the excellence of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord, for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and count them as rubbish, that I may gain Christ 9 and be found in Him, not having my own righteousness, which is from the law, but that which is through faith in Christ, the righteousness which is from God by faith

It was the same thing he was correcting in many passages that the Jews thought they could save themselves by being circumcised and no longer needed Jesus. Acts 15:1 Gal 2:3

Our righteousness does come by faith, but pray tell how one has faith in Jesus but not faith to do what He asks of us.
Whether Paul was speaking of the ceremonial law or the moral law (and he was referring to both in Phil 3) or any other law, his assertion throughout is that the law, good and right as it is, cannot justify us, including, as you know, the moral law as per Rom 7. This should be especially obvious when considering circumcision, thinking that the removal of a little piece of flesh can actually make one holy, but it’s equally true of the commandments; the mere external observance of the law does not make one holy either. And that was the problem with the Pharisees: they may’ve been clean on the outside but were still filthy on the inside-regardless of outside behavior, IOW. I can refrain from adultery or murder and still have lust and anger in my heart.

But if I love, even if I haven’t heard the law, then my heart will be right: and so I will not commit adultery, I will not murder, steal, bear false witness, dishonor my parents, covet my neighbor’s wife or goods. I will honor and worship God, putting Him first above all else, and will set aside time to specifically do so. That's the meaning of Rom 13:8-10.
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,228
2,753
MI
✟416,076.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Ok, than answer me this, if we have laid aside the commandment of God as Jesus quoted from the Ten Commandments Mark 7:7-13 how can one be keeping them in James 2:11-12
LOL. You can't even acknowledge that you are trying to talk about something besides what I was talking about, which had nothing to do with laying aside any commandments. If you think James 2:10 has anything to do with that, then you are reading things into the verse that aren't there.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
12,998
5,456
USA
✟682,542.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Whether Paul was speaking of the ceremonial law or the moral law (and he was referring to both in Phil 3) or any other law, his assertion throughout is that the law, good and right as it is, cannot justify us, including, as you know, the moral law as per Rom 7. This should be especially obvious when considering circumcision, thinking that the removal of a little piece of flesh can actually make one holy, but it’s equally true of the commandments; the mere external observance of the law does not make one holy either. And that was the problem with the Pharisees: they may’ve been clean on the outside but were still filthy on the inside-regardless of outside behavior, IOW. I can refrain from adultery or murder and still have lust and anger in my heart.

But if I love, even if I haven’t heard the law, then my heart will be right: and so I will not commit adultery, I will not murder, steal, bear false witness, dishonor my parents, covet my neighbor’s wife or goods. I will honor and worship God, putting Him first above all else, and will set aside time to specifically do so. That's the meaning of Rom 13:8-10.
I will have to agree to disagree, we can go by what's in our heart on what we feel is right, but why would we, when we know our heart can deceive us Jer 17:9. It too easy to cover our sins which one will not prosper Pro 28:13 Why even Rom 13 quotes directly from the Ten Commandments to tells us what sums up love to our neighbor quoting from the commandments that deal with our neighbor. So its not some arbitrary love it is keeping God's commandments the way God gave them 1 John 5:2-3. The problem with the Pharisees as Jesus taught is they replaced God's commandments, again quoting from the Ten Commandment, condemning them for replacing God's law with their own man-made laws and traditions (what felt right) and in doing so said their heart is far from Him, worshipping Him in vain Mat 15:3-14 Mark 7:7-13 why Jesus taught not to break or teach others to break the least of these commandments again quoting from the Ten Commandments and showing the intent behind the commandments, not to even have thoughts that lead to breaking them because that's where sin starts in the heart. Mat 5:19-30
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
12,998
5,456
USA
✟682,542.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
LOL. You can't even acknowledge that you are trying to talk about something besides what I was talking about, which had nothing to do with laying aside any commandments. If you think James 2:10 has anything to do with that, then you are reading things into the verse that aren't there.
James 2:11-12 is quoting and contrasting the Ten Commandments, breaking one we break them all- so if we lay aside one of these commandments , as it say this commandment is not for me, how is one keeping James 2:11-12 its the same result. Breaking one of the commandments. The Ten Commandments were never the 9 commandments. God numbered them by design its the only biblical number in Scripture numbered Deut 4:13 Exo 34:18 and written by God because God would know what man would try to do with His holy and eternal law. He said He would not alter His Words Psa 89:34 not a jot or tittle Mat 5:18-19 because man is not greater than our Maker or His own Testimony Exo 31:18
 
