The evidence for Evolution.

[AV1611VET]

You were in effect abusing the book by spamming it.

Way to go, dad!

Too much emphasis on the Bible can be detrimental to other faiths!

Isaiah 55:11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.

 

[AV1611VET]

No it isnt.

Well it certainly isn't omniscient.

But your idea of god is.

Let's see yours.

I'll put mine right up in the storefront window.

I'd even put some of them on the courthouse lawn, if losers would let me.

Let's see your idea of God on an anonymous venue -- just as in-depth.

 

[dad]

Now, now, the moderator warned you about your abuse of the Bible. All you did was to make it look as if you that did not understand it.

Do you want to learn why the knowledge that we get from the sciences is deemed to be reliable?

Use is not abuse.

 

[dad]

Once again you were only demonstrating a desperate lack of understanding of the Bible. You were in effect abusing the book by spamming it. It is rather amazing when an atheist has more respect for the Bible than a Christian.

The abuse of God's word is not believing it...or allowing it.

 

[VirOptimus]

Well it certainly isn't omniscient.Let's see yours.

I'll put mine right up in the storefront window.

I'd even put some of them on the courthouse lawn, if losers would let me.

Let's see your idea of God on an anonymous venue -- just as in-depth.

I dont believe in god(s) so that was stupid of you.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Science is myopic.

A claim that you have never supported. All you can do is to demonstrate your own myopia.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The abuse of God's word is not believing it...or allowing it.

Let's just say "the Bible" for now. And no, abuse of the Bible is treating it as a magic talisman. It is allowed. Abuse of it is not.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Way to go, dad!

Too much emphasis on the Bible can be detrimental to other faiths!

Isaiah 55:11 So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.

No, he was abusing it just as you are. Quoting out of context is almost always an abuse. Let's try not to do that.

 

[pitabread]

Science is myopic.

Meaningless bumper sticker slogan.

 

[dad]

Let's just say "the Bible" for now. And no, abuse of the Bible is treating it as a magic talisman. It is allowed. Abuse of it is not.

Let's just see the evidence for evolution.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Let's just see the evidence for evolution.

First you must learn the basics. It should not take long, but I will make any denial of evidence clearly dishonest. Are you ready to learn?

 

[dad]

First you must learn the basics. It should not take long, but I will make any denial of evidence clearly dishonest. Are you ready to learn?

The basics are that there are a set of beliefs used when looking at fossils or DNA or anything else, that are used to construct a world that surpasses the degree and wickedness of doctrines of devils or yesteryear.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The basics are that there are a set of beliefs used when looking at fossils or DNA or anything else, that are used to construct a world that surpasses the degree and wickedness of doctrines of devils or yesteryear.

Dad, you either do not understand the basics of science, or you have been lying. I would like to believe that you do not understand the basics of science. It appears that you are afraid to learn the basics. Why don't you try to learn?

 

[AV1611VET]

I dont believe in god(s) so that was stupid of you.

Where did Humpty Dumpty sit, according to the nursery rhyme?

If you can answer that, can you answer a [fable]?

It's a matter of reading comprehension, isn't it?

 

[AV1611VET]

A claim that you have never supported.

Is science omniscient?

If not, why?

 

[AV1611VET]

Meaningless bumper sticker slogan.

But true, is it not?

 

[Subduction Zone]

Is science omniscient?

If not, why?

This is a poorly asked question since the answer does not support your false beliefs.

The answer is no of course. And poorly asked or dishonest questions need not be answered.

 

[Subduction Zone]

But true, is it not?

Nope.

 

[AV1611VET]

Nope.

You give science too much credit.

I submit that disqualifies you from being a Genesis 1 literalist.

 

[dad]

Dad, you either do not understand the basics of science, or you have been lying. I would like to believe that you do not understand the basics of science. It appears that you are afraid to learn the basics. Why don't you try to learn?

Either you cannot reply or you are wasting our time.