Evolution or descent with modification?

[Aman777]

Don't make false claims about others. You have not been willing to learn from your errors. Science does not agree with you. You have some very strange beliefs that you cannot support.

I pretty much ignore you since you simply cannot support your claims.

Looks like you missed my test. Can you explain how recently discovered Scientific discoveries wound up in Genesis? No one else can. I have 10 such agreements with Science which God told us would happen in the last days. Tell us your idea of this one if you can.

Genesis 2:4 shows that the big bang of our cosmos was late on the 3rd Day. We know it was late on the 3rd Day/Age since it was only 180 million years until the first Stars of our cosmos lit up. Genesis 1:16 Each of God's Days/Ages is billions of years long, in man's time. Here's the scientific announcement of this event:

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/.../first-stars-universe-big-bang-edges-space-scie...Feb 28, 2018 - Now, scientists peering back into deep time suggest that the earliest stars didn't turn on until about 180 million years after the big bang,

 

[Subduction Zone]

Looks like you missed my test. Can you explain how recently discovered Scientific discoveries wound up in Genesis? No one else can. I have 10 such agreements with Science which God told us would happen in the last days. Tell us your idea of this one if you can.

Genesis 2:4 shows that the big bang of our cosmos was late on the 3rd Day. We know it was late on the 3rd Day/Age since it was only 180 million years until the first Stars of our cosmos lit up. Genesis 1:16 Each of God's Days/Ages is billions of years long, in man's time. Here's the scientific announcement of this event:

https://news.nationalgeographic.com/.../first-stars-universe-big-bang-edges-space-scie...Feb 28, 2018 - Now, scientists peering back into deep time suggest that the earliest stars didn't turn on until about 180 million years after the big bang,

There are none. All you have is reinterpretation at best.

 

[Aman777]

There are none. All you have is reinterpretation at best.

False, since you cannot tell us HOW ancient men who lived thousands of years ago, knew and correctly wrote what today's Science has just now discovered. Looks to me like you are afraid of God's Truth. Amen?

 

[Subduction Zone]

False, since you cannot tell us HOW ancient men who lived thousands of years ago, knew and correctly wrote what today's Science has just now discovered. Looks to me like you are afraid of God's Truth. Amen?

But they never did such a thing. Once again all you have is reinterpretation at best. In fact it is easy to show how they got quite a bit wrong.

 

[Aman777]

But they never did such a thing. Once again all you have is reinterpretation at best. In fact it is easy to show how they got quite a bit wrong.

Not so, since the problem is with the traditional interpretation. Post one of your ideas of what they got wrong and I will show you the difference. The author is the Holy Spirit and He MUST tell us the Truth or He is not the Spirit of Truth.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Not so, since the problem is with the traditional interpretation. Post one of your ideas of what they got wrong and I will show you the difference. The author is the Holy Spirit and He MUST tell us the Truth or He is not the Spirit of Truth.

Then prove your claims. All I have ever seen you do is to make the error of trying to reinterpret the Bible to fit reality. Reinterpretation after the fact does not help.

 

[Kylie]

Not so, since the problem is with the traditional interpretation. Post one of your ideas of what they got wrong and I will show you the difference. The author is the Holy Spirit and He MUST tell us the Truth or He is not the Spirit of Truth.

The claim, "It's right because it says it's right, and since it is right, it must be right when it says it's right," is a very flimsy argument.

 

[Aman777]

Then prove your claims. All I have ever seen you do is to make the error of trying to reinterpret the Bible to fit reality. Reinterpretation after the fact does not help.

I prove them every day on these boards since NO ONE has ever been able to refute (prove wrong) my views either Scripturally, scientifically, historically, or genetically. I don't reinterpret but instead, I view Genesis through the eyes of a modern man who lives the the LAST DAYS of Earth as we know it with the "increased knowledge" Daniel 12:4 (accumulated over the past 3k years) which makes it possible for today's Humans to finally understand Genesis.

God hid His scientific Truth in Genesis and I have 10 agreements with Science and History which NO one has been able to understand the intelligence Who authored this knowledge, more than 3k years ago, which is beyond the intelligence of today's mankind. The increased knowledge available to modern mankind has finally caught up with God's Truth in Genesis 1 and it's God's irrefutable Truth.

BTW, My thinking is Scientific since, like Darwin, I tell you of what I have discovered, and NO ONE can refute it since it's God's Truth. Amen?

 

[Aman777]

The claim, "It's right because it says it's right, and since it is right, it must be right when it says it's right," is a very flimsy argument.

