d taylor
Well-Known Member
- Oct 16, 2018
- 10,868
- 4,777
- 59
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Single
Of course you don't. You have no interest in truth or facts when it comes to pushing your narrative.
One photo is from 0.39% more than the earth's radius, the other is from 3.9% more than the earth's radius. That's a difference of 3.5%
The earth is HUGE in comparison to the distances you are bringing up
Well sure, because facts are important
These are a few of the different lenses used for photography aboard the I.S.S. Each one has its own particular field of view. From 25 miles up you can see nearly 450 miles to the horizon, so Felix Baumgartner could see less than half the width of the USA from his vantage point. From 250 miles up you can see 1,430 miles, so from the I.S.S they can comfortably see the entire width of the USA.
I can take a photo of a lion in the zoo from a few feet away with a 35mm camera lens. I can go to South Africa and take a photo of a lion from 150 feet away with a 500mm lens. In both images the lion would appear the same size.
They can not show a real whole photo of America they can not go high enough. They can show you a cgi of America.
Like this where America cover basically one side of a globe.
Video: USA city lights from International Space Station (ISS) at night. ~ #18116214
Or this animation
NASA-NOAA Satellite Reveals New Views of Earth at Night
Why do they have to make composites, because they can not go high enough to photo the whole of land.
Upvote
0