- Nov 20, 2022
- 482
- 64
- Country
- Canada
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- CA-Conservatives
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Yes I read it I quoted from it. How would I quote from it without reading it? If it contains any information that refutes what I said then why wouldn’t you highlight it? You mention Westminster as if they’re an authority on biblical interpretation. I just pointed out an error that should be obvious to anyone who can read and comprehend English. Their explanation is exactly the same as your explanation so when I pointed out the error in your interpretation you quoted Westminster saying the same exact thing. That’s not an explanation of why or how your interpretation correct, it’s merely quoting someone else who says the same thing. If God ordains sin then He is the source of sin because the word ordain means to order or decree which means He is the very origin of the sin. The sin did not originate from a different source. This is why your interpretation of foreknowledge doesn’t work. When you understand that God foreknew what would take place and caused everything to work together for the good to those who love Him then He is not the author of sin because the sin did not originate from Him.Well it states it right in the Westminster and Baptist Confession that I posted. Did you even read it and sought to understand what is was saying?
Can you explain these passages then?No peace is ever found in choosing.
The Prince of Peace, thereby, has already decided.
There is no Free Will, PERIOD!
And Isaiah 55:11 >Job 42:2
I think that people get wrapped around the axle on "free will".
God's Will - There is God's will which is perfect and unstained. Every decision God makes, He makes perfectly. So Christ, being tempted in the wilderness, had legitimate choices. He looked at those choices and, being led by God's Holy Spirit, always choose to do the right thing, every single time.
Free Will - Free will implies that, in ourselves and apart from any outside influences, we can make the right decision for God. Thus, technically, one could live a unstained life and live according to the law of God. We know this is impossible because no one does what is right. And nowhere in Scripture is free will ever mentioned.
Too funny!Human Will - We, on the other hand, have what I call a human (not free) will to distinguish it from "free". This human will is rebellious towards the things of God because, like Adam, we just want to take that bite of the fruit. If God tells us not to put peas up our nose,
In some translations that are as good as the others, it seems,So, humans can not choose to cancel any of whatever God's word is sure to do.
In order to formulate a doctrine based on Job 42:2 you have to first determine what is meant by God’s purpose. We both agree that He will accomplish His purpose or plan, where we disagree is in what His plan is and how He chose to execute it.Job 42:2
If this meant what you think it does no one would sin. One thing that has been constant throughout the scriptures from the very first man to the very last is that man has repeatedly disobeyed God.So shall My word be that goes forth from My mouth;
It shall not return to Me void,
But it shall accomplish what I please,
And it shall prosper in the thing for which I sent it.'"
(Isaiah 55:11)
fwiw , many many many doctrines are "based on Scripture" (they(false ministers or priests of God) say), with no knowledge of God's Purpose nor God's Will, "not knowing the Power of God nor Scripture".In order to formulate a doctrine based on Job 42:2 you have to first determine what is meant by God’s purpose. We both agree that He will accomplish His purpose or plan, where we disagree is in what His plan is and how He chose to execute it.
Both the Westminster Confession of Faith and the London Baptist Confession of Faith were created by a body of godly men working independently and arriving at the same conclusion. So I would suggest that what you think might be errors in their logic is simply your missing the point of what they were expressing in the confessions. From the Westminster Confession Chapter 3Yes I read it I quoted from it. How would I quote from it without reading it? If it contains any information that refutes what I said then why wouldn’t you highlight it? You mention Westminster as if they’re an authority on biblical interpretation. I just pointed out an error that should be obvious to anyone who can read and comprehend English. Their explanation is exactly the same as your explanation so when I pointed out the error in your interpretation you quoted Westminster saying the same exact thing. That’s not an explanation of why or how your interpretation correct, it’s merely quoting someone else who says the same thing. If God ordains sin then He is the source of sin because the word ordain means to order or decree which means He is the very origin of the sin. The sin did not originate from a different source. This is why your interpretation of foreknowledge doesn’t work. When you understand that God foreknew what would take place and caused everything to work together for the good to those who love Him then He is not the author of sin because the sin did not originate from Him.
I agree that God's word says there are ones who resist and interfere with God's word.In some translations that are as good as the others, it seems,
it is written that there are religious leaders , people ,
who "THWART" God's purpose for their lives
by rejecting Jesus or rejecting Jesus Instructions.
The results being they are not saved.
Yes, people sin.If this meant what you think it does no one would sin. One thing that has been constant throughout the scriptures from the very first man to the very last is that man has repeatedly disobeyed God.
He needs no help to bring about His Purpose."God resists the proud" (in 1 Peter 5:5 and in James 4:6).
His resistance is very effective, and He turns the thwarting to even help bring about His purpose.
Do you not understand that the Book cannot be changed, therefore all those in the book had no choice?Can you explain these passages then?
Here God is making it absolutely clear that He has given the choice to us.
““See, I have set before you today life and prosperity, and death and adversity; in that I command you today to love the Lord your God, to walk in His ways and to keep His commandments and His statutes and His judgments, that you may live and multiply, and that the Lord your God may bless you in the land where you are entering to possess it. But if your heart turns away and you will not obey, but are drawn away and worship other gods and serve them, I declare to you today that you shall surely perish. You will not prolong your days in the land where you are crossing the Jordan to enter and possess it. I call heaven and earth to witness against you today, that I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. So choose life in order that you may live, you and your descendants,”
Deuteronomy 30:15-19 NASB1995
Here David had a choice.
