What if Jesus comes tomorrow and it turns out these scriptures mean exactly as they read?

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
28,322
13,543
72
✟370,359.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Saint Martin translated it into German. Saint William translated into English. Still none of them wrote a single book of the Bible.

Not to mention the various martyrs such as John Wycliffe who were killed by the RCC for advocating the use of vernacular translations of the Bible so that every literate person could read the word of God in their own language rather than an arcane and difficult language.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: pescador
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,362
3,122
Minnesota
✟215,390.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Not to mention the various martyrs such as John Wycliffe who were killed by the RCC for advocating the use of vernacular translations of the Bible so that every literate person could read the word of God in their own language rather than an arcane and difficult language.
False. The Catholic Church not only chose the 73 books of the Bible, but preached, preserved, and translated Biblical text into many common languages. A number of Catholics translated Biblical text into early English long before Wycliffe.
 
Upvote 0

pescador

Wise old man
Site Supporter
Nov 29, 2011
8,530
4,776
✟498,844.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
False. The Catholic Church not only chose the 73 books of the Bible, but preached, preserved, and translated Biblical text into many common languages. A number of Catholics translated Biblical text into early English long before Wycliffe.

And your proof of this is ..?
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,362
3,122
Minnesota
✟215,390.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
And your proof of this is ..?
If we are talking very early in England then Venerable Bede, a Catholic monk, is perhaps the best known for his translation in the 700s. King Alfred the Great had not finished his translation of Psalms before he died,
that would have been in the 800s, but I found a website that contains some of his translations in a manuscript dated around 1050. These are in the English of the Saxons: The Illustrated Psalms of Alfred the Great: The Old English Paris Psalter When the Normans took over the English changed, the paraphrase of Orm is dated around 1150 and is an example in what some call Middle English. Now remember that when the Protestants took over they seized the monasteries and gave the land to wealthy Protestants. Communities were dependent on the monasteries, it was very sad, but also sad is that many manuscripts were destroyed. So we have accounts of various translations as well, but as you can see for yourself some English Biblical text did indeed survive, and the translations were long before Protestants and Wycliffe.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,362
3,122
Minnesota
✟215,390.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Not to mention the various martyrs such as John Wycliffe who were killed by the RCC for advocating the use of vernacular translations of the Bible so that every literate person could read the word of God in their own language rather than an arcane and difficult language.
Wycliffe died of a stroke, no Catholics were involved. But you're right that Catholics killed Protestants, but don't forget Protestants killed Catholics. Recall that Catholics who fled to France and translated the Bible into English (the Douay-Rheims Bible) faced torture or death in England for possessing or distributing that Bible. Go to the Tower of London and there a Catholic martyrs entombed there at the back of the chapel, you can read their name.. I just gave a couple of examples of Catholics who translated Biblical text into English before Wycliffe, those are perhaps the best known but there are more. The Wycliffe Bible used mostly Latin texts, the Catholic Latin Vulgate was named so because Latin was the "vulgar" or common language of Christians in Europe at the time. Catholics not only preached and preserved the Bible over all of these centuries but translated Biblical text into numerous common languages.
 
Upvote 0

FredVB

Regular Member
Mar 11, 2010
4,537
927
America
Visit site
✟268,391.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Valletta said:
Wycliffe died of a stroke, no Catholics were involved. But you're right that Catholics killed Protestants, but don't forget Protestants killed Catholics. Recall that Catholics who fled to France and translated the Bible into English (the Douay-Rheims Bible) faced torture or death in England for possessing or distributing that Bible. Go to the Tower of London and there a Catholic martyrs entombed there at the back of the chapel, you can read their name.. I just gave a couple of examples of Catholics who translated Biblical text into English before Wycliffe, those are perhaps the best known but there are more. The Wycliffe Bible used mostly Latin texts, the Catholic Latin Vulgate was named so because Latin was the "vulgar" or common language of Christians in Europe at the time. Catholics not only preached and preserved the Bible over all of these centuries but translated Biblical text into numerous common languages.

I have read that Wycliffe and others were martyred by the Church, and also that the Catholic church was not favoring translations of the Bible to the language of the laypeople. I wonder what is the source that can show that alternative perspective.
 
Upvote 0

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,461
5,310
✟829,428.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
I have read that Wycliffe and others were martyred by the Church, and also that the Catholic church was not favoring translations of the Bible to the language of the laypeople. I wonder what is the source that can show that alternative perspective.
Well, there were no protestants at that time; they were different times and he was working outside the authority given to him by the Church; BTW, are you sure you are not thinking about Tyndale?

The Douay-Rheims Bible was Catholic, and was in english, but somewhat later.
 
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
28,322
13,543
72
✟370,359.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I have read that Wycliffe and others were martyred by the Church, and also that the Catholic church was not favoring translations of the Bible to the language of the laypeople. I wonder what is the source that can show that alternative perspective.

