Christians owning guns specifically for self defense? (Biblical references, insight?)

Status
Not open for further replies.

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,814
2,508
63
Ohio
✟122,293.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
This thread is about should Christians carry guns not about the research you did on Matt. 22:40.

I take your post #230 to be combative and I won’t be drawn into it. When a post reads:



In my opinion Jesus is about love not violence be it justified violence or not, and I am not going argue with you about that.
I said nothing different but you challenged what I said about Love and accused me of believing man's teachings when I take the teaching straight out of scripture and invited you to discuss it with me. To which you accused me of be combative....lol...asking for discussion is not combative...not to mention that as you said, it's about Love thus a discussion about Love and how the OT law informs the NT law of Love is very much so on topic..but you don't want to discuss that because? I don't know why? Because you are afraid? Because you don't like discussion? Because you want to inflate what I said into something it isn't? I don't know there aren't a lot of reasons why someone would issue a challenge that is on topic then refuse to discuss it so that we could come to an agreement as per what scripture says....btw, your not the only one on this thread that refuses to discuss what scripture is telling us about the topic. It's interesting you took it personally.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
funny but not helpful...in fact, you don't know me or what I believe to have a problem with me and yet you do which says a lot...

I do not know what you believe?

What you say is what you believe.
 
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,814
2,508
63
Ohio
✟122,293.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I do not know what you believe?

What you say is what you believe.
lol you have read into everything I have said what is not there, accused me of saying things I didn't say, and then told me I believe things that I not only didn't say but are offensive to what I believe. Doesn't sound to me like you have a clue what I believe....don't believe me? I challenge you to tell me what I believe about this topic...if you get it right I formally apologize, if you get it wrong, you formally apologize to me...
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
In my opinion Jesus is about love not violence be it justified violence or not, and I am not going argue with you about that.

God is love. And, yet God out of love will do the following when the right time comes...

This is yet to come.

"Still another angel, who had charge of the fire, came from the altar
and called in a loud voice to him who had the sharp sickle, “Take your
sharp sickle and gather the clusters of grapes from the earth’s vine,
because its grapes are ripe.” "The angel swung his sickle on the earth,
gathered its grapes and threw them into the great winepress of God’s
wrath. " They were trampled in the winepress outside the city,
and blood flowed out of the press, rising as high as the horses’ bridles
for a distance of 1,600 stadia." Rev 14:18-20

1600 stadia equals about 184 miles. That is human blood being spoken of.

Love hates evil... if its really love, it will.
 
Upvote 0

Rion

Annuit Cœptis
Site Supporter
Oct 26, 2006
21,868
6,275
Nebraska
✟419,198.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
...the one and only time a follower of Jesus uses a sword in the New Testament Jesus rebuked the guy using it and healed the person he struck. I think if you want to use the Bible to support us owning a weapon then we'd have to follow Jesus example and do like He did. I'd also ask: where did Jesus ever mention His followers owning guns in the Bible? :scratch:
tulc(would be interested in that last bit most of all) :wave:

Jesus never mentioned vaccinations in the Bible. Am I to assume that you're an anti-vaxxer? He never mentioned bicycles or cars either; I suppose you walk everywhere? He also never mentions coffee either. Guess you'll have to cut that out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: razzelflabben
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
lol you have read into everything I have said what is not there, accused me of saying things I didn't say, and then told me I believe things that I not only didn't say but are offensive to what I believe. Doesn't sound to me like you have a clue what I believe....don't believe me? I challenge you to tell me what I believe about this topic...if you get it right I formally apologize, if you get it wrong, you formally apologize to me...



