• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

What about these Hunter Biden emails?

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Ratcliffe = not trustworthy.
Why?....Because he is a political lapdog like Eric Holder and Loretta (all we talked about was our grandkids) Lynch?
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Is it nepotism?
And your solution to this 'problem' of people trying to curry favor with a presidents relatives is what?....prohibit them from having friends?.....forbid them from owning businesses?....stop them from traveling to foreign countries?
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Is Hunter Biden calling his father for advice illegal?
Of course not....unless he receives compensation for it (especially if it is unreported as required by law)....which this sounds like:
The email includes a note that “Hunter has some office expectations he will elaborate.” A proposed equity split references “20” for “H” and “10 held by H for the big guy?” with no further details.

"The reference to 'the Big Guy' in the much publicized May 13, 2017 email is in fact a reference to Joe Biden," Bobulinski said in a statement to Fox News.

Hunter Biden business partner calls email 'genuine,' says Hunter sought dad's advice on deals
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
24,902
20,975
✟1,736,757.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Why?....Because he is a political lapdog like Eric Holder and Loretta (all we talked about was our grandkids) Lynch?

Eric Holder and Lorretta Lynch were both highly qualified professionals with a long resume in the legal profession.

Ratcliffe has zero experience or expertise in the intelligence field. He is nothing more than a political hack, carrying out the whims of his boss.
.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Eric Holder and Lorretta Lynch were both highly qualified professionals with a long resume in the legal profession.
And yet they still ended up being political hacks.
It has nothing to do with experience or qualifications.....
]"Political hack", also called partisan hack, is a pejorative term describing a person who is part of the political party apparatus, but whose intentions are more aligned with victory than personal conviction. The term "hired gun" is often used in tandem to further describe the moral bankruptcy of the "hack"......wiki
 
  • Like
Reactions: Darkhorse
Upvote 0

Triumvirate

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2020
1,200
1,517
41
London
✟21,962.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I'll just wait patiently for a proportionately greater level of outrage over basically anything dodgy members of the US Royal Family (Kushner, Ivanka, the failsons, etc.) have done to a far greater degree over the last four years.

If you are outraged over a single email from H. Biden, you'll blow your top when you find out what the current administration has been up to - if you care about truth and not being a hypocrite, of course.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Triumvirate

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2020
1,200
1,517
41
London
✟21,962.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
And your solution to this 'problem' of people trying to curry favor with a presidents relatives is what?....prohibit them from having friends?.....forbid them from owning businesses?....stop them from traveling to foreign countries?

Well, there's quite a few bits of legislation and political norms in the US built in to prevent precisely these sorts of situation arising, mainly on declaring interests and prohibiting certain kinds of contacts.

Were you unaware of these laws?
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Well, there's quite a few bits of legislation and political norms in the US built in to prevent precisely these sorts of situation arising, mainly on declaring interests and prohibiting certain kinds of contacts.

Were you unaware of these laws?
Maybe you could list a few of them?
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
24,902
20,975
✟1,736,757.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And yet they still ended up being political hacks.
It has nothing to do with experience or qualifications.....
]"Political hack", also called partisan hack, is a pejorative term describing a person who is part of the political party apparatus, but whose intentions are more aligned with victory than personal conviction. The term "hired gun" is often used in tandem to further describe the moral bankruptcy of the "hack"......wiki

Sure, the most qualified professional can be a political hack.
The current DNI has no qualifications nor experience in the Intelligence field...yet he, as the DNI, is the head of 17 intelligence related agencies. The only plausible reason an unqualified person was assigned is political hackery (word?).
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
And I would assume this is the penalty for doing so:
(c)
An individual appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced in violation of this section is not entitled to pay, and money may not be paid from the Treasury as pay to an individual so appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced.

Same as I pointed out in an earlier post on this thread. So if someone is working in a position but accepts no pay (Ivanka and Trump Jr.).........?
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,873
7,590
Columbus
✟756,257.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
The only plausible reason an unqualified person was assigned is political hackery (word?).
And the evidence to support that assumption is......?
 
Upvote 0

SimplyMe

Senior Veteran
Jul 19, 2003
10,617
10,363
the Great Basin
✟401,277.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Triumvirate

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2020
1,200
1,517
41
London
✟21,962.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,393
13,840
Earth
✟241,227.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
And I would assume this is the penalty for doing so:
(c)
An individual appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced in violation of this section is not entitled to pay, and money may not be paid from the Treasury as pay to an individual so appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced.

Same as I pointed out in an earlier post on this thread. So if someone is working in a position but accepts no pay (Ivanka and Trump Jr.).........?
They’re not being paid so they can run the government the way that they want?

You really wanna make a stand on that?
 
Upvote 0

Triumvirate

Well-Known Member
Oct 22, 2020
1,200
1,517
41
London
✟21,962.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
They’re not being paid so they can run the government the way that they want?

You really wanna make a stand on that?

I'm not really sure the two things have anything to do with each other anyway, the lack of a salary is probably for a tax dodge :D
 
Upvote 0