- Nov 21, 2008
- 53,064
- 11,767
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
Incorrect. I do not know you personally. I am sure that you are very nice person.
I simply do not like the false teaching that have corrupted your understanding.
still it would be nice to see you read a Bible text on the topic of this thread - for example Daniel 7 and show that your ideas actually are supported in the Bible no matter how many times you can accuse someone of having "corrupt understanding"
I have in fact responded to your comments of Daniel 7 and I will repeat again for you.
There is NO INVESTIGATIVE JUDGMENT in Daniel y.
I have seen your by-faith-alone - statement that ignores every bible fact highlighted on page one of this thread -- I was hoping you would post a Bible fact in support of your speculation.
That is strictly an Ellen G. WHite false doctrine which was once given by Mr. Miller.
That is total nonsense.
1. Page 1 of this thread appeals to no statement from either of those two persons. And we all know it.
2. Miller never claimed any understanding at all about the "Investigative Judgment".
More facts - less creative writing please.
You appear to enjoy "posting your preferences" - which you have the right to do .. but in a debate forum - posting actual Bible fact has the high value and high usefulness. Simply posting speculation and preference is not as useful to others.
Then just use the "IGNORE" option and we will both be happy.
I appreciate your willingness to be so transparent for all of us to see.
Tell you what.…...YOU post ONE Scripture from Daniel 7 that you believe validates your Investigative Judgment and I will be blessed to correctly explain that verses meaning to you.
I have posted a great many of them from Daniel 7 on page one of this thread
Feel free to select one that you believe to be in need of correction. That is how it normally works on these threads.
NO sir. It is you that needs to post the Scriptures that YOU need explained.
??? In find your logic "illusive" at that point.
I am asking you to post in the normal fashion for this debate forum. Is that not clear?
I am the saying that there is NO Investigative Judgment.
True you are. Ignoring every text in the OP and page 1 of this thread - you continue to simply repeat that speculation.
It is then up to YOU to prove YOUR theology.
Which I already did non page 1.
How is this not clear??
You are supposed to respond to the Daniel 7 texts given as proof of the details already laid out on "page 1" - and tell us where you differ.
But ya know what, I am a nice guy so I will help out.
Daniel 7:1...……
"In the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon, Daniel had a dream, and visions passed through his mind as he was lying in bed. He wrote down the substance of his dream.'
The time of Daniels vision is explained historically.
It was in the 1st year of the rule of Belshazzar.
Thanks for that - is this helping your case?
That means it was in the end of the time that the HEAD of GOLD or Babylon was ruling the world.
the first year of Belshazzar king of Babylon -- occurs before the Persian empire destroys Babylon. I think we all knew that.
He was king from 550 B.C. to 539 B.C.
Now as you can plainly see, there is NO Investigation Judgment of Christians in that ONE verse.
There is no claim on Page 1 of this thread that there was an investigative judgment in heaven during the time of Babylon or Persia, or Greece or ....
Please allow your statements to be informed by the texts quoted on page one of this thread.
Upvote
0