I was too busy working with your misconceptions that allowed to to conclude what you want to believe. What you really believe is your business. What I wanted to do was to clarify a few things that did not back up what you believe. After those are clarified? And, you still find its ok to believe what you do? Fine. But, I do not want to allow sloppy thinking to be the means to drawing the conclusions you have, be they the right thing or not. That's the point I have been targeting. You may have a right conclusion. But you are coming to it in a wrong way. You need to first know what certain passages mean, not what common knowledge accepts erroneously, and then draws conclusions from them.
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
...the one and only time a follower of Jesus uses a sword in the New Testament Jesus rebuked the guy using it and healed the person he struck. I think if you want to use the Bible to support us owning a weapon then we'd have to follow Jesus example and do like He did. I'd also ask: where did Jesus ever mention His followers owning guns in the Bible? :scratch:
tulc(would be interested in that last bit most of all) :wave:

He also told Peter to keep the sword. He rebuked Peter for acting like a criminal, not for having a sword. What Peter did would be like you shooting a police officer who was knocking on your door to issue an arrest of a family member. So many miss that point. Peter was acting like a criminal. "Those who live by the sword"... spoke of the lifestyle of a criminal.

It would be like today someone telling a ghetto kid in Chicago... "Those who live by the gun, will die by the gun." Jesus was not condemning carrying a sword in itself. It was its misuse that he condemned in Peter.
 
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,814
2,508
63
Ohio
✟122,293.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I was too busy working with your misconceptions that allowed to to conclude what you want to believe. What you really believe is your business. What I wanted to do was to clarify a few things that did not back up what you believe. After those are clarified? And, you still find its ok to believe what you do? Fine. But, I do not want to allow sloppy thinking to be the means to drawing the conclusions you have, be they the right thing or not. That's the point I have been targeting. You may have a right conclusion. But you are coming to it in a wrong way. You need to first know what certain passages mean, not what common knowledge accepts erroneously, and then draws conclusions from them.
lol....please do tell since you have yet to address one single misconception I have...I'm willing to be taught but you have to at least resemble something that is on target. And just for the record...what do you think I believe that is wrong....you can't even answer that question cause you don't know you just want to argue with me...at least that is what your posts tell me.
 
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,814
2,508
63
Ohio
✟122,293.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Let's make this even easier for you shall we? The above passage about taking a sword...specifically Peter what do I believe about this passage that you find so wrong? Please be specific since I have not said anything at all about the passage in question.
 
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,932
768
62
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟308,557.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You want to be? They were all castrated, like other such captives under the king. They were captives of WAR.

That's irrelevant. The point is that when their lives were on the line they relied on God.

When a criminal threatens you with bodily harm? You are not a captive of war. Matter of fact, being a captive of war is when Jesus says we should turn the other cheek. For he was speaking of the harsh treatment Jews were receiving under the Roman occupation of Israel.

How exactly do you know what Jesus was speaking of? It's funny that you say what He meant as if you were there and He told you. Or maybe you're imposing your theology on His words. The bottom line is that the historical evidence shows that your understanding of His words is incorrect.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,932
768
62
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟308,557.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But? Jesus was using a fully accepted real life situation to illustrate with. You keep failing to see that point. Jesus would not use some illegitimate practice to justify his position concerning what he wished to describe using an analogy.

How do you know what Jesus would do? Your statement shows that you're imposing your thoughts on His words. Yes, He used an analogy that would likely be seen in the real world. That doesn't mean He was telling His disciples to do it. People use real world scenarios often that they themselves would never do.
 
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,932
768
62
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟308,557.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
"Whenever the strong man having fully-armed-himself is guarding his own
courtyard, his possessions are in peace. " Lk 11:21

When he changed to a stronger other person taking that man's goods? He spoke of himself. No one is stronger than the Lord.


Why do you work to buy food? Why not depend upon the Lord to put it on your doorstep every morning? After all? He created food. (that's the kind of reasoning you give me)

You miss the point. It's not about self defense. It's about demons. Why do I work? Because the Scriptures tell me I should work. Paul said if a man won't work he shouldn't eat. The reason not use violence is because Christ said to love your enemies. It's a straight forward command.
 
Upvote 0

Butch5

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 7, 2012
8,932
768
62
Homer Georgia
Visit site
✟308,557.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You are ignoring this.....


