- Feb 27, 2016
- 7,319
- 9,223
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Protestant
- Marital Status
- Married
Should we teach handwriting any more?
"The US state of Illinois has passed a law requiring school students to learn joined-up handwriting, or "cursive", overriding the governor's veto.
It is no longer a requirement in US schools, and some countries have dropped the skill from the curriculum or made it optional.
Why, then, do some - like the UK - still insist on it in a digital age? Shouldn't children learn to type effectively instead?
...
One argument for the importance joined-up writing is that it's usually faster and more fluid for note-taking than printing letters.
But a skilled typist can copy words down even faster - so after early childhood, is there any benefit?
The evidence so far suggests that writing by hand retains its benefits for memorisation long beyond early childhood development.
A 2014 study from UCLA, titled The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard, found exactly that.
It studied laptop use among university students, and said it could be "impairing learning because their use results in shallower processing."
I was shocked when I read there were schools that no longer taught writing beyond the letters themselves, that merely expected typing.
The problem is that once laws need to be enacted to force something to be taught in schools, then it is definitely on the way out. What society considers useful usually does not need to be forced to be taught, it just is. Research seems to suggest handwriting to be important for memory and gaining understanding, that the act of writing aids knowledge.
This seems to be the ongoing trend. We sacrifice depth for superficial understanding. People don't research topics anymore, they just uncritically read a shallow wikipedia page.
I am a doctor, and I realise the irony of my rant on handwriting, but I see my colleagues do something very similar. They don't use their stethoscopes to pick up heart murmurs, but wait for formal ultrasounds. No one takes manual blood pressures anymore, and seldom feel the pulse. We sacrifice manual skills for the ease and streamlining of technology, losing information and ability in the process.
As studies on handwriting suggests, we lose some grasp of our subject matter when typing, engage in more rote learning, so we are undermining critical thinking. It makes one feel like Boethius watching how civilisation tumbles in on itself.
Note: Yes, my handwriting is terrible.
"The US state of Illinois has passed a law requiring school students to learn joined-up handwriting, or "cursive", overriding the governor's veto.
It is no longer a requirement in US schools, and some countries have dropped the skill from the curriculum or made it optional.
Why, then, do some - like the UK - still insist on it in a digital age? Shouldn't children learn to type effectively instead?
...
One argument for the importance joined-up writing is that it's usually faster and more fluid for note-taking than printing letters.
But a skilled typist can copy words down even faster - so after early childhood, is there any benefit?
The evidence so far suggests that writing by hand retains its benefits for memorisation long beyond early childhood development.
A 2014 study from UCLA, titled The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard, found exactly that.
It studied laptop use among university students, and said it could be "impairing learning because their use results in shallower processing."
I was shocked when I read there were schools that no longer taught writing beyond the letters themselves, that merely expected typing.
The problem is that once laws need to be enacted to force something to be taught in schools, then it is definitely on the way out. What society considers useful usually does not need to be forced to be taught, it just is. Research seems to suggest handwriting to be important for memory and gaining understanding, that the act of writing aids knowledge.
This seems to be the ongoing trend. We sacrifice depth for superficial understanding. People don't research topics anymore, they just uncritically read a shallow wikipedia page.
I am a doctor, and I realise the irony of my rant on handwriting, but I see my colleagues do something very similar. They don't use their stethoscopes to pick up heart murmurs, but wait for formal ultrasounds. No one takes manual blood pressures anymore, and seldom feel the pulse. We sacrifice manual skills for the ease and streamlining of technology, losing information and ability in the process.
As studies on handwriting suggests, we lose some grasp of our subject matter when typing, engage in more rote learning, so we are undermining critical thinking. It makes one feel like Boethius watching how civilisation tumbles in on itself.
Note: Yes, my handwriting is terrible.