- Sep 3, 2011
- 16,196
- 4,044
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
No, you got Jesus wrong in Matt 7:22-23. You made it fit your theology, not His.Jesus got it wrong in Mt 7:22-23.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No, you got Jesus wrong in Matt 7:22-23. You made it fit your theology, not His.Jesus got it wrong in Mt 7:22-23.
And that is the problem. . .As I said, it means more than that, not less than that as if forgiveness is excluded. When a person is justified, they are forgiven,, washed, cleansed, made new creations with new hearts and spirits, now children of God enabled by His grace to live as children of God should.
And justice is an appropriate translation there. Either way its all translation and interpretation unless we have the original manuscript and can speak the original language and can know the original author's intention.
The terms are just part of classical western scholarship where the Latin language and usage prevailed.
Yes, the text is in Greek. The word "righteousness" is not in the text either!!! It's an English word. And why do you use the term "justification"? It means to be made just, translating the Greek, based on the same Latin word justificare. It's a matter of usage and "justice" is a valid translation. But why waste time on such a non-issue anyway?And that is the problem. . .
The text is in Greek. . .and that is not its meaning in the Greek.
Seems "something was last in the translation."
That's how it's used in the example given. What does God clothe us with? What do you say He imputes to us?Example of the Reformation use of "justice" to mean righteousness.
The Greek dikaiosis (justification) is a declaration, a sentence, a pronouncement of "not guilty," a right standing with God, as the result of that same faith (Ro 3:28) which saved them (Eph 2:8-9).
It is a forensic righteousness only, not an actual righteousness of character, which actual righteousness is sanctification/holiness (hagiasmos).
Words have definitions.Yes, the text is in Greek. The word "righteousness" is not in the text either!!!
Please present the text and show my error (that miracle-working faith is not saving faith).No, you got Jesus wrong in Matt 7:22-23. You made it fit your theology, not His.
I don't have to. God is the author of true faith. If a person works a miracle by that faith, then He certainly knows them. If He doesn't know them than it can't be true faith or any kind of faith that came from Him in other words. You related those miracles to true faith, not me.Please present the text and show my error (that miracle-working faith is not saving faith).
Yes, and the word justice also fits the definition, as the Reformer Luther understood.Words have definitions.
See dikaiosune (righteousness), Ro 3:5, 25, 26, Mt 5:6, 1 20, Jn 16:8, 10, etc. . .
Faith is belief and trust in the person and atoning work of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of one's sin and right standing with God's justice (sinless = justified, a forensic righteousness).
The OT sacrifices give us the meaning of Jesus's sacrifice; i.e. they covered the sin of God's people (Ro 4:7).
Our NT sacrifice forgives the sin of God's people (those who believe in Jesus Christ), saving them from God's wrath (Ro 5:9) on their sin at the Judgment.
And I denied the faith of those miraculous works was true faith, asserting the faith of those miracles was counterfeit.I don't have to. God is the author of true faith. If a person works a miracle by that faith, then He certainly knows them. If He doesn't know them than it can't be true faith or any kind of faith that came from Him in other words. You related those miracles to true faith, not me.
Right..."Miracle-working faith"-haven't seen that one in the bible for some reason. In truth, Matt 7:22-23 shouldn't even be on the table! It has nothing to do with faith, a gift of God that can work miracles.MIracle-working faith is not necessarily true faith.
Contraire. . ."Lord, Lord" (Mt 7:22) has everything to do with faith.Right..."Miracle-working faith"-haven't seen that one in the bible for some reason. In truth, Matt 7:22-23 shouldn't even be on the table!
It has nothing to do with faith, a gift of God that can work miracles.
Actually, Luther got that from Augustine, neither of whom got it out from the Greek, because it is not there.Yes, and the word justice also fits the definition, as the Reformer Luther understood.
Faith in who, what? Anyone can say. "Lord, Lord". Are you now saying that their faith was true after all? Miracles are supernatural by definition, Clare. So if God responds to their faith by working a miracle, then they're certainly one of His-He's not some kind of robot who has to respond to everyone's desires, just as He wouldn't grant Simon the Sorcerer's request for power. "Lord, Lord" means nothing in itself, certainly not faith in Him. So give it up; Paul's treatment of faith is obviously referencing Matt 17:20-21 and has exactly nothing to do with Matt 7:22-23.Contraire. . ."Lord, Lord" (Mt 7:22) has everything to do with faith.
Agreed. . .because if his faith does not lead to repentance, it is not saving faith.What you described is the Gospel that a sinner may choose to believe in or refuse when he hears the Gospel (Romans 10:17-18) and is convicted by the Spirit (Acts 7:51-54); however, if believing in the Gospel does not lead to repentance toward God (2 Corinthians 7:10) and faith in Lord Jesus manifested by following him, his faith in the Gospel will not save him.
This is another nonsensical unprofitable rabbit trail, as the question on faith is as well. Anyway, they all got from historical usage. So for your edification, Rom 3 of the bible, the Douay Rheims, based on the Vulgate:Actually, Luther got that from Augustine, neither of whom got it out from the Greek, because it is not there.
Please present the NT Scripture where justice (dike) is used of righteousness in the believer.
Have you read Mt 7:22-23?Faith in who, what? Anyone can say. "Lord, Lord".
Contraire. . .Are you now saying that their faith was true after all? Miracles are supernatural by definition, Clare. So
if God responds to their faith by working a miracle, then they're certainly one of His
And yet you maintain that Lord, Lord means faith in Jesus.4) counterfeit faith works miracles (Mt 7:22-23).
If yer truly interested in learning something about the faith instead of remaining stuck on partial and parochial understanding, then the following should be enlightening:Actually, Luther got that from Augustine, neither of whom got it out from the Greek, because it is not there.
Please present the NT Scripture where justice (dike) is used of righteousness in the believer.