essentialsaltes
Stranger in a Strange Land
- Oct 17, 2011
- 33,316
- 36,634
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
Sorry, that old fable doesn't cut the mustard. The sites all are claimed to have been dunked miles under the ground and then resurfaced eons later. You can start by proving this, and we'll look at the other bits of the fable if you succeed. Too bad you won't be able to though.
To your satisfaction? Perhaps not. But you asked a question, and I gave you a great answer.
The present character of (anything in physics) has nothing to do with what physics or forces or laws were like before this nature!
How is it you know this?
The only way you could enter that as evidence is if you first proved nature was the same. Instead you offer it as some absurd attempt at circular reasoning where it is supposed to prove the nature of the past.
As I pointed out, we see the same effect. The same result in the ratio of daughter nuclei. This gives us confidence that the cause is also the same.
You assert that natural causes were different. What is your evidence?
Upvote
0