Upvote 0

RandyPNW

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2021
3,360
774
Pacific NW, USA
✟157,759.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
To the One Who Twists the Covenant and Rejects the Commandments of God
I like the irenicism of previous eras when Christians could temper their comments and speak graciously with fellow Christians. Differences of opinion could be offered with respect, assuming that important creedal beliefs were not being viciously challenged in a sectarian spirit. There is no threat to a society if Christians maintain good relations with one another.
You speak boldly, but not with understanding. You say the Ten Commandments are not part of the New Covenant, but you show that you neither know the Scriptures nor the power of God. You confuse the Word and lead others into error, showing a heart that is not humble, but hardened against the truth that Jesus plainly taught.
As I've said a couple of times. the *moral principles* of the 10 Commandments are retained in the New Covenant. But no, the 10 Commandments is not, by definition, part of the New Covenant. The 10 Commandments went with the other regulations and laws to convict Israel that they were imperfect in their walk with God, and therefore needed sacrifices, which was the other part of the Old Covenant.

The Sabbath Law, contained in the 10 Commandments, is not part of the New Covenant. But we follow the Moral spirit contained in that law, which involves the need to obey God's word, in whatever form it takes. And we are reminded in the principle of "Rest" that we could not do the work of Redemption--only Christ could do that. What we do today, under the New Covenant, is impose "rest" upon our flesh, and agree to cooperate with Christ in his work of testifying to the Gospel.
You dishonor the words of Jesus—the very One you claim to follow.

When He was asked, “What must I do to inherit eternal life?”—Jesus did not speak in riddles or vague ideas about moral likeness or abstract faith. He said clearly:


Not just any commandments. He named them—from the Ten Commandments: “You shall not murder, you shall not commit adultery, you shall not steal…” and so on. These are not vague spiritual impressions—they are clear, written laws, etched in stone by the very finger of God (Exodus 31:18).
I explained this. The man was *still under the Law of Moses,* which in my book includes the 10 Commandments. It was promised Israel that upon obedience to the whole Law the nation would obtain life, prosperity, and political deliverance from their enemies.

In the same mode, Jesus told the man that if he followed the Law faithfully he also would be blessed with the Messianic hope of Eternal Life. He would not be earning Eternal Life. But he would be remaining in a position with God in order to receive it after it happened.
Jesus Himself said:
Have heaven and earth passed away? No? Then neither have God’s commandments.
The commandments were designed not to keep Israel in a legacy of sin and failure forever. Rather, the Law pointed to Christ their Redeemer from sin. So at the time Israel had to continue in obedience under the Law, up until Christ provided his work of redemption. All of that was necessary to be "fulfilled" before the universe can be "remodeled." People have to be made perfect, which was not possible under the jurisdiction of the Law. But I've told you all this already.
You talk of “a new system” as if God changes like shifting shadows. But the LORD said:

The New Covenant was not made to abolish the Ten Commandments, but to write them on the heart.
You just mentioned the "New Covenant," which implied a "new system." Are you a "shifting shadow?"

No, the book of Hebrews clearly outlines the difference between the Old Covenant and the New Covenant, and uses those words without "shifting shadows."
Which law? Not the laws of the Levites, not the temple rituals, but the very law that God gave His people from Sinai—the Ten Commandments, which He called “My covenant” (Exodus 34:28).

You talk of faith, but what is faith if it leads to lawlessness?
Was God "lawless" when He made Man in his image and likeness without spelling out all of the laws you apparently want listed?

