- Oct 12, 2020
- 8,607
- 2,867
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Maybe it's you not being clear rather than us having a reading comprehension issue. Did you ever consider that. You did say this:Your reading comprehension at times simply annoys me, because one of my pet peeves is being falsely accused of something. If anyone is misrepresenting anyone, it is some of you all misreprenting me by claiming I'm saying things I'm not. I never once said Amils claim that there is little difference between the thousand years and satan's little season.
How are we supposed to understand this? If we're supposed to take this in a literal, straightforward way then you misrepresented Amil. Did you use any symbolic words here?DavidPT said:IOW, per Amil not much difference between the thousand years and satan's little season, at least in regards to the billions satan deceives after the thousand years.
Amil believes that the falling away that Paul wrote about in 2 Thess 2 happens during Satan's little season. Therefore, there are a lot more unsaved people during that time than there were before that time. So, what you're saying doesn't line up with what we believe about Satan's little season.
I don't understand what you said here at all. You sometimes are just not clear whether you acknowledge it or not.I'm the one claiming that if Amil is supposed to be true, and that I said, at least in regards to the billions satan deceives after the thousand years. You all, meaning Amils like yourself, seem to do that with some of the Revelation 20 as well, misrepresenting what it is saying by having it meaning something it isn't, IOW twisting it in order to not contradict Amil. But that's not how it's supposed to work.
No, it doesn't.An example---Revelation 20:4---which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands. This clearly proves that the beast ascends out of the pit, not after the thousand years, but prior to it instead.
This is all based on your ASSUMPTION that Revelation 20 is only referring to people who are martyred during a literal 42 month period that precedes the return of Christ. I disagree with that interpretation, so you haven't proven anything to me.Yet, you all insist that the beast doesn't ascend out of the pit until after the thousand years, thus misrepresenting what Revelation 20:4 records, as if those saints can somehow by martyred for refusing to worsip the beast, and his image, before the beast even ascends out of the pit first, and a 2nd one out of the earth. IOW, in regards to these particular martyrs, let's just ignore Revelation 13 since none of that could possibly be involving why they are martyred to begin with.
Revelation 20:4 and those particular martyrs which had not worshiped the beast, is key to determining where the thousand years fit, since their martyrdom is a result of the 42 month reign of the beast once it ascends out of the pit.
Upvote
0