Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Your post is not exactly coherent. Your belief has nothing to do with it. How natural selection works is well understood. It appears that all you have is denial of science while the other side has mountains of evidence. If you ever watch court trials the side with all of the evidence wins. Creationists cannot seem to demonstrate any scientific evidence for their beliefs. Do you care to explain their failures?
And...what evidence do you have that horses or any other "kind" was just spawned out of nothing? Are horses made of something specific like how Adam and Eve were supposedly made from dust? Perhaps oats? It's fascinating the lengths one will go to in order to just avoid acknowledging the problems with a literal inerrantist interpretation of a text clearly not meant to be scientific except by a stretch of that word.
Not at all. Dog breeds were deliberately bred by people with a specific objective in mind. However, if the genetic information was not contained in the original mongrel dogs, they could not have been selectively bred. And never will I accept that adaptation is evolution.
No one said horses themselves pop out of that, because evolution doesn't work that way,, showing that you don't remotely understand that it's a gradual process and isn't just spontaneous to that degree, as if humans just poofed out of primordial soup, no, it was billions of years leading to human ancestors we can trace back in fossil record and even DNA to an extent
Dogs from prior ancestors that they share with other canids and general carnivores. Or do you just throw out taxonomy entirely because you don't agree with the classification based on common ancestry rather than "I Dream of Genie" popping stuff out of nowhere?
People come across mysteries all the time. Recently, a metal pole appeared for no apparent reason in Arizona. Was it formed over millions of years by volcanic action or some kind of crystal growth? No way. That theory is utterly implausible. No animal could done it. It had all the hallmarks of a human's work. I find it just as implausible as life evolving from nothing. The reason I believe that God created all that we see is simple. He said so. I see the evidence of what He did before my eyes. And who decided that science was some kind of infallible god that everyone must bow down and worship? Science is as good or bad as humanity itself. Evolution is bad science. I could care less about science. My interest is in truth. If science happens to stumble on truth, good. Evolution denies truth.
No abiogenesis, no evolution. It's yet another dishonest intellectual trick by evolutionist to dodge an issue that they cannot explain. There are a number of sources that explain how animals could indeed be saved by Noah's Ark. Of course, none of these are acceptable because they don't fit evolutionist prejudices.
Noah's Ark
Not true. First life could have been planted here. It could have been magically poofed into existence. Or it could have arisen naturally. Only the thread qualifies as abiogenesis.
Abiogenesis is so far fetched that it is virtually impossible. Check out Professor James Tour for the best explanation as to why. 70 years of research has proven fruitless. If it can't be done in a lab, how is it possible in nature? Oh, I know. The Evolution Fairy sprinkled Evo dust on a dirt puddle in Africa. Now all we need to know is where the Evolution Fairy came from. And where she is now. We want answers! Not the truth, that would be too much.