Hey Kylie, Haven't seen you in a long time. Did they ban you for being nasty? LOL, just kidding.... God bless you

 

[Subduction Zone]

I prove them every day on these boards since NO ONE has ever been able to refute (prove wrong) my views either Scripturally, scientifically, historically, or genetically. I don't reinterpret but instead, I view Genesis through the eyes of a modern man who lives the the LAST DAYS of Earth as we know it with the "increased knowledge" Daniel 12:4 (accumulated over the past 3k years) which makes it possible for today's Humans to finally understand Genesis.

God hid His scientific Truth in Genesis and I have 10 agreements with Science and History which NO one has been able to understand the intelligence Who authored this knowledge, more than 3k years ago, which is beyond the intelligence of today's mankind. The increased knowledge available to modern mankind has finally caught up with God's Truth in Genesis 1 and it's God's irrefutable Truth.

BTW, My thinking is Scientific since, like Darwin, I tell you of what I have discovered, and NO ONE can refute it since it's God's Truth. Amen?

You have never done so. Why post an obviously false claim? And you have the burden of proof backwards when it comes to the sciences. No one has to "prove you wrong" since you have not given any evidence at all that you are correct. The standard in science is that one is wrong if he can't support his claims.

But most of your claims are in the lowest status possible in the sciences. Most of what you claim is "not even wrong". That means that your ideas are almost certainly wrong, and that they are so wrong that there is nothing to be learned from them.

Try to support your ideas properly and then we can discuss them.

 

[Kylie]

Hey Kylie, Haven't seen you in a long time. Did they ban you for being nasty? LOL, just kidding.... God bless you

I've been around. If you really want to know, it's not that hard to do a search to see where I've been posting.

 

[Aman777]

I've been around. If you really want to know, it's not that hard to do a search to see where I've been posting.

Musta been because I was silenced for a month for being nasty. Good to be back.

 

[Kylie]

Musta been because I was silenced for a month for being nasty. Good to be back.

Wait...

You got silenced for a month, and because of that you didn't see me, but your first thought is that you didn't see me because I had been banned?

 

[Aman777]

Wait...

You got silenced for a month, and because of that you didn't see me, but your first thought is that you didn't see me because I had been banned?

I was just playing like our President does by projecting my faults onto another. I once got in trouble for just typing his name for which I was silenced for a while. Just checking to see if the same had happened to you?

 

[Bungle_Bear]

I prove them every day on these boards since NO ONE has ever been able to refute (prove wrong) my views either Scripturally, scientifically, historically, or genetically. I don't reinterpret but instead, I view Genesis through the eyes of a modern man who lives the the LAST DAYS of Earth as we know it with the "increased knowledge" Daniel 12:4 (accumulated over the past 3k years) which makes it possible for today's Humans to finally understand Genesis.

God hid His scientific Truth in Genesis and I have 10 agreements with Science and History which NO one has been able to understand the intelligence Who authored this knowledge, more than 3k years ago, which is beyond the intelligence of today's mankind. The increased knowledge available to modern mankind has finally caught up with God's Truth in Genesis 1 and it's God's irrefutable Truth.

BTW, My thinking is Scientific since, like Darwin, I tell you of what I have discovered, and NO ONE can refute it since it's God's Truth. Amen?

Seriously, that dishonest claim again? You have been shown to be wrong "Scripturally, scientifically, historically, or genetically" almost every time you make a claim. Ignoring those demonstrations does not mean they didn't happen.

 

[Kylie]

I was just playing like our President does by projecting my faults onto another.

Why in the world would anyone ever think that is an appropriate thing to do intentionally?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Seriously, that dishonest claim again? You have been shown to be wrong "Scripturally, scientifically, historically, or genetically" almost every time you make a claim. Ignoring those demonstrations does not mean they didn't happen.

I suppose that if one does not understand the corrections given that one could make that claim. It would not be a correct claim, but a person could be so confused that that person believes it.

 

[Bungle_Bear]

I suppose that if one does not understand the corrections given that one could make that claim. It would not be a correct claim, but a person could be so confused that that person believes it.

He is not that intellectually challenged. He understands most, if not all, of the corrections, but he chooses to ignore them. Denial is a very strong defence mechanism.

 

[Aman777]

Seriously, that dishonest claim again? You have been shown to be wrong "Scripturally, scientifically, historically, or genetically" almost every time you make a claim. Ignoring those demonstrations does not mean they didn't happen.

I don't believe those who CLAIM that my views have been refuted in ANY way. NONE of them has ANY evidence to support their falsehoods OR they would post it. Amen?

 

[Aman777]

Why in the world would anyone ever think that is an appropriate thing to do intentionally?

Lighten up... You'll live longer. Amen?