The world would be enslaved now if too many people thought like you do.

graves_at_normandy-P.jpeg


The Normandy American Cemetery, overlooking Omaha Beach and the English Channel, was established on June 8, 1944, as the first U.S. cemetery in Europe during World War II. It holds the graves of more than 9,300 U.S. servicemen who died in the D-Day invasion or subsequent missions.


soldiers_in_normandy_cemetery.jpg

Two American World War II veterans pay their respects to their fallen brethren. Approximately 1 million visitors travel to the Normandy cemetery each year.


Again, I'm not ignoring anything. You think the world would be enslaved if people thought like me? Don't you trust God to oversee His creation? Your statement really makes me wonder. Why do you think that men can better care for the world than God can?
 
Upvote 0

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That's irrelevant. The point is that when their lives were on the line they relied on God.

The reason they were in the mess they were in was because God was punishing Israel for not relying on Him.

Think a second here, please. The Lord parted the waters and Israel passed through unharmed. Right? They watched the power of the Lord destroy the powerful Egyptian army that had been pursuing them, Right? They knew the power of God to protect? Without a doubt.

But, what was one of the very first things God commanded of Israel soon after? A draft! The Book of Numbers was about drafting an army that God wanted Israel to form.

Can you still think that just because God performs miracles (to reassure us He is real)? That He will use that same modus operandi for all our conflicts? The Bible does not teach that.

Just ask David why he took five stones for his sling, and why he didn't simply trust God and pray Goliath into death. He trusted God to give him the strength to kill the giant.


You miss the point. It's not about self defense. It's about demons. Why do I work? Because the Scriptures tell me I should work. Paul said if a man won't work he shouldn't eat. The reason not use violence is because Christ said to love your enemies. It's a straight forward command.

So? :scratch:

Looks like you would give a glass of cold water to a man raping your wife because he became thirsty in the process? You must be consistent if what you claim is truth.

How exactly do you know what Jesus was speaking of.

The question is.... "How do you know?"

I am going by the historical context from in which he spoke. As to why he would have been motivated to even say such a thing.
 
Upvote 0

Buzz_B

Well-Known Member
Oct 15, 2017
894
161
70
Northwest Ohio
✟13,943.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
”genez said:
He is in control.
Just as I said, we both believe that. Where we differ is in how we are to let God have that control apart from our unwisely usurping him.

If the majority easily believed what I am saying of God to them, then, Revelation 11:18 and 16:12-21 would be wrong. And we know that can never happen. If the majority believed that they are to lay down their carnal weapons and forsake those carnal weapons, then, Revelation 11:18 and 16:12-21 would be wrong. And we know that can never happen. But it seems that many do not even believe that Revelation 11:18 and 16:12-21 will happen in the first place, else they would pay heed not to be party to man's destructive forces. Either that or they must believe that God will destroy the destructive military forces of man and yet save those who breathed life into those destructive military forces. Or perhaps they doubt that God can destroy sin and death so that they think God will always allow man to maintain order by military forces. When sin is defeated for all times the need of forced compliance by military forces shall no longer be. Until that time God merely tolerates your destructive military forces as a sort of necessary evil for the sake of maintaining a mere glimpse of order so that men can have at least enough freedom to search for God and his way. Those carnal military forces being approved of God to exist has only ever been temporary. It makes no sense that anyone should make the temporal a way of life. They will perish with the temporal that they not reinfect God's new order of things free of sin.

”genez said:
That is why He gave us the book of Numbers. Its a book that explains without a strong military there is no national freedom.
Where in the book of numbers do you read and interpret that from? Are you speaking what the book of Numbers actually speaks or our you asserting your own opinion of what it says?

