- Mar 28, 2005
- 21,810
- 10,792
- 76
- Country
- New Zealand
- Faith
- Charismatic
- Marital Status
- Married
I have a question. I have just heard that there is a claim that the massacre in Sri Lanka was revenge for the massacre in Christchurch NZ.
What I don't understand is why the revenge was done against Christian churches and members, when the killer of Muslims in Christchurch was an atheist white supremacist. In fact the Christians in Christchurch and around New Zealand stood in love, sympathy and support for the families of the victims.
Also, I don't understand why the revenge was carried out in Sri Lanka where there no white supremacists were present or targeted at all.
Why do I believe that the Jihadis used the Christchurch massacre of Muslims as an opportunity to kill a few more Christians? I could understand them blowing up a gathering of white supremacists in either England or Australia, but why Sri Lanka if it wasn't just to kill defenceless Christians in a country not even connected to white supremacism?
What I don't understand is why the revenge was done against Christian churches and members, when the killer of Muslims in Christchurch was an atheist white supremacist. In fact the Christians in Christchurch and around New Zealand stood in love, sympathy and support for the families of the victims.
Also, I don't understand why the revenge was carried out in Sri Lanka where there no white supremacists were present or targeted at all.
Why do I believe that the Jihadis used the Christchurch massacre of Muslims as an opportunity to kill a few more Christians? I could understand them blowing up a gathering of white supremacists in either England or Australia, but why Sri Lanka if it wasn't just to kill defenceless Christians in a country not even connected to white supremacism?