Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You can do the search and then show me why and how I am wrong.
Thank you for sharing your opinion on what you think I should do.If you claim that was what the Romans thought when they destroyed the temple in AD 70, it is your job to back that claim.
It is not the job of your readers to prove otherwise.
Do you have another theory of who the two witnesses are in Rev 11?As in they were seen on Earth during AD 70?
All I have to show you is the arch of Titus.Show me any Roman history page
All I have to show you is the arch of Titus.
- Victory Triumph Procession: One panel shows the start of Titus’ 71 CE victory triumph procession as it passes through the Porta Triumphalis to the Forum Boarium. Participants carry booty from the Temple of Jerusalem after the sacking of the city. The booty includes a seven-branched candelabra (menorah), silver trumpets, and perhaps even the Ark of the Covenant. Some figures carry placards indicating the names of conquered cities and peoples.
View attachment 346084
Do you have another theory of who the two witnesses are in Rev 11?
In Revelation 11:3-6, we encounter a description of two powerful witnesses who play a significant role during the end times. Although their names are not explicitly given, several theories exist regarding their identity:
Moses and Elijah:
- Some scholars believe the two witnesses could be Moses and Elijah.
- These two figures are significant in biblical history:
- Moses: The great lawgiver who led the Israelites out of Egypt and performed miracles.
- Elijah: The prophet who confronted idolatry, called down fire from heaven, and was taken directly to heaven without experiencing death (2 Kings 2:11).
- Their appearance at the transfiguration alongside Jesus (Matthew 17:3–4) adds to this theory.
Enoch and Elijah:
- Another theory suggests that the two witnesses could be Enoch and Elijah:
- Enoch: The man who walked with God and was taken directly to heaven without experiencing death (Genesis 5:23; Hebrews 11:5).
- Elijah: As mentioned earlier, he was also taken directly to heaven (2 Kings 2:11).
- Both Enoch and Elijah were prophets who pronounced God’s judgment.
No, it does not. Many people believe the way I do about this subject. You are not one of them.That means you made that up![]()
I think it is a future event and I think the two witness are the Church and the Hebrews.
Why re-use OT people? The 2 Witnesses are not said to be anyone special, just 2 godly people, preaching the coming Kingdom, like the other 143,998 Witnesses will do.I believe it will be Moses and Elijah.
Israel will be God's favored nation once again during the Tribulation, Enoch is just too far removed from them.
Moses was there at the transfiguration with Elijah, but he was not raptured like Enoch was.
Why re-use OT people? The 2 Witnesses are not said to be anyone special, just 2 godly people, preaching the coming Kingdom, like the other 143,998 Witnesses will do.
The Jewish State of Israel will be no more after the Lords Day of vengeance and wrath. Many Prophesies tell us of the virtual demise of those apostate people. Only a remnant will survive.
Gods favoured peoples are the faithful Christians and any belief of a Jewish redemption, is wrong and made just to support the false 'rapture to heaven' theory.
Yes, but for a task much different than the 2W's. Revelation 11:4-7Elijah is prophesied in Malachi to come before Christ.
Yes Moses is a far better witness second only to Christ Himself. But he is not a type of the rapture.Well, who is better to convince Israel to believe Christ is their Messiah, and to turn water into blood, like Moses?
Matthew 11:14, Jesus says, “And if you are willing to accept it, John himself is Elijah who was to come.”John the Baptist would have been him, had Israel accepted Christ as their Messiah at his first coming.
Matthew 11:14, Jesus says, “And if you are willing to accept it, John himself is Elijah who was to come.”
John did not make that claim.
John 1:21 "They asked him, “Then who are you? Are you Elijah?” He said, “I am not.” “Are you the Prophet?” He answered, “No.”