Israel-Hamas Thread II

[Bradskii]

The blood beginning to come out of the stone.

Can I take it that your meaning is that the Hamas leaders are responsible for the civilians in the West Bank being in a "war zone". You may have missed it but the Oct 7 attack was launched from Gaza not the West Bank.

This is what you have said:

'Israel is not responsible for "civilians Christians. NON MILITARY" being in a war zone.'

The discussion is about The West Bank. Which is an (illegal) Israeli occupied territory. And then:

'I am telling you either they are there voluntarily, therefore military, or they are there involuntarily.'

So all the Israeli settlers in the West Bank are military or are being held there against their will? None of your posts are making any sense whatsoever.

 

[Bradskii]

That disagreement has nothing to do with it. War does. And to put people in harms way in warefare is their fault no on else.

It's Israel who have been putting people there.

 

[ralliann]

This is what you have said:

'Israel is not responsible for "civilians Christians. NON MILITARY" being in a war zone.'

The discussion is about The West Bank. Which is an (illegal) Israeli occupied territory. And then:

'I am telling you either they are there voluntarily, therefore military, or they are there involuntarily.'

So all the Israeli settlers in the West Bank are military or are being held there against their will? None of your posts are making any sense whatsoever.

Sorry you can't read them. just ignore them.

 

[ralliann]

It's Israel who have been putting people there.

It is war. Sorry you don't like that. It can happen in disputes. Usually governments protect civilians sorry for those who do not have that.

 

[essentialsaltes]

That disagreement has nothing to do with it.

The 'disagreement' about the West Bank? Well, that's where these particular children are being killed, so I think it does have something to do with it.

And to put people in harms way in warefare is their fault no on else.

Who is they? In the West Bank it's not really Hamas.

 

[ralliann]

The 'disagreement' about the West Bank? Well, that's where these particular children are being killed, so I think it does have something to do with it

Who is they? In the West Bank it's not really Hamas.

The 'disagreement' about the West Bank? Well, that's where these particular children are being killed, so I think it does have something to do with it.


Who is they? In the West Bank it's not really Hamas.

When you are attacked you attack back.

 

[Bradskii]

When you are attacked you attack back.

The West Bank has nothing to do with Israel's attack on Gaza. You do know it's a separate place? You do know it's full of Israeli settlers as well as Palestinians? Again, your posts make no sense. It sounds like you know nothing about the area.

What on earth does this even mean? ''I am telling you either they are there voluntarily, therefore military, or they are there involuntarily.'

 

[ralliann]

The West Bank has nothing to do with Israel's attack on Gaza. You do know it's a separate place? You do know it's full of Israeli settlers as well as Palestinians? Again, your posts make no sense. It sounds like you know nothing about the area.

What on earth does this even mean? ''I am telling you either they are there voluntarily, therefore military, or they are there involuntarily.'

Give ma break. the minutia matters not. Iran has been shooying and gettinginvolved, so have people in the west bank. So Israel has fought back. The provocation to a wider war by others than the geographic area of Gaza, is not the only people or areas involving themselves. It's war and others are attempting to widen it.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Give ma break. the minutia matters not. Iran has been shooying and gettinginvolved, so have people in the west bank. So Israel has fought back. The provocation to a wider war by others than the geographic area of Gaza, is not the only people or areas involving themselves. It's war and others are attempting to widen it.

Why should we give you a break? You have an a bad habit of ignoring and resisting basic facts when they are presented to you. West Bank rather than Gaza is *NOT* minutia.

Hamas ruled Gaza, they have no power in the West Bank.
Israeli settlers in the West Bank attacking local Palestinians is not Israel "fighting back". Its just misdirected "revenge" at people who didn't perpetrate the Oct 7 attack from Gaza.

 

[ralliann]

Why should we give you a break?

Well then I will. Later.

 

[Bradskii]

Give ma break.

So we have to stop pointing out that you are making no sense? You have yet to explain this: 'I am telling you either they are there (in the West Bank) voluntarily, therefore military, or they are there involuntarily.' I guess you can respond when you get back.

If you want your opinions to be taken credibly then you have to post something that actually is credible.

