You are probably well used to being called racist, why? Maybe because you are preaching anti-jewish conspiracy theories all over the place?
Stuff Hitler used to do.
Holocaust? Bad thing? WWI & WWIi? Bad things.
Hitler's attempt to revive the "Holy" Roman Empire failed. He was called the "German Messiah" and claimed their Regime (reich) would last a 1000 years - right out of Revelation. Lies that appealed to the German people because Germany was the seat of the "Holy" "Roman" Empire from 800 to 1806.
Part of that fanaticism was to blame it all on the Jews, and urge genocide, claiming it was good.
Which is what you are doing. Yet, Israel is a minor state, and Jews are hardly a blip in world influence.
Claiming them as the "mother of abominations" is absurd. They have been on the run for the past two thousand years, and are a tiny race. They have hardly made any impact.
The beast is already being worshipped.
The beast has been around a long time.
One of the heads died, but came as if back to life.
That is what is new about the beast. That is why it is being worshipped around the world, today.
That, and the False Prophet, who causes the world to worship the Beast.
They are astonished because one of the seven heads is as resurrected , and worship the beast, saying, 'who is like the beast, who can make war with the beast?'
The beast's seven heads are seven nations.
Nothing to do with Jews or Israel.
Obviously. Israel is not a world leading Kingdom, as the statue of Daniel states it would be. Iron (rome, identified as) mixed with clay.
Hrm, the empire had to follow Rome... as global ruling empire... was that... Israel? No. Nope, Israel is not a global ruling empire.
Does not fit at all, then. Sadly, for you, I suppose your weirs hatred of Jews simply is not backed up by God.
Hitler tried, and failed. Not happening again.
God didn't destroy their nation, send them wandering among wolves for two thousand years, allow them to do the Holocaust... fulfill Zechariah verses about returning... just to destroy them, again.
Not like God. That is difficult to fathom sadism and cruelty. Bizarre. Like, "what if some virulent, internet random neo-nazi's view of God" was real.
Well, it isn't. If God supported the Nazis, he wouldn't have allowed them to be defeated in such a humiliating way. God has made anti-semitism a shame, globally.
harlot of Babylon - Wikipedia
Rome and the Roman EmpireEdit
See also:
Dea Roma
Many Biblical scholars
[7][8] believe that "Babylon" is a metaphor for the pagan
Roman Empire at the time it persecuted Christians, before the
Edict of Milan in 313: perhaps specifically referencing some aspect of Rome's rule (brutality, greed,
paganism). Some
exegetes interpret the passage as a scathing critique of a servant people of Rome who do the Empire's bidding, interpreting that the author of Revelation was speaking of the
Herodians—a party of Jews friendly to Rome and open to its influence, like the
Hellenizersof centuries past—and later, corrupt
Hasmoneans, where the
ruler of Jerusalem or
Roman Judeaexercised his power at the pleasure of the Emperor, and was dependent on Roman influence, like
Herod the Great in the
Gospel of Luke.
In
4 Ezra,
[9][10] 2 Baruch[11] and the
Sibylline Oracles,
[12] "Babylon" is a
cryptic name for Rome.
[13]Reinhard Feldmeier speculates that "Babylon" is used to refer to Rome in
1 Peter 5:13.
[14] In Revelation 17:9 it is said that she sits on "seven mountains",
[15]typically understood as the
seven hills of Rome.
[16][17][18][19][20] A Roman coin minted under the Emperor
Vespasian (ca. 70 AD) depicts
Rome as a woman sitting on seven hills.
[21]
According to the
International Standard Bible Encyclopedia, "The characteristics ascribed to this Babylon apply to Rome rather than to any other city of that age: (a) as ruling over the kings of the earth (Revelation 17:18); (b) as sitting on seven mountains (Revelation 17:9); (c) as the center of the world's merchandise (Revelation 18:3, 11–13); (d) as the corrupter of the nations (Revelation 17:2; 18:3; 19:2); (e) as the persecutor of the saints (Revelation 17:6)."
[22]
According to
Eusebius of Caesarea Babylon would be Rome or the Roman Empire:
"And Peter makes mention of Mark in his first epistle which they say that he wrote in Rome itself, as is indicated by him, when he calls the city, by a figure, Babylon, as he does in the following words: «The church that is at Babylon, elected together with you, salutes you; and so does Marcus my son.»(1 Peter 5:13)"
[23]
