A PLAN TO DESTROY AMERICA ... and beyond

[brinny]

The operative word is “If”

There is no "if" in absolute power.

 

[cow451]

There is no "if" in absolute power.

Try to keep up. If ignorance is strength, Donald Trump is Mr. Universe.

 

[Desk trauma]

A PLAN TO DESTROY AMERICA ... and beyond

Why absolute power is dangerous (and always HAS been):

"Ignorance is strength"

Remind me again, who has absolute power in the US?

 

[brinny]

Try to keep up. I was responding to the posted quote by Brinny. If ignorance is strength, Donald Trump is Mr. Universe.

Awwwww nice try, but the OP is about absolute power.

Isn't it?

 

[brinny]

Remind me again, who has absolute power in the US?

LOL!

Ummmmm that's not what the OP is about....

 

[Desk trauma]

Awwwww nice try, but the OP is about absolute power.

Isn't it?

The OP is about baseless paranoia.

 

[Desk trauma]

LOL!

Ummmmm that's not what the OP is about....

Wait, between post 104 and 105 the subject of the OP changed?

 

[brinny]

The OP is about baseless paranoia.

Your opinion is noted.

Thank you for sharing it.

 

[brinny]

Wait, between post 104 and 105 the subject of the OP changed?

LOL!

 

[bhsmte]

Remind me again, who has absolute power in the US?

You wont get an answer, even though the poster in question posted some pretty pictures about the same.

You see, answering a question on a topic they brought up, risks exposure and that must be avoided.

 

[bhsmte]

Your opinion is noted.


Thank you for sharing it.

Your refusal to answer a simple question on a topic you brought up, is noted.

Thanks for evading.

 

[brinny]

You wont get an answer, even though the poster in question posted some pretty pictures about the same.

You see, answering a question on a topic they brought up, risks exposure and that must be avoided.

LOL!

You talkin' 'bout me?

i'm flattered.

i realize i'm intriguing, but wow this is bringing it to a whole new level....

like ummmmm....

obsession?

 

[bhsmte]

LOL!

You talkin' 'bout me?

i'm flattered.

i realize i'm intriguing, but wow this is bringing it to a whole new level....

like ummmmm....

obsession?

LOL

 

[brinny]

Your refusal to answer a simple question on a topic you brought up, is noted.

Thanks for evading.

LOL!

Thanks for following me.

i really SHOULD start that fan club.

 

[brinny]

LOL

i KNOW, right?

 

[bhsmte]

LOL!

Thanks for following me.

i really SHOULD start that fan club.

Thanks for the entertainment.

 

[brinny]

Thanks for the entertainment.

ROFLOLOLOLOL!!!!!

Awwwww i'm sooooo flattered.

Thank you.

I'm delightful, aren't i?

 

[Desk trauma]

ROFLOLOLOLOL!!!!!

Awwwww i'm sooooo flattered.

Thank you.

I'm delightful, aren't i?

...for all the wrong reasons.

 

[Ronald]

No, multilingualism isn't synonymous with a push of autonomy...the person who made this speech carefully cherry picked the examples that suited the narrative they were trying to further.

Who said it was, Multilingualism by itself can't do much. Most of the responses are arguing against this one out of eight points. No one seems to be interested in the other points. But this could not push for autonomy until the sovereignty of a nation is relinquished or destroyed. Then a utopian one-world government can come in and pick up the pieces as they collectively do the same with others who willingly cooperate or not.

No, none of this has anything to do with Socialism. The speaker in this case has made the same mistake as almost every other conspiracy theorist I've heard (Alex Jones, David Icke, Jim Marrs), in that they try to equate every single effort to help the less fortunate or promote middle-out economics as "Socialism" which...to the best of my knowledge, those things don't have anything to do with social ownership over the means of production so therefore, they're misusing the term the same way most other people do.

Denial

This speaker has pretty much used divisive rhetoric that basically tip-toes the line of nationalism and racism.

When these guys are talking about the issue of "it's wrong to celebrate diversity over unity", there are some critical flaws with their presentation of these two ideas:
1) They present them as mutually exclusive concepts when, in fact, you can celebrate both.
2) They present "other cultures" as an inherent enemy.
3) The "Unity" they speak of only ever seems to include 100% acceptance of their ideas...anything outside of their ideological box gets put in their "diversity" column which, as noted before, they portray as the enemy.

He wasn't taking sides, He gave you a choice at the end of the speech.
1. You can celebrate both if you both cooperate with each other -- but that is what we do not see today. They have to assimilate and recognize our ways and language. We do not further divide our nation into fragments of separate cultures insisting we implement their ways into ours. For instance, Sharia Law cannot be part of our Judicial System, yet they will push for that. Obama elected the first Muslim Judge - oh boy -- Ben Carson had it right.
2 & 3. No, no enemies. Just know that America, our flag, our Constitution, our laws come first - we unite under these pillars, our history -- not theirs!!!
Once they come over legally and learn our laws, language and ways, then they can keep their cultural values or religions -- just do not push them on us. They need to assimilate to our country and ways, not the other way around.

 

[brinny]

...for all the wrong reasons.

LOL!

Awwww it's ok.....i understand