The flesh and blood he commands us to eat is that which is that which is exulted at the right hand of the Father. He is the Life giving spirit (1 Corinthians 15:44-46), and we are to partake of Him. So HIS resurrected and glorified spiritual body "is food indeed" and His blood "is drink indeed" (John 6:55). It is His "spiritual" body and blood, that "quickeneth." When His resurrected body ascended into heaven, gone to be with the Father, it trumps time, so that when He offered it to His disciples at the last supper it really is His body and blood, even then. The created time table does not restrict the power of Christ's glorified humanity.
I just can't understand. How is it that you have the Scriptures right in front of you and yet you can't see what's as clear as can be? Where is all this "spiritual discernment" of yours that you have suggested that I'm lacking in?
You are confused
while i believe that all the saints of all time eat the same "spiritual meat" and drink the same "spiritual drink" ( 1 Cor 10:3,4). This is not what the Eastern Orthodox and Roman Catholics do. They say the literal bread and cup becomes the literal flesh and blood of jesus.
You try to twist your way out of it in a bizzar way without scripture. When Jesus took the "bread" and the "cup" or the fruit of the vine. It in no way changed its substance to be his literal flesh and blood. It was a figure, just as all the other types and shadows were in the law. The lamb slain for sin was a figure of Jesus death on the cross. When John the baptist said to behold the Lamb of God as he pointed to jesus. He did not mean jesus was a literal lamb.
Spiritual language is hidden from some.
You try to make up some fiction about this statement you made
"When His resurrected body ascended into heaven, gone to be with the Father, it trumps time, so that when He offered it to His disciples at the last supper it really is His body and blood, even then"
no scripture for this
I believe they eat his flesh and blood by coming to him and believing on him in their hearts. The word is food and faith in His blood is drink. But this is a long talk and a spiritual reality to believers.
However, we are to flee from idolatry. To bow down to and worship anything that is not God is idolatry.
Paul simply says "this bread which we break". He does not say it transubstantiates and becomes literally Jesus body and the cup literally becomes the blood. The supper is done in
remembrance of Jesus body and blood.
I also showed you verses in Hebrews that exposed the error many teach in the Eastern orthodox church and the Roman catholic church how that the testament is only in affect at the death of the tester. Jesus hadn't died yet. So the new testament was not in effect.
Yes, God can have men be born again inwardly by His word through repentance and faith in the old and new testaments. But all this inward new birth came through the work of Jesus in time. We know this verse, "thy word was found and I did eat". Jesus said the words that he spoke, they are spirit and they are life.
Either way, the bread is still bread and the fruit of the vine is still the fruit of the vine.
If you think the bread becomes God, the flesh of Jesus literally. The scripture says we don't know Christ after the flesh anymore Paul said that (2 Cor 5:16 KJV).
Also, here’s a proof, take a piece of your bread and another unconsecrated piece, leave them in the wilderness for 2 months and see if your bread and the other bread both corrupt. God will not suffer His holy one to see corruption.
There are so many things to say that can disprove your doctrine, but it goes into a whole different area.