Soyeong
Well-Known Member
- Mar 10, 2015
- 12,706
- 4,688
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Single
When God has commanded something and you think that Paul spoke against obeying what God commanded, then you have a decision to make about who has the higher authority and which one to follow, but the reality is that Paul was a servant of God, so he never did that. Those verse are speaking about not raising questions in regard to whether it had previously been offered to idols, not speaking against obeying God.
"Arise, Peter, kill and eat..."
Acts 10:14-15 But Peter said, “By no means, Lord; for I have never eaten anything that is common or unclean.” 15 And the voice came to him again a second time, “What God has made clean, do not call common.”
It should be noted that Peter did not just object by saying that he had never eaten anything that was unclean, but also added that he had never eaten anything that was common. Furthermore, God only rebuked Peter for his use of the word "common" and not for his use of the word "unclean". In other words, Peter had correctly identified the unclean animals as unclean and had correctly declined to eat them in obedience to God's commands in Leviticus 11 and Deuteronomy 14, but he had incorrectly identified the clean animals as common and had incorrectly declined to eat them in disobedience to God's command to kill and eat. So Peter's vision had nothing to do with a change in the status is unclean animals, but rather he interpreted his vision three times as being in regard to incorrectly identifying Gentiles.
Upvote
0