A PLAN TO DESTROY AMERICA ... and beyond

[brinny]

...oh the irony of Trump supporters warning of us of the dangers of absolute power.

Nice dodge.

 

[Belk]

No, I'm just messing with you. I will have to do some in depth research into the recent history of ever single country on that list of yours to determine if in fact these countries do not have a primary language ... it will take some time ... I'll get back to you ... maybe next year sometime.

Or you could just look at Canada. It's been bi-lingual since its inception with no issues.

 

[Belk]

I don't. Our country was built as a melting pot, not
multi-cultural nonsense. If they don't want to be an
American, they need to leave, or not come here in
the first place.

They want to be an American hence why they emigrated. That you do not like their subsequent choices does not change their freedom to make them.

 

[cow451]

These men you mention were not "hungry" for power, nor greedy. EACH of them had a "heart" for the people (well, except King Solomon, who tragically succumbed to pagan gods, building them for his many wives).

I was speaking throughout history, with the evidences of "absolute power" right there, of how corrupt that absolute power can be, and the absolute evil that ensues, along with that absolute power.

Harvey Weinstein had a form of it. And as Meryl Streep said, to her and to soooo many others, he was "god", and they'd do anything for him, even cover up and deflect from his absolute depravity, and fight for political candidates who also support and cover up for Harvey Weinstein, and attack anyone who dared to upset that apple cart, and call millions of people "deplorables" for DARING to support a candidate who threatens to upset that apple cart.

Ironic, eh?

Didn’t David have a little hunger for Uriah’s sweetheart?

 

[cow451]

Nice dodge.

Massa Trump been good to da workin’ folk. He say gonna get us more mining jobs like good old days. Bring back company store.

 

[brinny]

Didn’t David have a little hunger for Uriah’s sweetheart?

Sure did. It was Uriah's wife, by the way. What he did to Uriah and Bathsheba was abominable.

You know the rest of the story, right?

 

[cow451]

No, no, you are confusing that date with the sign in the heavens in Rev. 12:1 -- the sign occurred. A sign given (if it is a legitimate prophetic sign) does not necessitate that something would happen on that day. Why would God warn people without giving them a little time to think things over, prepare. This sign may warn us that something is coming not just in our generation but within months ... otherwise after a year or so, the likelihood of it being real diffuses. Fyi, I'm not so sure about Planet X existing though, I am that God does.

Remember 1 Thessalonians 5:2. Planet X did indeed strike the Earth and destroyed it (actually absorbed it). The MSM and NASA are keeping it covered up. In the near future, the Planet X and Plant Earth merger will be announced and be rebranded as Planet Trump. You have been warned.

 

[cow451]

Sure did. It was Uriah's wife, by the way. What he did to Uriah and Bathsheba was abominable.

You know the rest of the story, right?

Who says crime never pays. Roy Moore is modern King David.

 

[brinny]

Massa Trump been good to da workin’ folk. He say gonna get us more mining jobs like good old days. Bring back company store.

LOL!

 

[brinny]

Who says crime never pays. Roy Moore is modern King David.

Awwww i was thinkin' it was more like ummmmmmm....

Harvey Weinstein.

Maryl Streep called him "God".

 

[Mountainmanbob]

You lost me will all the pronouns without antecedents. Try again without all the "they"s and "them"s?

Sorry you did not receive the message sent.

Mountain code.

M-Bob

 

[Mountainmanbob]

Or you could just look at Canada. It's been bi-lingual since its inception with no issues.

Okay naturally Canada's forefathers were in agreement with that but, in America our forefathers would not have been.

Of course many do not care regarding our Founders anymore.

M-Bob

 

[bhsmte]

...oh the irony of Trump supporters warning of us of the dangers of absolute power.

And, i am still waiting to hear, who in the US, has absolute power in politics.

 

[Belk]

Okay naturally Canada's forefathers were in agreement with that but, in America our forefathers would not have been.

I do not find you a credible spokesperson for the founding fathers.

Of course many do not care regarding our Founders anymore.

M-Bob

What does this have to do with point 1 of the OP being incorrect? Multilingual societies function just fine and in no way can be seen as a sign of someone attempting to "destroy the country".

