Christian values

zephcom

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2017
2,396
1,650
76
Pacific Northwest
✟87,947.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Married
Are you familiar with the term "strawman?"



Tell me what you know about the teachings of Jesus that you think precluded me from voting for the least objectionable candidate.



I'm sure "some" people do. Is it now acceptable to cast aspersions on entire groups of people based on their lowest common denominator? Seems a little prejudicial to me.

I do note that once again you avoid the direct question, "how do you reconcile the teachings of Jesus with having voted for that particular candidate?" And I didn't say that there was a teaching which precluded you from voting for the least objectionable candidate. I said there was no teaching which required to to vote for the least objectionable candidate.

In fact, the teachings of Jesus are such that they give broad goals and leave how the goals are to be reached up to the Follower. My suggestion is that if NEITHER candidate represents something close to Jesus' teachings, a Follower can choose to not vote for either.

It has always been acceptable to cast aspersions on entire groups of people based on their lowest common denominator. That is why for decades Black people have all been assumed to be thieves, drug dealers, and criminals in general, why Jews have all been considered hoarders of money, why the Irish are thought of as drunks, it is why Trump got away with calling 'illegal aliens' drug dealers, rapists and criminals, and why Muslims are all considered terrorists.

Only White people think they should not be judged by their lowest common denominator while they get to do that to everyone else.

Welcome to equality.
 
Upvote 0

zephcom

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2017
2,396
1,650
76
Pacific Northwest
✟87,947.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Married
I didn't say the term "dog whistle" wasn't factual. What lacked a factual basis was your opinion about Christian values.



And who here is disagreeing with you on that point? But for you to state this is what is meant when Christians talk of Christian values in the context of politics has about as much validity as Hillary running across the tarmac as she landed under sniper fire in Bosnia.

Look, at some point in time the extreme left is just going to have to realize that screaming "RACIST!!!" at everyone with whom they disagree isn't a viable means of persuasion anymore. They should have gotten the memo by now. It was dated November 8th.

I'm good with you not agreeing with me on the idea that my idea of Christian Values isn't factual. I have been on Electronic forums since the days of 300 baud modems and local bulletin boards. I'm completely convinced that my concept of the meaning of the Christian Values dog whistle is completely correct.

And the fact that it continues to exist is because Christianity itself refuses to deny it and call it out as wrong every time it is used.

The reality today is that there is no longer any other meaning for Christian Values except that dog whistle. JESUS' values revolve around only one thing...Love.

Taking people's health care away from them is not loving, defending agents of the state from prosecution when they murder people is not loving, denying women the right to decide what is right for their own bodies is not loving, ordering wars of conquest is not loving, harassing others for their sexual orientation is not loving, supporting capital punishment is not loving, waterboarding prisoners is not loving, and the list goes on and on.

So just which "value" are Christians talking about when they use the term in regard to politics? Every single one I've come across in some thirty or more years on forums have been designed to harm someone.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Phil 1:21

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2017
5,869
4,399
United States
✟144,842.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And the fact that it continues to exist is because Christianity itself refuses to deny it and call it out as wrong every time it is used.

I think it's ridiculous when people on the extreme right use that line of "reasoning" to promote bigotry against Muslims. It's no less ridiculous when the extreme left uses it to promote their bigotry against Christians.

Taking people's health care away from them is not loving

At what point do we stop stealing from one group of people in favor of another group? Please tell me where exactly is the line.

defending agents of the state from prosecution when they murder people is not loving

Aside from members of law enforcement, is there anyone else whom you feel entitled to deprive of their constitutional right to due process?

denying women the right to decide what is right for their own bodies is not loving

As opposed to dismembering unborn babies in the womb because their an inconvenience to their "mothers?"

harassing others for their sexual orientation is not loving

I have yet to see anyone here disagreeing with that position.

supporting capital punishment is not loving

It's Biblical.
 
Upvote 0

Allandavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2016
8,056
6,929
70
Sydney
✟230,565.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
At what point do we stop stealing from one group of people in favor of another group? Please tell me where exactly is the line.

At what point do we stop making a fair contribution to our society as a whole?

As opposed to dismembering unborn babies in the womb because their an inconvenience to their "mothers?"

"they're"...and they aren't babies....and there are many reasons for women to make that choice...

It's Biblical.

So is the stoning of gays....so what?
 
Upvote 0

Phil 1:21

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2017
5,869
4,399
United States
✟144,842.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
At what point do we stop making a fair contribution to our society as a whole?

The people stealing from others always seem to feel they're entitled.

"they're"...and they aren't babies....and there are many reasons for women to make that choice...

Ah yes, pretending to value human life while refusing to defend the most vulnerable examples of it. How lovely.
 
Upvote 0

Presbyterian Continuist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 28, 2005
21,813
10,794
76
Christchurch New Zealand
Visit site
✟830,504.00
Country
New Zealand
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
Right off the top let me admit that this is one article from a newspaper which is left leaning and it is one community in America. It is hardly what one would call comprehensive.

For those in the Party of Trump, the Republicans — not the president — are to blame

These are people who identify as Christian and if one assumes the quotes are accurate, and there is no reason to believe they aren't since I don't see outrage over them at this point, I don't see anything there that resembles Jesus and especially His second commandment.

Should Christianity as a religion continue to remain silent and allow people in America and the rest of the planet to assume silence is agreement?
Christian values are clearly set out in 1 Corinthians 13 and Galatians 5:22,23). Any conduct is not consistent with those lists, is not Christian conduct. The scripture says that those who do not have the spirit of Christ are none of His. Therefore, those who conduct themselves according to those two scriptural passages are the only ones who has the spirit of Christ.
 
