- May 28, 2018
- 13,092
- 5,667
- 68
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Reformed
- Marital Status
- Widowed
I will try to explain what I`m thinking about so simple as possible and here it goes, I don`t know, I always imagened life as a swirling form of energy sort of, bright and swirling in empty space and wanting to have a solid body to walk around in on a planet perhaps, because think about it, how would life form out of nothing on a planet and know how to build a psycical body to move around in, there must have been a will to begin with, where did this will come from to begin with, I think it started with the big bang sort of and life started to evolve in empty space and slowly learning how to build planets and rocks to have something solid to move around on, so big bang theory itself is kinda wrong also beause they say it`s just a explosion of energy, I think the logical explaination is that this life form slowly learned how to spread itself throughout space and how to make stones and planets, think about it, what is really matter? I think matter is energy or this life form in a colder sort of form, this life form cools down when away from the sun and forms then solid matter as we know it and can see around us, so spiritual people are perhaps right also since some of them believe everything is one, all matter would become this life again if warm enough but it keeps vibrating on a certain warmth as long as it gets energy from the sun or this life, if you leave matter all alone and not adding energy to it it would just become hard rock as everything else but it keeps being alive from the warmth of the suns, that`s exactly what I think perhaps, that everything started with life and it slowly learned how to build something of a planet to walk around in, of course all life is different from each other but perhaps the source is all the same or the life, the big bang theory is sort of wrong also then, it didn`t start with an explosion, the explosion was just a way to spread life, what do you guys think about it?
I enjoyed your post. A formal logician, say an apologist or rigid scientist, would find your ramblings to be nonsense, but to those who demand a logical presentation (particularly if it includes empirical evidence), of the existence of the metaphysical, your post, like many other things is an example of what may well be such a thing --of the fact that our minds don't only run in realms of the material, but that the metaphysical has always to some degree been visible to our minds.
And when we see God on that day, it will suddenly become clear all along that his existence has been plainly shown, even in the very mind that seeks to ignore the obvious, in its demand for the empirical.
Thank you. However, I fail to see how that may disprove God.
Last edited:
Upvote
0