 

[ThatRobGuy]

QUESTIONS:
Does anyone disagree that this is happening in the U.S. and why?

No, multilingualism isn't synonymous with a push of autonomy...the person who made this speech carefully cherry picked the examples that suited the narrative they were trying to further.

There are actually more instances of pushes for autonomy from areas where language isn't even a factor.
(Texas, for example...the people pushing for Texas to become its own nation weren't the Spanish speakers living in Texas, it was the English-speaking conservatives)

Can we honestly identify this as a socialist movement?

No, none of this has anything to do with Socialism. The speaker in this case has made the same mistake as almost every other conspiracy theorist I've heard (Alex Jones, David Icke, Jim Marrs), in that they try to equate every single effort to help the less fortunate or promote middle-out economics as "Socialism" which...to the best of my knowledge, those things don't have anything to do with social ownership over the means of production so therefore, they're misusing the term the same way most other people do.

Finally, is this the plan of the U.N. to gradually remove each countries sovereignty, redistribute wealth and eventually create a "Utopian" One World Government with the idea that then and only then can we have world peace, solve world hunger, where everyone has the same and we all get along and live happily ever after?

No, although, I'm not surprised that was the end conclusion of this speaker, for the guys I listed above, it almost always circles back around to the NWO theories (and not the cool NWO of Hogan, Hall, and Nash lol), but the theory that "the Illuminati" secretly wants to create a one-world government.


This speaker has pretty much used divisive rhetoric that basically tip-toes the line of nationalism and racism.

When these guys are talking about the issue of "it's wrong to celebrate diversity over unity", there are some critical flaws with their presentation of these two ideas:
1) They present them as mutually exclusive concepts when, in fact, you can celebrate both.
2) They present "other cultures" as an inherent enemy.
3) The "Unity" they speak of only ever seems to include 100% acceptance of their ideas...anything outside of their ideological box gets put in their "diversity" column which, as noted before, they portray as the enemy.


I took the liberty of looking into a few of his books, and it appears that he caught some flak (even from his own party) for a few of his essays as they read somewhat like a quasi-racist manifesto.

 

[ThatRobGuy]

Of course many do not care regarding our Founders anymore.

There's no doubt that they had some good ideas, however, those ideas were put into a document that our courts still adhere to. So in that regard, they get all of the reverence they should from the American people.

In terms of this quasi-worship that some people seem to expect for them, that I don't get... (other than just the blatantly obvious reason which is because people just want to use that as justification for their uber-conservative stances on certain aspects of government)

I wouldn't want to be treated by a 1700's doctor instead of a current one if I were having a major medical emergency, would you? So why would you expect someone else from that era to have all of the answers than someone from the present time.

Like I said, there's no doubt they did have some good ideas...however, to say that a person from that long ago is somehow the beacon of wisdom for any and all societal scenarios is just plain shortsighted. There's no reason to worship them, and there's no reason to think that they were inherently smarter than everyone in present day America.

 

[Aryeh Jay]

I wouldn't want to be treated by a 1700's doctor instead of a current one if I were having a major medical emergency, would you? So why would you expect someone else from that era to have all of the answers than someone from the present time.

No way man! Modern medicine is science and science is the devil. I am perfectly happy with Dr. Rushes Blue pills, a good bleeding, leaches, and tonics with lots of kerosene and laudanum.

 

[brinny]

No way man! Modern medicine is science and science is the devil. I am perfectly happy with Dr. Rushes Blue pills, a good bleeding, leaches, and tonics with lots of kerosene and laudanum.

LOL!

Nice rant.

 

[Mountainmanbob]

to say that a person from that long ago is somehow the beacon of wisdom for any and all societal scenarios is just plain shortsighted. There's no reason to worship them, and there's no reason to think that they were inherently smarter than everyone in present day America.

Also, no reason not to think that they had their wits about them. Actually, don't see a lot of that these days.

As man gets puffed up in himself and thinks, yes I'm just a little smarter than those ones.

M-Bob

 

[Aryeh Jay]

LOL!

Nice rant.

Laudanum, it’ll fix what ails ya.