You actually were not far off the mark. Fortunately, Wycliffe preceded the Protestant Reformation significantly. Here is the great Wikipedia article - John Wycliffe - Wikipedia

From that article is the following -

The Council of Constance declared Wycliffe a heretic on 4 May 1415, and banned his writings, effectively both excommunicating him retroactively and making him an early forerunner of Protestantism. The Council decreed that Wycliffe's works should be burned and his bodily remains removed from consecrated ground. This order, confirmed by Pope Martin V, was carried out in 1428. Wycliffe's corpse was exhumed and burned and the ashes cast into the River Swift, which flows through Lutterworth.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
8,362
3,122
Minnesota
✟215,390.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
I have read that Wycliffe and others were martyred by the Church, and also that the Catholic church was not favoring translations of the Bible to the language of the laypeople. I wonder what is the source that can show that alternative perspective.
The Middle Ages were brutal, Catholics killed Protestants, Protestants killed Catholics depending upon who was in charge. If you go to that chapel at the Tower of London you will find the remains of both Catholic and Protestant martyrs. As to not favoring translations of the Bible, that myth, like so many others, has been passed down by Protestants. The grain of truth, which makes such tales sound plausible, is that the Catholic Church was against anti-Catholic translations of the Bible--those who inserted hateful diatribes against the Church, those who added or subtracted from the Bible. It is not true that Catholics wrote the Bible in Latin so that the people could not understand it, the truth is that Saint Jerome translated Biblical text into many languages, the most famous is the Latin Vulgate. By the time of Jerome Latin was the language of the people of Europe--if you could read or write you spoke Latin. Thus the translation into the common, or "vulgar" Latin--from which the Vulgate drew its' name. Latin eventually morphed into Italian, French, Spanish, so there were plenty of translations of Biblical text by Catholics. As to England, before Wycliffe there were many translations by Catholics. To mention just a few of them, Venerable Bede, a Catholic monk, is perhaps the best known for his translation in the 700s. King Alfred the Great had not finished his translation of Psalms before he died, that would have been in the 800s. Now a lot of Biblical texts by Catholics have been destroyed, remember Protestants in England seized Catholic monasteries and gave the land to wealthy Protestants. But some do exist, you can find some of Alfred’s translations in a manuscript dated as around 1050. These are in the English of the Saxons: The Illustrated Psalms of Alfred the Great: The Old English Paris Psalter When the Normans took over the English changed, the paraphrase of Orm is dated around 1150 and is an example of a translation into Middle English. The Catholic Church has strongly preached, defended, translated, and protected the Bible, and denounced those over the centuries who would add or subtract from the Word of God.
 
Upvote 0

bbbbbbb

Well-Known Member
Jun 9, 2015
28,322
13,543
72
✟370,359.00
Faith
Non-Denom
I can hardly imagine Peter allowing himself to be called "Holy Father".

Much less having a bronze statue made of himself with people kissing the foot.
upload_2021-9-9_7-49-46.jpeg
 
Upvote 0

Ceallaigh

May God be with you and bless you.
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
19,182
9,971
.
✟608,466.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
30,461
5,310
✟829,428.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Doesn't seem to go with him in all humility asking to be crucified upside down.

Sure, but out of respect for Peter, and his confession of faith, it's one way of showing appreciation for his faithful example to all of us. I don't have an issue with that any more than I do with those who kiss the cross during the liturgy of the adoration of the Holy Cross on Good Friday. Symbolic devotion; which is what Liturgy is. It is not for God (or Peter); liturgy and the sacraments are gifts from God, for us!
 
Upvote 0

Root of Jesse

Admiral of the Fleet/First Sea Lord
Site Supporter
Jun 23, 2011
18,910
3,646
Bay Area, California
Visit site
✟354,065.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I have read that Wycliffe and others were martyred by the Church, and also that the Catholic church was not favoring translations of the Bible to the language of the laypeople. I wonder what is the source that can show that alternative perspective.
Regarding not favoring translations, what do you mean? For example, if someone translated something inaccurately, according to 'the authority' (which the Catholic Church was, at the time) what should they do, let it continue to be translated inaccurately? Or publicly demand that the translation is wrong and needs to be changed? FWIW, the authority was the only one who could reserve the right to translate the Bible. Why? It was the authority, according to Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Root of Jesse

Admiral of the Fleet/First Sea Lord
Site Supporter
Jun 23, 2011
18,910
3,646
Bay Area, California
Visit site
✟354,065.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
I can hardly imagine Peter allowing himself to be called "Holy Father".
Well, he did allow his name to be changed to "Rock". I don't know what it is with protestants and titles. And it's not a matter of what he allows himself to be called. The people of Rome first called the pope the pope. It wasn't something the man said "You should call me pope from now on."
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Root of Jesse

Admiral of the Fleet/First Sea Lord
Site Supporter
Jun 23, 2011
18,910
3,646
Bay Area, California
Visit site
✟354,065.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Much less having a bronze statue made of himself with people kissing the foot.
View attachment 305623
I don't know, there's lots of statues around Rome. And the Church doesn't tell people they must kiss the toe. They do allow people their own private devotions.
 
Upvote 0