Just curious: why do you assert mutation produces information, when sin could produce masses of it?

[Gottservant]

Hi there,

So if sin could produce masses of mutation (dysfunctional DNA), why would you not expect it to produce masses of information?

I mean that is just a one for one interpretation of the special place you give "mutation" - am I not correct?

There is no telling what species could get ahead of other species, the Evolutionary way?

I think there is a paucity of rigor, here, that needs to be answered theoretically...

 

[Ophiolite]

• Why would you expect sin to produce masses of mutation?
• What evidence do you have that sin has anything to do with mutation?
• Can you offer any scientific evidence that sin has anything to do with evolution?
• Why should a "special place" for mutation have any correlation with sin?
• You've been told before: one species "get's ahead" of another through having a suite of characteristics that make it more successful in a given environment than other species in that environment. Do you understand what that means yet? If not, why not?
• There is certainly a paucity of rigrour. One might justifiably say that there is a complete absence of rigour. However, that relates to your arguments, your understanding and your foolish questions.

 

[Warden_of_the_Storm]

Sin is to do with religion, while evolution is to do with biology.
Not the same thing.

 

[Phred]

Well, once I sinned and I mutated. I think the sin caused the mutation. So I went to confession and the priest mutated. But he's still a priest. Just now he's an armadillo too. Is that speciation?

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

Well, once I sinned and I mutated. I think the sin caused the mutation. So I went to confession and the priest mutated. But he's still a priest. Just now he's an armadillo too. Is that speciation?

Sounds like some sort of absolution...