"Christian Deconversion"?
The following contains some of my thoughts on the subject which recently resurfaced after
pondering on the content of the exchange of comments between zoidar and Clare73.
I'm just sharing how it was for me. I have come to the conclusion it's not the same for everyone. God is not limited to a box. Each Christian has his/her own story. Is their true confession; i.e., agreeing with God (about your sin) without faith?
www.christianforums.com
post #44 - zoidar said:
I'm saying people seem to receive the Holy Spirit in different ways. I as I confessed
being a sinner in need of forgiveness, others when being prayed for, yet others from
listening to a sermon or just reading the Bible. As we receive the Holy Spirit the
outcome is the same for all, living faith. ****Doctrines don't have much to do with it.
Salvation is not a matter of doctrine, but doctrines can help us stay on course.****
Clare73 replied:
So what is the object of your faith? See Ro 3:25.
Salvation certainly is a matter of doctrine, especially when we as followers of Christ
point to the scriptures to provide the answer to the most important question that all
must answer ..."What must I do to be saved?"
Lately I've come across many YouTube videos and articles that feature "Christian"
deconversion stories. Whether or not these professing Christians where ever genuine
followers of Christ is of course an issue intrinsic to the issue of the eternal
security of the believer [and can never, in my opinion, be settled on a subjective
level since we cannot know with assurance if any person other than ourselves is,
or ever was the genuine article].
Instead, the answer can only be found through the objective truths that the scriptures
provide to the question, "Will any Holy Spirit regenerated person ever permanently renounce
their faith in Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior [and/or the faith once delivered to
the saints - Jude 1:3]?
Contained within the many deconversion testimonies I've heard over the years, there are
two tragic recurring common denominators that I've noticed. First, the virtual equating
of allegiance to their particular church denomination [or group of people] with
allegiance to their God. In other words, to depart from their particular religious
organization = departing from their God. [i.e - a person cannot possibly serve or walk
with God apart from being attached to an organized church group].
Secondly, and intricately related to the first point, these "deconverters" make
statements providing compelling evidence that they never had a firm grasp at all
concerning the question, "what must I do to be saved"?. Frequently they say that
it was their water baptism that saved them, or their service to the Pastor, church
etc., etc.
In other words, did these people ever truly believe that it is only "by grace through
faith and not of works" that a person can be saved with such admissions? They often
complain about their inability to have confidence in answering that question [when they
were "Christians"] since there are so many conflicting opinions. Most say that they
had never even come to the assurance that God had forgiven them of all of their sins
[one day they believe they are on the way to Heaven, the next they believe they are on
their way to the Lake of Fire ... depending on their behavior ... from day to day].
It appears to me that they have little to no understanding of what Christ's shed
blood accomplished for all those who have placed all their hope, faith, and trust
on His finished work ... rather than even 1% of their own works for their justified
status. It appears to me that no regenerated person will ever permanently renounce
their faith in Jesus Christ as their Lord and Savior [and/or the faith once delivered
to the saints - Jude 1:3].
To further illustrate my points [although certainly not to provide compelling evidence
for my position], consider the following excerpts taken from one of the many Christian
deconversion websites entitled, "Graceful Atheist" :
"DECONVERSION FROM CHRISTIANITY"
A VERY COMMON MESSAGE
Atheism, Deconstruction, Deconversion, Humanism
A Deconversion Story [by David] :
These kinds of messages have become cliché, but I find the need to write it anyway.
Mostly this is an attempt to communicate to my friends and family as succinctly but
thoroughly as possible the what and the why of my deconversion from Christianity.
This is also for those of you readers who have had doubts and have struggled to keep
them contained.
What I am
I am no longer a Christian. In the summer of 2015 after it became increasing more
difficult to hold my beliefs against surmounting evidence to the contrary I admitted
to myself I no longer believed. I was a Christian for approximately 27 years, until
the Jenga tower of contradiction between belief and facts came crashing down. I could
no longer sustain the mental effort it required to maintain belief against the overwhelming
lack of evidence for that belief.
I am an atheist. Others, wiser than I, have pointed out that this does not tell you very
much about me. To say that I am not something is not very descriptive. The list of things
I am not is infinite. But I am not afraid of this moniker. I am not a theist. This means
I do not believe in God or gods. I do not believe in the supernatural of any kind.
The natural is more than sufficient.
Which Faith?
I happened to grow up in the United States in a nominally Christian household. When
I became a Christian in my late teens it was within the context of a culture soaked
with Christian themes. But what if I had been born in Saudi Arabia? Wouldn’t I have
become a Muslim? What about India? A Sikh or a Hindu? How can I honestly say I would
have become a Christian if I had been raised in a different culture. The answer is I can’t.
I contend we are both atheists, I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you
understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I
dismiss yours.
Even within Christianity we have a tremendous amount of disagreement. Catholics and
Protestants. Evangelical and Main liners. There are something like 2000 different Christian
sects alone. As an evangelical we call many of them cults. But how do we determine what is
a cult and what is gospel?
How does one determine whether one faith is more right than another? If your answer is the
bible re-read the line about 2000 different sects of Christianity. Most of them use the same
Christian bible.
Even within a narrow group like Evangelicals , who or what decides between two contradictory
beliefs? Is pre-destination correct or is it human choice? Is baptism submersion or will a
sprinkling do? Is it pure grace or good works that saves a person? I had strong opinions on
each of these as do those who would have disagreed with me. But there is no way to determine
which is true and which is false.
It comes down to cultural microcosms. If you were raised Baptist, then pre-destination is true.
If you were raise Pentecostal then speaking in tongues is true. All the while both groups point
to the other with disdain.
It was when I began to look at what my in-group considered to be cults trying to understand why
a person would believe these “crazy” things, that it occurred to me that they saw my beliefs as
just as crazy. And atheists thought we were all crazy."