It is helpful to first note that“Armies” or”Army” in the OT does not always mean “a military readied for carnal warfare”:

Numbers 33:1 “These are the journeys of the children of Israel, which went forth out of the land of Egypt with their armies under the hand of Moses and Aaron.” (KJV)

Numbers 33:1 “These are journeys of the sons of Israel who have come out of the land of Egypt, by their hosts, by the hand of Moses and Aaron..” (YLT)

The Hebrew “tsaba'” is often used only to denote being well organized in groups to be able and follow a leader in a well organized fashion for the purpose that none out of any of those groups might get lost. Carnal militias are organized to lose as few men as possible and in that way the groups of Israelite people fittingly compared to the organization of carnal militias without having to literally be carnal militias.

Due to their lack of faith on the whole as a people organized to God, Israel was punished by being made to wander in the wilderness: Numbers 32:13 “And the LORD'S anger was kindled against Israel, and he made them wander in the wilderness forty years, until all the generation, that had done evil in the sight of the LORD, was consumed.”

Despite that the successive generations of children followed in the same path as those God destroyed in the wilderness: Ezekiel 2:3 “And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day.” (KJV)

”genez said:
Book of Numbers was given to a people who had just witnessed to the parting of the Red Sea and watching Pharaoh's army destroyed. God determines if we need to fight or not. We do not get to pick and choose as some here think is the way. There is a time for peace. And, a time for war.
Are you claiming that God chooses when our nations war? Are you claiming that God supports wars over mineral and oil rights and over other selfish agendas which are often found to underlay the strife of nations today? If you blindly pledge your allegiance to your country and go blindly to war at your country's whim, how will you know whether God approves or disapproves of you and your battles? Will you just be gullible and suck down any facade of cause presented to you by your leaders who have proven countless times over to most often be motivated by commercial greed and desire for increased personal wealth?

Jesus told us that we cannot serve two masters, we cannot serve both mammon and God. Do you imagine that God will excuse you to serve a leader who serves mammon? If you have pledged your allegiance to God and then you pledge your allegiance to a country of men are you not already compromised? We have a choice to live for God or live for man. Living for man was brought about by sin. Even Atheists can live for a belief as to what is good for their fellow if that were the primary thing required. But no one can really live effectively for fellow unless they live first and foremost fully to God. And that at times means we will displease our fellow when God's way conflicts with his way. Yet the man who is over you in man's carnal military will court marshal you for standing strong for God when his way conflicts with God's. By spreading your affections too broadly you have created an impossible situation for yourself. Your affections should be reserved for God and those who like you love and honor God with all of their valuable things. In that way you will be as the salt of earth, seasoning all to God who are willing to take note to your example and acknowledge the superior way of peace it nets to you and yours. All your carnal military ways do is create outright enemies and false friends who only really play up to you to avoid your wrath. One never knows when such forced friends will betray you. That is not security. It is barbaric insanity.

”genez said:
One of the GREATEST fears a man can face in his lifetime is in battle in warfare.... Or, when facing violent criminality.
Who are you describing there? If that be true of men then it is because of they lack true faith: “Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in Gehenna.” Matthew 10:28

Hebrews 13:5-6 “Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee. So that we may boldly say, The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me.”

”genez said:
One of the GREATEST ways for God to display His power of grace? Is in such a man. I am tired of these self centered cowards who distort God's Word as a means to justify their weakness.
It is good to be careful how we judge others. What reason have you to be tired of other men as though you be more perfect than they?

”genez said:
"And He said to me, “My grace is sufficient for you, for
My strength is made perfect in weakness.” 2 Cor 12:9

Cowards are Scriptural sneaks. They distort and twist Scripture in fear of coming out and facing the enemy. God gives us times of needing self defense as a means to see how we are accepting His grace, or rejecting it. A person who refuses to take up arms yet is willing to be a medic in time of battle I believe God honors, because he was willing to put his life on the line for the freedom of his nation. But? All medics are trained in the use of a firearm. For what happens if the enemy breaks into where he may be treating someone? ITS ALL IN GOD'S HANDS.
OK, that is how you interpret what Paul said. But do you really care to know what Paul meant? He surely did not mean leaving out as a body member of Christ to serve as a body part in an army of man having a different leader as its head. Or do you not know that an army operates like a body? To whom you pledge your allegiance you belong, either to Christ as a member of his body with him as your head or to your country of flesh with another sinful human as your head. It is a conflict of interests to pledge yourself two ways. Your person will be unable to be fully available to either party to make your pledges good.