Listing the laws become necessary when people want to deface God and make Him appear to be lawless. So, we point people to the example Christ set in the Gospels. And we point out that he "fulfilled the Law," indicating that many of the principles in the Law, or eternal moral laws, continue to be in effect under the jurisdiction of a New Covenant.
You say Jesus lived “separate from the law,” but this is a lie. He lived in full obedience to His Father’s law, and He said:
I said that Jesus lived under the *era of the Law," but not under its mandates which involve redemption from sin. The Law showed Israel it was flawed and need to remedy that problem in their lives. Jesus had no such need for remediation. The Law was designed not for him, but as a pattern of legal work that he would fulfill.
You dishonor that love when you separate it from obedience.
I never said any such thing! You are full of hostility, and in that environment it's difficult to believe I can make a point with you? Hopefully something I say will help others who are more open and have a congenial spirit?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,228
2,753
MI
✟416,076.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
James 2:11-12 is quoting and contrasting the Ten Commandments, breaking one we break them all- so if we lay aside one of these commandments , as it say this commandment is not for me, how is one keeping James 2:11-12 its the same result. Breaking one of the commandments. The Ten Commandments were never the 9 commandments. God numbered them by design its the only biblical number in Scripture numbered Deut 4:13 Exo 34:18 and written by God because God would know what man would try to do with His holy and eternal law. He said He would not alter His Words Psa 89:34 not a jot or tittle Mat 5:18-19 because man is not greater than our Maker or His own Testimony Exo 31:18
LOL. I was not talking about James 2:11-12, I was talking about something that someone said about James 2:10. You refuse to acknowledge that you are talking about something different than what I was talking about. Why?

Do you or do you not agree that James 2:10 says that if we break even one commandment in the law, regardless of which commandments and which law you think he was talking about, we are then guilty of breaking them all? Yes or no?

Do you or do you not agree that the only point being made in James 2:10 relates to him saying that breaking one commandment in the law makes you guilty of breaking all of the commandments of the law?

Do you or do you not agree that James 2:10 says nothing about deleting any commandment from the law?
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
12,998
5,456
USA
✟682,542.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
LOL. I was not talking about James 2:11-12, I was talking about something that someone said about James 2:10. You refuse to acknowledge that you are talking about something different than what I was talking about. Why?

Do you or do you not agree that James 2:10 says that if we break even one commandment in the law, regardless of which commandments and which law you think he was talking about, we are then guilty of breaking them all? Yes or no?

Do you or do you not agree that the only point being made in James 2:10 relates to him saying that breaking one commandment in the law makes you guilty of breaking all of the commandments of the law?

Do you or do you not agree that James 2:10 says nothing about deleting any commandment from the law?
James 2:10 regarding the whole law is what James 2:11-12 is referring to i.e. the Ten Commandments. Why would you think it wouldn't be explained by the Scripture what it meant?
 
Upvote 0

JesusFollowerForever

Disciple of Jesus
Jan 19, 2024
1,249
835
quebec
✟72,205.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
LOL. I was not talking about James 2:11-12, I was talking about something that someone said about James 2:10. You refuse to acknowledge that you are talking about something different than what I was talking about. Why?

Do you or do you not agree that James 2:10 says that if we break even one commandment in the law, regardless of which commandments and which law you think he was talking about, we are then guilty of breaking them all? Yes or no?

Do you or do you not agree that the only point being made in James 2:10 relates to him saying that breaking one commandment in the law makes you guilty of breaking all of the commandments of the law?

Do you or do you not agree that James 2:10 says nothing about deleting any commandment from the law?
James 2:10 highlights the unity of God's law: "For whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all." This means that the law is not a set of independent rules, but a unified standard. Breaking even one commandment disrupts the entire system of holiness and righteousness God has established. The Ten Commandments, as given on the tablets of stone, represent this cohesive law. Though they address different aspects of life—our relationship with God and others—they are all interconnected. To violate one commandment is to dishonor the entire moral framework.

