durangodawood
Dis Member
- Aug 28, 2007
- 23,574
- 15,724
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
Upvote
0
Oh?....how so?And we’re still getting cheated!
Why?....Because he is a political lapdog like Eric Holder and Loretta (all we talked about was our grandkids) Lynch?Ratcliffe = not trustworthy.
And your solution to this 'problem' of people trying to curry favor with a presidents relatives is what?....prohibit them from having friends?.....forbid them from owning businesses?....stop them from traveling to foreign countries?Is it nepotism?
Of course not....unless he receives compensation for it (especially if it is unreported as required by law)....which this sounds like:Is Hunter Biden calling his father for advice illegal?
Why?....Because he is a political lapdog like Eric Holder and Loretta (all we talked about was our grandkids) Lynch?
And yet they still ended up being political hacks.Eric Holder and Lorretta Lynch were both highly qualified professionals with a long resume in the legal profession.
And your solution to this 'problem' of people trying to curry favor with a presidents relatives is what?....prohibit them from having friends?.....forbid them from owning businesses?....stop them from traveling to foreign countries?
Maybe you could list a few of them?Well, there's quite a few bits of legislation and political norms in the US built in to prevent precisely these sorts of situation arising, mainly on declaring interests and prohibiting certain kinds of contacts.
Were you unaware of these laws?
And yet they still ended up being political hacks.
It has nothing to do with experience or qualifications.....
]"Political hack", also called partisan hack, is a pejorative term describing a person who is part of the political party apparatus, but whose intentions are more aligned with victory than personal conviction. The term "hired gun" is often used in tandem to further describe the moral bankruptcy of the "hack"......wiki
And I would assume this is the penalty for doing so:
And the evidence to support that assumption is......?The only plausible reason an unqualified person was assigned is political hackery (word?).
Their companies and brand have benfited a great deal. Ivanka's company has had special treatment from international governments...if you call China international I guess.
How Donald Trump's Kids Have Profited Off Their Dad's Presidency
Also Japan (two different instances). There could be more that I'm not aware of, too.
They’re not being paid so they can run the government the way that they want?And I would assume this is the penalty for doing so:
(c)
An individual appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced in violation of this section is not entitled to pay, and money may not be paid from the Treasury as pay to an individual so appointed, employed, promoted, or advanced.
Same as I pointed out in an earlier post on this thread. So if someone is working in a position but accepts no pay (Ivanka and Trump Jr.).........?
They’re not being paid so they can run the government the way that they want?
You really wanna make a stand on that?