There are various forms of pacifist groups each having slightly differing beliefs the same as with non-pacifist religious groups. Some pacifist groups would tell you that to assist in war in any way is like holding the rifle while others pull the trigger. Many pacifist groups would not even approve of being a medic in service to the military for that very reason. And they would just tell you that if you are going to have any sharing at all in the evil of war then you should expect that it might cause moments where you must betray your faithfulness to God or accept to die. Even as a medic, the man putting himself in that situation knows that is a possibility. No man that believes killing others is sin would let others train him to kill. Not even as a requirement to serve as a medic. He would simply choose to let the dead bury their dead and continue on following Jesus.

You have been warned from long ago: Genesis 9:6 “Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.”

It was not righteousness that laid waste to so much of the middle-east. Though some of those you have conquered may claim to be your friend to escape your wrath, they and their children will remember what you have done and inside themselves they will always hate you. When you speak to them of righteousness they will see you as hypocrites speaking war out of one side of your mouth and peace out of the other side of your mouth. That is the harsh reality and you know that you too would feel as they do if the situation were reversed.

You promote living by a heaven of iron (your ruling sectors) and you treat the earth as your brass rather than God's. The heaven of iron was God's curse to his unfaithful people and so you advocate living by a curse.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SteveIndy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 27, 2007
421
178
75
Zionsville, Indiana
✟247,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
This is a very hot topic that I am sure many have noticed. Both in Christendom and also outside of it as well. I have a stance on this, and I know there are many different stances. I know of people personally, that are believers that feel that we should have weapons in our home for defense, and also those that do not believe we should defend in a way that brings bodily harm to anyone? It seems that this is a topic that is extremely controversial.

I am interested to know if there are any other believers that feel as if they would not own a gun or a weapon in self defense, and why. I am also interested in knowing from the other perspective, those that are for owning them and do own guns and weapons, and why? Or even if you desire to not own any for that purpose, but are not against someone owning them?

The N.T. is clear on this subject on two fronts: first, when Jesus disarmed Peter in the Garden He disarmed every Christian and we never hear again of their having weapons. Secondly, Christ and His Apostles are our examples. The primitive Church of the first three hundred years understood the position of the Apostles and Christ and lived as nonresistant Believers until Constantine and Augustine perverted Scripture for their own advantage. Today, the Church wholeheartedly embraces the teaching of those two apostates and joined that club of reprobates who now think it is okay to kill their enemies.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Willing-heart
Upvote 0

SteveIndy

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 27, 2007
421
178
75
Zionsville, Indiana
✟247,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
He also told Peter to keep the sword. He rebuked Peter for acting like a criminal, not for having a sword. What Peter did would be like you shooting a police officer who was knocking on your door to issue an arrest of a family member. So many miss that point. Peter was acting like a criminal. "Those who live by the sword"... spoke of the lifestyle of a criminal.

Sloppy thinking doesn't appear to be a problem with your opponents only. To begin with, Jesus did not tell Peter to keep the sword He simply told him to put it away, there is a big difference. After this incident, we never again hear of an account where the Apostles owned any kind of weapons. The question is, why did Peter have the sword to begin with? We find the answer to that question a few verses back when Jesus makes the proclamation that it was necessary for all prophecy concerning Him be fulfilled, then He tells us what that prophecy was that was unfulfilled, namely that He would be associated with criminals. With Peter's act of assaulting the High Priest's servant while Jesus was being arrested that prophecy was fulfilled.

