coffee4u
Well-Known Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 5,005
- 2,817
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Agreed...but liberal cities have been changing which crimes they hold you for pretty drastically.
I would not be surprised.
I don't think it's something like murder or rape....theft? Dunno. Indecent exposure? Dunno. I think it's fair to assume it's non-violent.
Is there even indecent exposure anymore?
You heard about the man who walked around the female dressing room at a spa claiming to be a woman with his equipment (aroused) on show to women and at least 1 child and yet when a woman complained about that she was told she was the problem.
When I was a child he would have been arrested.
It's definitely written a certain way to lead to that conclusion....and it's certainly possible.
I think it's safe to assume that he placed that person there on purpose. I have to imagine they have policy that dictates otherwise.
But could there be other reasons? If they got booked, they got printed, they got a criminal record check. If they had a history of messing with children? Beating women? Those could be reasons.
How about this....one of the apprehending police was black and this person dropped an a-bomb? Possible.
Many possible reasons but trans is trending right now so its going to be used, if it was the reason or not. I would say right now it's the top minority, forget about being black, the woman who complained at the spa was black.
None of this makes this treatment justified....but I hate that this is the news now. Let's assume motives, let's assume victimhood, let's get the reader outraged.
Not at all justified, they should have been in a solitary cell.
The whole point is to cause outrage. People are being played like a fiddle.
Is anyone looking at the police who went against policy and placed them in that shared cell?
It's Nick Sandman all over again. It's creating a culture that I'm beginning to despise.
Think of that story, that picture, and you know how it was depicted. MAGA wearing Trump loving white boy is jumping in the face of ancient native American activist who peacefully plays the drum...because he hates that the genocide his ancestors committed didn't finish them off.
If I had suggested that perhaps a racist hate group of black hebrew Israelites were the instigators, this kid just stood up for himself, and the native American inserted himself into the situation for reasons unknown....
I'd have been laughed at.
I had to look up his name, but I recognized him, we even heard about that over here.
We don't have to assume motives and viewpoints to get the news. The news definitely wants us to though.
Here's the weird thing. I can tell people understand they aren't really being reasonable with this stuff. I've only really begun to figure out how to deconvert atheists from it though.
You think? Maybe depends who they are, some of the younger people are in hook line and sinker.
I think it's wider spread then just atheists. You would know what your own community is following more than I would, but there are plenty of left spiritual types. I was watching a video that showed a church where they asked all the people who fall under one of those letters to come up on stage. One was a little boy/girl whose mother said they were trans. I can't remember if they were suppose to be trans female or male, I couldn't even tell. The mother was pushing the child to get on stage and speak on the microphone and the kid kept pushing it back and got off that stage as fast as they could. Whether that child was trans or not, they didn't want to be up there. So it's seen as perfectly okay for parents (notice its nearly always the mother while the father is silent) to push the kid into being a little activist but other parents are supposedly abusive for simply saying "No, boys can't change into girls" when the child asks. Kids ask and say all kind of stuff. They don't even know what a boy or a girl is let alone understand what changing gender actually means for their body for the rest of their lives.
Most little kids will at some point tell you they are a lion or Princess Peach, it means nothing. My son's favourite colour was purple and he would wear a purple skirt pretending to be waluigi when he was 5. Like sensible parents we ignored it, I bought him a purple tshirt because that is what he really wanted and let him play. We didn't go "Oh he's wearing a skirt and he likes purple he must really be a girl!"
I wanted to be a boy when I was little, many girls did because boys got to do more fun stuff. It had nothing to do with actually wanting to change our bodies. It was called being a kid. Adults ignored it and we grew up and were fine with whatever we were. These days they risk being rushed off to a gender clinic.
I'd argue it's even worse than that....yes, you can say that the rational self interest of these identity groups are aligning themselves with the Democratic party to benefit from it.
I tend to think that when people tell you who they are....then you should believe them. There's a certain arrogance that comes from the person saying "I'm a Marxist" and believing it won't hurt their movement one bit. It's not a dog whistle...it's a bullhorn to every other Marxist. They're literally proving that the people supporting them not only don't know anything about Marxists....they don't care.
It's a signal to all other Marxists.
When someone says that they are using concepts from "Critical Race Theory" but they say they aren't teaching "Critical Race Theory"....they're literally pointing out "these people have no idea what a critical theory is".
I had a guy, no joke, say that the "critical" meant critical thinking. I told him (because I knew he was a communist, he's admitted it openly) that I could quote one of the guy's who came up with "critical theories" aka critical pedagogy on the difference between a critical theory and a traditional theory...and told him that we can then talk about which one employs critical thinking.
He left the thread.
I've always known about Marxism, if not every version of it, but I didn't know much about critical theory. Now I'm just trying to figure out how to present this stuff to Christians lol.
Shame they are not teaching critical thinking, then maybe people would start waking up to all this rot.
Lol I am a Christian. I think this surpasses the boxes of atheists on this side and Christians on the other. I find them in both camps.
Send them over to Candice Owens she would whip them into shape.
I would vote for her, except I'm not American and she isn't running for president. If she were white nobody would listen to her, thank God she is black.
Upvote
0