Again, these were not evidentiary hearings. All you need is a strong belief to file a case, you don't need evidence at all. A judge is supposed to allow you to seek out the evidence, that means filing subpoenas for records and witnesses, such as election workers and computer records. Then witnesses can be crossed examined, those are real hearings--perhaps you don't watch much television. Then, based upon the testimony, you may seek further evidence as per order of the court. Had such a hearing occurred some new entity would have covered it. If you think such a hearing took place please put out a link to the video. I've actually filed a case in federal court against government agencies, it dragged out for years but was quite successful, but one day the lead litigator remarked to me that half of the judges would not have allowed the case to go forward because it was against federal agencies (powerful ones) and a federal judge simply did not want to take them on. We know that attorneys who took the case for Trump were threatened, it would not surprise me that it happened to judges. We are moving toward a totalitarian state, I am worried that future elections are going to be a lot like those in Russia where the opposition voices are quickly silenced.