Fearful men will go to any measure to justify protecting their flesh or their little piece of real estate by twisting Scripture.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Willing-heart
Upvote 0

razzelflabben

Contributor
Nov 8, 2003
25,814
2,508
63
Ohio
✟122,293.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Sloppy thinking doesn't appear to be a problem with your opponents only. To begin with, Jesus did not tell Peter to keep the sword He simply told him to put it away, there is a big difference. After this incident, we never again hear of an account where the Apostles owned any kind of weapons. The question is, why did Peter have the sword to begin with? We find the answer to that question a few verses back when Jesus makes the proclamation that it was necessary for all prophecy concerning Him be fulfilled, then He tells us what that prophecy was that was unfulfilled, namely that He would be associated with criminals. With Peter's act of assaulting the High Priest's servant while Jesus was being arrested that prophecy was fulfilled.

Fearful men will go to any measure to justify protecting their flesh or their little piece of real estate by twisting Scripture.
Keep going with this thought...what did Jesus say to Peter? He did NOT say that it was wrong to protect Him or that He was a criminal for pulling out his sword...He said..."11 At that, Jesus said to Peter, “Sheathe your sword! Am I not to drink the cup the Father has given Me?”" IOW's Peter was told to sheathe his sword because it was time for the PROPHECY to be fulfilled.

IOW's the only thing we can draw from this passage about the OP question is that it is about God's will, His purpose, His timing, it's all about God. You know, like when I said that the best we can do from the standpoint of scripture is to ask God to show us what He needs us to do then obey that command no matter what that happens to be and how silly it might seem in the midst of what is going on at the time. It's all about God folks and trusting Him no matter what He asks of us.....bravo for catching the prophecy thing, I am impressed you caught it.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

GenemZ

Well-Known Member
Mar 1, 2004
22,141
1,372
73
Atlanta
✟77,142.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Just as I said, we both believe that. Where we differ is in how we are to let God have that control apart from our unwisely usurping him.

If the majority easily believed what I am saying of God to them, then, Revelation 11:18 and 16:12-21 would be wrong. And we know that can never happen. If the majority believed that they are to lay down their carnal weapons and forsake those carnal weapons, then, Revelation 11:18 and 16:12-21 would be wrong. And we know that can never happen. But it seems that many do not even believe that Revelation 11:18 and 16:12-21 will happen in the first place, else they would pay heed not to be party to man's destructive forces. Either that or they must believe that God will destroy the destructive military forces of man and yet save those who breathed life into those destructive military forces. Or perhaps they doubt that God can destroy sin and death so that they think God will always allow man to maintain order by military forces. When sin is defeated for all times the need of forced compliance by military forces shall no longer be. Until that time God merely tolerates your destructive military forces as a sort of necessary evil for the sake of maintaining a mere glimpse of order so that men can have at least enough freedom to search for God and his way. Those carnal military forces being approved of God to exist has only ever been temporary. It makes no sense that anyone should make the temporal a way of life. They will perish with the temporal that they not reinfect God's new order of things free of sin.

Where in the book of numbers do you read and interpret that from? Are you speaking what the book of Numbers actually speaks or our you asserting your own opinion of what it says?

It is helpful to first note that“Armies” or”Army” in the OT does not always mean “a military readied for carnal warfare”:

Numbers 33:1 “These are the journeys of the children of Israel, which went forth out of the land of Egypt with their armies under the hand of Moses and Aaron.” (KJV)

Numbers 33:1 “These are journeys of the sons of Israel who have come out of the land of Egypt, by their hosts, by the hand of Moses and Aaron..” (YLT)

The Hebrew “tsaba'” is often used only to denote being well organized in groups to be able and follow a leader in a well organized fashion for the purpose that none out of any of those groups might get lost. Carnal militias are organized to lose as few men as possible and in that way the groups of Israelite people fittingly compared to the organization of carnal militias without having to literally be carnal militias.

Due to their lack of faith on the whole as a people organized to God, Israel was punished by being made to wander in the wilderness: Numbers 32:13 “And the LORD'S anger was kindled against Israel, and he made them wander in the wilderness forty years, until all the generation, that had done evil in the sight of the LORD, was consumed.”