““Go and speak to David, ‘Thus the Lord says, “I am offering you three things; choose for yourself one of them, which I will do to you.” ’ ””
2 Samuel 24:12 NASB1995
“I will destine you for the sword, And all of you will bow down to the slaughter. Because I called, but you did not answer; I spoke, but you did not hear. And you did evil in My sight And chose that in which I did not delight.””
Isaiah 65:12 NASB1995
Here God specifically says “I CALLED YOU BUT YOU DID NOT ANSWER”. I SPOKE BUT YOU DID NOT ANSWER, AND YOU DID EVIL IN MY SIGHT THAT IN WHICH I DID NOT DELIGHT”. How do explain this? God called them but didn’t allow them to answer? He spoke to them but didn’t let them hear? He ordained them to do evil that He did not want them to do? None of that would make any sense at all.
“They have built the high places of Topheth, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire, which I did not command, and it did not come into My mind.”
Jeremiah 7:31 NASB1995
According to God these people were committing human sacrifices that God absolutely DID NOT ORDAIN.
In "the Book" is often stated and made clear that they choose/chose to do evil, or they choose/chose to live righteously.Do you not understand that the Book cannot be changed, therefore all those in the book had no choice?
There has been so much discussion and comparison of doctrine. But how much is our attention dealing with how we compare with Jesus?Both the Westminster Confession of Faith and the London Baptist Confession of Faith were created by a body of godly men working independently and arriving at the same conclusion.
It is good to understand what someone means, so we can accurately represent what we are agreeing or disagreeing with. When our Apostle Paul disagreed with something, he would correctly represent what someone was saying, but then disagree > 1 Corinthians 15:13-19.So I would suggest that what you think might be errors in their logic is simply your missing the point of what they were expressing in the confessions.
My personal take is God has the spirit of evil to deal with >From the Westminster Confession Chapter 3
1. From all eternity and by the completely wise and holy purpose of his own will, God has freely and unchangeably ordained whatever happens.1
There is timing.God has (ordained) set into motion every event that was to take place. (Christ came in the fullness of time Gal 4:4)
I do not believe that God created the spirit of evil. The character of evil"s spirit is the author.This ordainment does not mean, however, that God is the author of sin (he is not),
God is the All-Worker > Ephesians 1:11, Romans 9:21 > managing the evil, including howthat he represses the will of his created beings,
"God works in you both to will and to do" (in Philippians 2:14)or that he takes away the freedom or contingency of secondary causes. 2
Since God laid everything out as how events would transpirer, this does not mean that God is the cause of bad things happening to people. Nor does it mean that He represses our will or somehow interfer with our lives to force us to do something we don't want to do.
He can manage how much things and people appear to control things, and how we perceive who and what is really in control.Rather, the will of created beings and the freedom and contingency of secondary causes are established by him.3
For children of God >Instead by nature we do thing freely that results in what God has ordained, either through our own efforts or as the result of responding to circumstances around us.
Managing. . . timing . . .No where did people ever think God was the origin of sin. It specifically says that He wasn't. God just set into motion all the events that would happen.
This earth is now God's prisoner-of-war camp for Satan and his. Ones need to obey God in His grace so we are ready always to make His good use of whatever happens, even like how Jesus on the cross used that to do so much good.So if you come down with cancer, or someone close to you dies in a car crash, or the tower of Salome falls on top of you, it was part of God's plan for which we cannot even begin to understand or see the final outcome.
Yes, God needs no help, but He does include us in accomplishing His purpose which includes us being conformed to the image of Jesus.He needs no help to bring about His Purpose.
The wicked perish.
The ones who seek Jesus find Jesus.
How do you get from what I say any idea about "no power to choose"? I'm insisting that we DO choose, but always according to our inclinations.Ok, but none of what you descibe makes me by certainty choose coffee. You can have all you describe and still choose tea. Your job is to prove that you have no power to choose what your inclination will be.
There is way too much data to draw a complete picture. Why you choose coffee is a complex answer. I'd have to know all history (all chains of cause-and-effect as they relate to that choice at any one time) to come up with that. But that you always choose according to your inclinations is (to me) obvious.I won't argue about that, though I think it's an oversimplified or an incomplete picture.
Are you using the Bible to disprove the Bible? You know that it directly says God regretted or repented that He made man. In fact, there are other places in the ot that say God repented.I'm not the one who is saying God "regretted" or repented of His actions. You may want to look at the following verse:
Numbers 23:19 “God is not a man, that He should lie, Nor a son of man, that He should repent; Has He said, and will He not do it? Or has He spoken, and will He not make it good?
So now you go with commentators who are applying the same principles to the interpretation of the OT that you just got done judging me for.What you are abscribing to God is simply a projection of our humanist. God is not like us. I'll stand by with the nunerous commentators on what I stated.
God doesn't get "mad". God "ordains" simply means that God has set in a particular order all things. Thus, Christ came at exactly the right time (in the fullness of time).