"Flat Earth" or "Globe Earth"

[SPF]

Took this photo last night the shafts of light can be seen being emitted from these impressions.

View attachment 273030

The black lines are by these light shafts.

View attachment 273032

photoshop.

 

[lasthero]

You won't believe the truth for a second, but they are scars from electrical discharge.

Ignoring, for a moment, that electricity hasn’t been observed to do anything like that...electrical discharge from what?

 

[SeventyOne]

Ignoring, for a moment, that electricity hasn’t been observed to do anything like that...electrical discharge from what?

See post 835.

 

[SPF]

Took this photo last night the shafts of light can be seen being emitted from these impressions.

View attachment 273030

The black lines are by these light shafts.

View attachment 273032

Impact! New Moon Craters Are Appearing Faster Than Thought | Space

 

[lasthero]

See post 835.

You didn’t explain it there, either, but okay.

 

[SeventyOne]

You didn’t explain it there, either, but okay.

But I offered one more detailed than I could ever write out here.

 

[lasthero]

But I offered one more detailed than I could ever write out here.

Offering an explanation and giving one are two different things. I’m fairly familiar with the whole electric universe deal, and I’m not aware of any thing in it which would explain the craters we observe on the earth and the moon. Are you at least going to share the link?

 

[SeventyOne]

Offering an explanation and giving one are two different things. I’m fairly familiar with the whole electric universe deal, and I’m not aware of any thing in it which would explain the craters we observe on the earth and the moon. Are you at least going to share the link?

I've offered to, but no one has taken me up on the offer yet.

 

[lasthero]

I've offered to, but no one has taken me up on the offer yet.

I feel like I just did, but okay - share away.

 

[lasthero]

I've offered to, but no one has taken me up on the offer yet.

Is this the stuff you're talking about?

If so, you might want to find another horse to hitch on. At no point does electric universe say that all impact craters are caused by electric discharge - it only says that SOME of them are, and they make a point of differentiating. Even if this is the explanation you want to use, you still have to explain where meteors are coming from, and now you have the added problem of explaining how the electric universe is compatible with any flat earth model.

 

[SPF]

I've offered to, but no one has taken me up on the offer yet.

Out of curiosity, do you believe that the Barringer Crater was created by a giant lightning bolt that would make Zeus proud?

 

[d taylor]

Nothing about craters there.

I was not addressing craters in Genesis, Genesis 1:9,10 shows that the earth was one land with a sea gathered in one place around the earth.

 

[d taylor]

I saw the same "halo" last evening. It is an effect that is seen when atmospheric conditions are right. Where I am located it was suspended ice crystals which makes it especially dramatic. It has nothing to do with the moon itself which is about 240,000 miles past the atmosphere.

This is pure and simple light from the moon.

 

[JackRT]

This is pure and simple light from the moon.

Yes, it is the sun's reflected light passing through the earth's atmosphere that causes the halo effect.

 

[d taylor]

Another interesting observation is that according to science meteors burn up at about 60 miles up. Meaning that the iss is 200 miles higher than the 60 miles up where meteors burn up. And according to this cosmos magazine every year the earth has about 6100 meteors reaching this 60 miles area.

It is really odd that this iss has not been knocked out of the sky over all these years being that they are fully exposed to every meteor before it reaches the burn up space at 60 miles up.

 

[lasthero]

Another interesting observation is that according to science meteors burn up at about 60 miles up. Meaning that the iss is 200 miles higher than the 60 miles up where meteors burn up.

They burn up because of the friction as they come through the atmosphere. There’s no atmosphere up where the ISS is, thus no burning.

And according to this cosmos magazine every year the earth has about 6100 meteors reaching this 60 miles area.

Luckily for us, most of them are too tiny, and they just burn up in the atmosphere.

It is really odd that this iss has not been knocked out of the sky over all these years being that they are fully exposed to every meteor before it reaches the burn up space at 60 miles up.

6100 might sound like a lot, until you consider the space around the earth is huge, and there is plenty of room for the ISS and meteors up there. The odds of it being hit are extremely small. It’d be like you trying to hit a fly a mile away with a pistol.

 

[JackRT]

Another interesting observation is that according to science meteors burn up at about 60 miles up. Meaning that the iss is 200 miles higher than the 60 miles up where meteors burn up. And according to this cosmos magazine every year the earth has about 6100 meteors reaching this 60 miles area.

It is really odd that this iss has not been knocked out of the sky over all these years being that they are fully exposed to every meteor before it reaches the burn up space at 60 miles up.

Actually the ISS has been impacted several times by both meteors and orbital space debris. All have been minor. They have also had to change orbit on a couple of occasions to avoid larger objects. Keep in mind that 6100 over the entire area of the earth makes them extremely few and far between. But it is a hazard.

 

[SeventyOne]

Is this the stuff you're talking about?

If so, you might want to find another horse to hitch on. At no point does electric universe say that all impact craters are caused by electric discharge - it only says that SOME of them are, and they make a point of differentiating. Even if this is the explanation you want to use, you still have to explain where meteors are coming from, and now you have the added problem of explaining how the electric universe is compatible with any flat earth model.

Partially, and no I don't have any added problem. The electrical model isn't incompatible with flat earth. It just isn't presented in such a way by this particular group of ballers.

 

[SeventyOne]

Out of curiosity, do you believe that the Barringer Crater was created by a giant lightning bolt that would make Zeus proud?

Crap like this is why I'm constantly hesitant to say anything to a particular subgroup here.

Absolutely clueless and proud of it.

 

[lasthero]

The electrical model isn't incompatible with flat earth.

Okay - in what way is it compatible with the flat earth?