This concept extends to the Covenant. In the Old Testament, the law was the foundation of God's agreement with Israel. Obeying the law was a sign of faithfulness to the covenant relationship. Even though the law was broken by Israel repeatedly, the unity of the law remains a constant reminder that holiness cannot be compromised.

In the New Covenant, Jesus fulfills the law perfectly, yet the moral law remains binding. He didn't abolish the law but brought it to its fullest expression. Therefore, breaking one commandment in the New Covenant still implies breaking the whole law, emphasizing its unbreakable unity. Through Christ, we are called to uphold the law’s moral standards, not by our strength but through grace and the empowerment of the Holy Spirit.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,228
2,753
MI
✟416,076.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
James 2:10 regarding the whole law is what James 2:11-12 is referring to i.e. the Ten Commandments. Why would you think it wouldn't be explained by the Scripture what it meant?
Why are you not addressing my questions? Can you please just answer my questions instead of trying to change the topic?
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
12,998
5,456
USA
✟682,542.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Why are you not addressing my questions? Can you please just answer my questions instead of trying to change the topic?
Its been answered more than once. Not much more I can add, so I guess I will just agree to disagree.
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,228
2,753
MI
✟416,076.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
James 2:10 highlights the unity of God's law: "For whoever shall keep the whole law, and yet stumble in one point, he is guilty of all." This means that the law is not a set of independent rules, but a unified standard. Breaking even one commandment disrupts the entire system of holiness and righteousness God has established. The Ten Commandments, as given on the tablets of stone, represent this cohesive law. Though they address different aspects of life—our relationship with God and others—they are all interconnected. To violate one commandment is to dishonor the entire moral framework.

This concept extends to the Covenant. In the Old Testament, the law was the foundation of God's agreement with Israel. Obeying the law was a sign of faithfulness to the covenant relationship. Even though the law was broken by Israel repeatedly, the unity of the law remains a constant reminder that holiness cannot be compromised.

In the New Covenant, Jesus fulfills the law perfectly, yet the moral law remains binding. He didn't abolish the law but brought it to its fullest expression. Therefore, breaking one commandment in the New Covenant still implies breaking the whole law, emphasizing its unbreakable unity. Through Christ, we are called to uphold the law’s moral standards, not by our strength but through grace and the empowerment of the Holy Spirit.
What I was addressing in relation to James 2:10 was the claim that it has something to do with deleting a commandment. No, it does not have anything to do with that. Do you agree? Why do you guys not want to just address what was actually being discussed?
 
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,228
2,753
MI
✟416,076.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Its been answered more than once. Not much more I can add, so I guess I will just agree to disagree.
You did not answer my questions even once, let alone more than once. You instead tried to talk about something different than what I was talking about.
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
12,998
5,456
USA
✟682,542.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You did not answer my questions even once, let alone more than once. You instead tried to talk about something different than what I was talking about.
Its talking about the Ten Commandments- the whole law James 2:10 is referring to is explained in James 2:11-12. I was referring to exactly to what its talking about.

Breaking one of the Ten Commandments is like breaking them all what James only quoted and contrasted. James 2:11-12 If we lay aside (delete) one of the commandments as to say its not for me, than one wouldn't be keeping it so it would still be considered breaking one we break them all and being a transgressor of the law. I'm not sure why you are not understanding this. I don;t think
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Spiritual Jew

Amillennialist
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2020
8,228
2,753
MI
✟416,076.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Its talking about the Ten Commandments- the whole law James 2:10 is referring to is explained in James 2:11-12. I was referring to exactly to what its talking about.
You didn't address what I was talking about in relation to that verse. I was refuting someone saying that it has something to do with deleting a commandment. I'm saying it doesn't. Do you agree with me on that or not?
 
Upvote 0

SabbathBlessings

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2020
12,998
5,456
USA
✟682,542.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
You didn't address what I was talking about in relation to that verse. I was refuting someone saying that it has something to do with deleting a commandment. I'm saying it doesn't. Do you agree with me on that or not?
It says breaking one, we break them all, but if one chooses to "delete" laying it aside how is that any different? Both results into being a transgressor of the law.
 
Upvote 0