- Nov 21, 2018
- 264
- 181
- 48
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Sure you could say that until you see she's actually in space by seeing her multiple video's she posts on her Twitter page.I know the lighting will be different in space, but the stuffed/inflatable Earth doll, the box on the ceiling above it, and what appears to be leather items sitting on the cockpit don't look right.
I'm not doubting the authenticity of whether or not she's on the station. Just remarking that some objects in the photo don't look right.Sure you could say that until you see she's actually in space by seeing her multiple video's she posts on her Twitter page.
Intl. Space Station on Twitter
Hehe fish eye lens has already been debunked a bunch of different ways. Fisheye lenses does not explain the curved horizon seen in space photos. They can't use that anymore.GoPro with a fisheye lens. Or Photoshop. Always an out.
I know the lighting will be different in space, but the stuffed/inflatable Earth doll, the box on the ceiling above it, and what appears to be leather items sitting on the cockpit don't look right.
But you and I both know that they do... and will keep doing so...Hehe fish eye lens has already been debunked a bunch of different ways. Fisheye lenses does not explain the curved horizon seen in space photos. They can't use that anymore.
Unless you can, with precision, objectively quantify what "don't look right" means, it isn't an observation that has much value.I'm not doubting the authenticity of whether or not she's on the station. Just remarking that some objects in the photo don't look right.
What doesn’t look right about them?
It's hard to verbalize, but I'll give it a try.The leather pieces look a little too flat. The box looks a little too clean (quite a bit like 3D renders from several years ago) and the toy seems to have a different light source than the rest of the items. However, as I said before, I am unfamiliar with the lighting in space, which will be different from the lighting on Earth, and lighting may potentially explain all of this.Unless you can, with precision, objectively quantify what "don't look right" means, it isn't an observation that has much value.
It's hard to verbalize, but I'll give it a try.The leather pieces look a little too flat. The box looks a little too clean (quite a bit like 3D renders from several years ago) and the toy seems to have a different light source than the rest of the items. However, as I said before, I am unfamiliar with the lighting in space, which will be different from the lighting on Earth, and lighting may potentially explain all of this.
Yes, the Earth is a diffuse light source, I'm wondering where the moon is as it will be another one. I'm not seeing what directly appears to be solar light since I'm not seeing hard shadows.It would appear that there is no internal illumination to speak of --- it earthlight and as such is very diffuse so that there are no visible shadows.
Those seem to be subjective evaluations. I see definite topography on the leather item; the box looks normal and we know nothing about the lighting sources. I appreciate your effort, but I don't think either of our mutually opposed subjective perceptions mean anything.It's hard to verbalize, but I'll give it a try.The leather pieces look a little too flat. The box looks a little too clean (quite a bit like 3D renders from several years ago) and the toy seems to have a different light source than the rest of the items. However, as I said before, I am unfamiliar with the lighting in space, which will be different from the lighting on Earth, and lighting may potentially explain all of this.
It's hard to verbalize, but I'll give it a try.The leather pieces look a little too flat. The box looks a little too clean (quite a bit like 3D renders from several years ago) and the toy seems to have a different light source than the rest of the items. However, as I said before, I am unfamiliar with the lighting in space, which will be different from the lighting on Earth, and lighting may potentially explain all of this.
You're right, the stuffed/inflatable Earth doll isn't right - the Earth doesn't have arms (ears?) and legs. That's 'Little Earth', a toy that was sent up in the Crew Dragon capsule along with astronaut test dummy 'Ripley'. The leather pieces are probably attached to the panels with Velcro.I know the lighting will be different in space, but the stuffed/inflatable Earth doll, the box on the ceiling above it, and what appears to be leather items sitting on the cockpit don't look right.
Unless you have specialized knowledge of that exact leather piece and/or numerous pictures of that exact leather piece being more rotund, I have no idea how you can make this observation. I have several leather pouches, when they are empty, they are flat, when there is stuff in them, they have more shape. If I take a picture of it at the right angle, it will look super flat when empty...It's hard to verbalize, but I'll give it a try.The leather pieces look a little too flat..
I would ask you why you would think the box would be dirty? It is a common practice in highly technical fields and/or situations to maintain a high level of cleanliness.The box looks a little too clean (quite a bit like 3D renders from several years ago)
I have no idea how you get that at all? The toy is the only thing of that color / texture in the photo so of course its lighting may look a little different than say the black panel it is in front of. The only way you could make this claim is if there were other comparable objects with bright colors and comparable textures in the photo with the toy. Similarly, the angle of the other objects would need to be similar and then and only then would you be able to make a lighting comparison.and the toy seems to have a different light source than the rest of the items.
Lighting is lighting. There are diffuse light sources on earth, you can have colored lighting, etc.However, as I said before, I am unfamiliar with the lighting in space, which will be different from the lighting on Earth, and lighting may potentially explain all of this.
Must be fake?
Astronaut Anne McClain shares her view from the ISS.
Anne McClain on Twitter
View attachment 252361
Anne says hi to all the flat Earthers