Life in the time of the Dinosaurs was different to modern life

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Not according to the Bible.

Humans are tripartites, made in the image and likeness of God from the dust of the ground.

Apes are beasts of the field.

According to God's own creation, humans are apes. We share genetics with apes, we have the same body plan and body form (minus one or two things) as apes. For every definition of the word, we are apes.

 

[AV1611VET]

According to God's own creation, humans are apes.

No -- according to academia, humans are apes.

We share genetics with apes,

No -- we have the same make-up with apes.

... we have the same body plan and body form (minus one or two things) as apes.

No -- we have plus two more things as apes: souls and spirits.

For every definition of the word, we are apes.

Only on paper.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Only on paper.

You need to realize that that same phrase can easily be turned on you too.

Humans are apes. So it upsets you. Big whoop.

 

[AV1611VET]

Humans are apes. So it upsets you.

Ya -- about as much as Weebles upset.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Ya -- about as much as Weebles upset.

No, but you are clearly upset over the fact that humans are apes.

 

[AV1611VET]

No, but you are clearly upset over the fact that humans are apes.

Ya -- about as much as Weebles are upset.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Ya -- about as much as Weebles are upset.

I have a feeling we're just going to be stuck into a loop with this.

 

[AV1611VET]

I have a feeling we're just going to be stuck into a loop with this.

That loop is going to change when the Redeemer shows up.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

When there are humans at the local zoo in enclosures, alongside
apes and gorillas, I would still not believe we are related.

Man classifies himself as little more than a brute beast
aimlessly walking this Earth. Evolutionists claim that if
one creature is physically similar to another, it is
evidence of a common ancestor.

Science remains undecided and conflicted as to the exact origin of
life. Even the very definition of life is contested and rewritten.
Some say we are all Martians originally.

God is a creator, he creates and so does man, who are creators and
inventors. Can apes think or reason, write, read, compose music, or
drive cars, or understand mathematics and chemistry. They lack the
mental capacity to do any of these beyond the most rudimentary level.

Man can fly to the moon and back, they can contemplate there origins.
They even built weapons that can destroy all life on earth many times.
The great apes of Africa facing threat from the Ebola virus cannot make
a cure for themselfs.The human mind is vastly superior to the animal brain.

I know this is a science forum not a religious forum but
Evolution Is Religion, Not Science

And Natural Selection: An Answer to Everything.
-

Also Some people today would confess there sins against "Mother Earth"
—used to refer to the planet Earth as a woman or a goddess, rather
then confess there other sins to the creator of everything made.

Scientists even looking to the creature rather than the Creator for
their instruction in how to live (e.g. Romans 1:252 - Timothy 3)
“Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools”.
"ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth."

He created humans after the God kind Genesis 1:26-27.
We mate only after our kind, and have dominion over the animals.
Modern Science and human history proves that.

Your predecessors didn't agree.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Not according to the Bible.

Don't care.

Humans are tripartites, made in the image and likeness of God from the dust of the ground.

This must be some claim of your bible, because it is not correct. Humans are not made of dust. You can check the composition of dust and humans and compare, or you could find out if humans grow by consuming dust.

Apes are beasts of the field.

The only apes laboring in fields are humans.

 

[AV1611VET]

Don't care.

Some do though:

What's an ape in your opinion?

At least, enough to ask.

This must be some claim of your bible,

Indeed it is:

Genesis 2:7 And the LORD God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

... because it is not correct.

That's your opinion, of course.

Humans are not made of dust.

That too is your opinion, of course.

The Bible says otherwise though:

Genesis 18:27 And Abraham answered and said, Behold now, I have taken upon me to speak unto the Lord, which am but dust and ashes:

You can check the composition of dust and humans and compare, or you could find out if humans grow by consuming dust.

Just like God took sea water and made land, He can take land and make man.

I've discussed God converting the dust of the ground to CHNO molecules before.

Would you like me to look it up?

The only apes laboring in fields are humans.

EARTH -- not FIELDS.

Genesis 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

Do you know the difference?

 

[ruthiesea]

Science finds that Animals reproduce after there own kind.
Why not group them in that way like God does.

Define the term ‘kind’. Science doesn’t.

 

[AV1611VET]

Define the term ‘kind’. Science doesn’t.

Kind = Genus

genus (n.)

(Latin plural genera), 1550s as a term of logic, "kind or class of things" (biological sense dates from c. 1600), from Latin genus (genitive generis) "race, stock, kind; family, birth, descent, origin"

SOURCE: Online Etymology Dictionary

 

[Hans Blaster]

EARTH -- not FIELDS.

Genesis 1:24 And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so.

Do you know the difference?

You wrote "beasts of the field" and that *sure* sounds like an animal toiling in a field. (This reminds me -- this ape needs to dig his garden.)

Does "earth" mean "soil"? (Since it is not capitalized as "Earth" to mean the planet.) What are the beasts of the soil? Do they have to live in the soil? (Earthworms, gophers, ants) Or what?

 

[Hans Blaster]

Just like God took sea water and made land, He can take land and make man.

The secondary component of sea water is salt (NaCl). The kind of land that you can make from sea water is a salt flat.

I've discussed God converting the dust of the ground to CHNO molecules before.

Would you like me to look it up?

Fulminic acid? No I really don't want to see your version of chemistry.

 

[Semper-Fi]

Define the term ‘kind’. Science doesn’t.

So Can humans mate and have offspring with anything other then humans?
No they can not, Humans [a kind] can mate with other humans only for offspring.
A dog [another kind] can not mate with cats[another kind], to produce offspring.

 

[AV1611VET]

You wrote "beasts of the field" and that *sure* sounds like an animal toiling in a field. (This reminds me -- this ape needs to dig his garden.)

Does "earth" mean "soil"? (Since it is not capitalized as "Earth" to mean the planet.) What are the beasts of the soil? Do they have to live in the soil? (Earthworms, gophers, ants) Or what?

Nevermind, Hans, it's over your head.

 

[AV1611VET]

Fulminic acid? No I really don't want to see your version of chemistry.

Ignorance is bliss, isn't it?

Not that you'd really understand anyway.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Nevermind, Hans, it's over your head.

Ah hah, sure it is. Or maybe you have it inverted. Your comments are beneath my feet.

 

[Hans Blaster]

Ignorance is bliss, isn't it?

Not that you'd really understand anyway.

What do you mean by "CHNO molecules" then? Try me.