 

[ralliann]

So we have to stop pointing out that you are making no sense? You have yet to explain this: 'I am telling you either they are there (in the West Bank) voluntarily, therefore military, or they are there involuntarily.'

If you want your opinions to be taken credibly then you have to post something that actually is credible.

Ignore me please. Carry on! I am not gonna beat my head againsrt a wall if you are convinced Israsel is just shooting for nothing. what's left to talk about?

 

[Bradskii]

Ignore me please. Carry on! I am not gonna beat my head againsrt a wall if you are convinced Israsel is just shooting for nothing. what's left to talk about?

This:

'I am telling you either they are there (in the West Bank) voluntarily, therefore military, or they are there involuntarily.'

 

[ralliann]

This:

'I am telling you either they are there (in the West Bank) voluntarily, therefore military, or they are there involuntarily.'

Yeah, they are attacking isrealis, therefore are to be considered military (or combatants).
Or are not combatants and are not able to avoid being in the cross fire (involuntary).

 

[ralliann]

This is what you have said:

'Israel is not responsible for "civilians Christians. NON MILITARY" being in a war zone.'

The discussion is about The West Bank. Which is an (illegal) Israeli occupied territory. And then:

Not to Israel it is not.

 

[Bradskii]

Yeah, they are attacking isrealis, therefore are to be considered military (or combatants).
Or are not combatants and are not able to avoid being in the cross fire (involuntary).

'They are there involuntarily' means they are involuntarily being shot? And so are not military. And those not being shot (involuntarily) are military? So the 63 Palestinian children killed by Israeli forces since this bloodbath began I guess were military, right up to the point where they were killed. Then they become innocent children.

At least 101 children killed in the West Bank this year

An eight-year-old boy shot dead in the street is one of the most recent casualties of violence in the occupied West Bank.

www.savethechildren.net

Ye gods, what a shambles. You know nothing about this, do you. If it wasn't so serious I'd call it Pythonesque.

 

[Bradskii]

Not to Israel it is not.

Israeli occupation of the West Bank - Wikipedia

en.m.wikipedia.org

'Before proceeding with settlement, the government sought legal advice from their resident expert on international law, Theodor Meron.[al] His top secret memorandum stated unequivocally that the prohibition on any such population transfer was categorical, and that "civilian settlement in the administered territories contravenes the explicit provisions of the Fourth Geneva Convention",[166] indicating that the Prime Minister Levi Eshkol was therefore aware the promotion of settlements in the West Bank would be illegal.'

 

[ralliann]

'They are there involuntarily' means they are involuntarily being shot? And so are not military. And those not being shot (involuntarily) are military? So the 63 Palestinian children killed by Israeli forces since this bloodbath began I guess were military, right up to the point where they were killed. Then they become innocent children.

At least 101 children killed in the West Bank this year

An eight-year-old boy shot dead in the street is one of the most recent casualties of violence in the occupied West Bank.

www.savethechildren.net

Ye gods, what a shambles. You know nothing about this, do you. If it wasn't so serious I'd call it Pythonesque.

EWW to big of a word for me right there at the end. I am an unwashed uneducted.

• Little soldiers, you think this fake?

As young as six years old. Who is responsible for this?
You think their bullets are safer than their big soldiers?

 

[Bradskii]

EWW to big of a word for me right there at the end. I am an unwashed uneducted.

• Little soldiers, you think this fake?

View attachment 340883




View attachment 340882

I didn't think you'd stoop so low as to imply that the children were not innocent. It was done earlier in the thread. I didn't expect it to happen again. Shame on you.

 

[ralliann]

I didn't think you'd stoop so low as to imply that the children were not innocent. It was done earlier in the thread. I didn't expect it to happen again. Shame on you.

Who is doing this? Don't stick your head in the sand. It isnt shame on me, it is shame on them . How twisted are you to blame me for this. Shame on you sir, SHAME ON YOU.
THIS IS THEIR CHILD ABUSE. NOT MINE,NOT ISRAEL.
They raped, chopped off babies heads, burned them alive when they attacked Israel. Why on EARTH DO YOU THINK THIS IS anyone else's fault what these people do?