Despite that the successive generations of children followed in the same path as those God destroyed in the wilderness: Ezekiel 2:3 “And he said unto me, Son of man, I send thee to the children of Israel, to a rebellious nation that hath rebelled against me: they and their fathers have transgressed against me, even unto this very day.” (KJV)

Are you claiming that God chooses when our nations war? Are you claiming that God supports wars over mineral and oil rights and over other selfish agendas which are often found to underlay the strife of nations today? If you blindly pledge your allegiance to your country and go blindly to war at your country's whim, how will you know whether God approves or disapproves of you and your battles? Will you just be gullible and suck down any facade of cause presented to you by your leaders who have proven countless times over to most often be motivated by commercial greed and desire for increased personal wealth?

Jesus told us that we cannot serve two masters, we cannot serve both mammon and God. Do you imagine that God will excuse you to serve a leader who serves mammon? If you have pledged your allegiance to God and then you pledge your allegiance to a country of men are you not already compromised? We have a choice to live for God or live for man. Living for man was brought about by sin. Even Atheists can live for a belief as to what is good for their fellow if that were the primary thing required. But no one can really live effectively for fellow unless they live first and foremost fully to God. And that at times means we will displease our fellow when God's way conflicts with his way. Yet the man who is over you in man's carnal military will court marshal you for standing strong for God when his way conflicts with God's. By spreading your affections too broadly you have created an impossible situation for yourself. Your affections should be reserved for God and those who like you love and honor God with all of their valuable things. In that way you will be as the salt of earth, seasoning all to God who are willing to take note to your example and acknowledge the superior way of peace it nets to you and yours. All your carnal military ways do is create outright enemies and false friends who only really play up to you to avoid your wrath. One never knows when such forced friends will betray you. That is not security. It is barbaric insanity.

Who are you describing there? If that be true of men then it is because of they lack true faith: “Fear not them which kill the body, but are not able to kill the soul: but rather fear him which is able to destroy both soul and body in Gehenna.” Matthew 10:28

Hebrews 13:5-6 “Let your conversation be without covetousness; and be content with such things as ye have: for he hath said, I will never leave thee, nor forsake thee. So that we may boldly say, The Lord is my helper, and I will not fear what man shall do unto me.”

It is good to be careful how we judge others. What reason have you to be tired of other men as though you be more perfect than they?

OK, that is how you interpret what Paul said. But do you really care to know what Paul meant? He surely did not mean leaving out as a body member of Christ to serve as a body part in an army of man having a different leader as its head. Or do you not know that an army operates like a body? To whom you pledge your allegiance you belong, either to Christ as a member of his body with him as your head or to your country of flesh with another sinful human as your head. It is a conflict of interests to pledge yourself two ways. Your person will be unable to be fully available to either party to make your pledges good.

There are various forms of pacifist groups each having slightly differing beliefs the same as with non-pacifist religious groups. Some pacifist groups would tell you that to assist in war in any way is like holding the rifle while others pull the trigger. Many pacifist groups would not even approve of being a medic in service to the military for that very reason. And they would just tell you that if you are going to have any sharing at all in the evil of war then you should expect that it might cause moments where you must betray your faithfulness to God or accept to die. Even as a medic, the man putting himself in that situation knows that is a possibility. No man that believes killing others is sin would let others train him to kill. Not even as a requirement to serve as a medic. He would simply choose to let the dead bury their dead and continue on following Jesus.

You have been warned from long ago: Genesis 9:6 “Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.”

It was not righteousness that laid waste to so much of the middle-east. Though some of those you have conquered may claim to be your friend to escape your wrath, they and their children will remember what you have done and inside themselves they will always hate you. When you speak to them of righteousness they will see you as hypocrites speaking war out of one side of your mouth and peace out of the other side of your mouth. That is the harsh reality and you know that you too would feel as they do if the situation were reversed.

You promote living by a heaven of iron (your ruling sectors) and you treat the earth as your brass rather than God's. The heaven of iron was God's curse to his unfaithful people and so you advocate living by a curse.
Its not that I would not want to answer you. Its just too much to do so with. One point, or two, would have sufficed.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.