Upvote 0

Dave-W

Welcoming grandchild #7, Arturus Waggoner!
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2014
30,521
16,866
Maryland - just north of D.C.
Visit site
✟771,800.00
Country
United States
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Elections come down to two candidates. I found Trump the least objectionable of the two.
I found both so objectionable I write-in voted for my daughter.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Phil 1:21
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

zephcom

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2017
2,396
1,650
76
Pacific Northwest
✟87,947.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Married
I think it's ridiculous when people on the extreme right use that line of "reasoning" to promote bigotry against Muslims. It's no less ridiculous when the extreme left uses it to promote their bigotry against Christians.



At what point do we stop stealing from one group of people in favor of another group? Please tell me where exactly is the line.



Aside from members of law enforcement, is there anyone else whom you feel entitled to deprive of their constitutional right to due process?



As opposed to dismembering unborn babies in the womb because their an inconvenience to their "mothers?"



I have yet to see anyone here disagreeing with that position.



It's Biblical.
You are free to think something is ridiculous if you choose. However the reality is that people's perception of a product or religion is largely based on what they hear and see. But let me make myself really clear on one issue, it is Christianity that I am against. It is NOT Christians I'm against. Far too many people seem unable to grasp that Christianity is a religion and is not them personally.

Stealing from one group of people in favor of another group?? I've never advocated stealing from anyone. Taxing a population for money to use for the benefit of all is not stealing. And it is disingenuous to suggest that it is.

Remember, it was Jesus who said, "From everyone who has been given much, much will be demanded; and from the one who has been entrusted with much, much more will be asked."

I never suggested that anyone deprive police from their right to due process. If anyone is being denied their right to due process it is the people law enforcement execute on the streets of America. I will suggest that laws which are designed to protect police officers from any prosecution should be modified so that officers are no longer allowed simply recited the phrase, "I was scared for my life" and be excused from even the most obvious case of murder. We have made turned our police into an occupying military force rather than a security force designed to protect us from criminals. Despite your attempts to misrepresent my position, I am not anti-law enforcement. I am in favor of responsible law enforcement.

And again you resort to inflammatory rhetoric to misrepresent my point with your 'dismembering unborn babies' comment. The abortion issue is not something that justifies denying women the right to control their own health care. It is, however, an issue which American politicians and the Christian religion likes to use to inflame people to support their causes.

The reality is that taking away a woman's control over their health issues will not stop abortion. It will make more 'criminals' to put into our already over crowded prison, but it will do nothing at all to stop abortion. It never has in the past and never will in the future.

The reality is that the American culture creates the situation where women are pressured into making the decision to abort a pregnancy. And until those culture issues are changed abortions will continue either legally or illegally. When women can be assured they will be able earn a salary as high as men so they can support a family and when women who choose to not have an abortion are viewed by the males in this culture as desirable for marriage instead of viewed as [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]s, the abortion rate will go down. And inflammatory rhetoric will not change that reality.

It is also Biblical that Jesus said that He fulfilled the Law and that His Two Commandments replaced the Law. It is the fault of Christianity that so many Christians think they are supposed to be both Jews and Christians depending on what suits their fancy.

In Matthew 5, Jesus said this, "17 “Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them."

In Matthew 22, right after Jesus gave His Two Commandments He said this, "40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”

When one practices His two commandments, they are, according to Jesus, complying with both the Law and the Prophets. Christianity will try to tell you that isn't true but the Bible really does say exactly that.

For a Follower of Jesus, the entire 'Old Testament' is nothing more than historical information. Nothing in it has any binding control over a Follower. The binding control is Jesus' Two Commandments because EVERYTHING in the Law and Prophets hang from those two commandments.

Christianity should know that because the Bible IS their religious tome. The religion chooses not to teach that.
 
Upvote 0

Phil 1:21

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2017
5,869
4,399
United States
✟144,842.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
But let me make myself really clear on one issue, it is Christianity that I am against.

Your disdain for Christianity is quite clear. But I do thank you for at least being transparent about it. Most wolves wear sheep's clothing.

For a Follower of Jesus, the entire 'Old Testament' is nothing more than historical information.

My friend, you don't know how incorrect you are. Jesus didn't replace the Old Testament; He fulfilled it. If you don't understand the Old Testament, you don't understand Jesus.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Allandavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2016
8,056
6,929
70
Sydney
✟230,565.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Ah yes, pretending to value human life while refusing to defend the most vulnerable examples of it. How lovely.

...says the person who just got through 'valuing human life' by describing the poor and the destitute as thieves...
 
Upvote 0

zephcom

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2017
2,396
1,650
76
Pacific Northwest
✟87,947.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Married
Your disdain for Christianity is quite clear. But I do thank you for at least being transparent about it. Most wolves wear sheep's clothing.



My friend, you don't know how incorrect you are. Jesus didn't replace the Old Testament; He fulfilled it. If you don't understand the Old Testament, you don't understand Jesus.

Jesus fulfilled the Law and the Prophets. When one fulfills a contract, like ones house mortgage, one no longer has an obligation to that contract. It no longer has any binding effect.

He set up new obligations for those who choose to follow Him. They are His Two Great Commandments.

One can use the Old Testament as historical information. One can use the Old Testament to learn about the religion Jesus was a part of and why the Jews were looking for a Messiah. But the laws, rules and rituals of the Old Testament no longer carry any obligation on the Followers of Jesus because Jesus fulfilled those obligations. The obligation of Followers is to obey Jesus' Commandments.
 
Upvote 0

Phil 1:21

Well-Known Member
Apr 3, 2017
5,869
4,399
United States
✟144,842.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Jesus fulfilled the Law and the Prophets. When one fulfills a contract, like ones house mortgage, one no longer has an obligation to that contract. It no longer has any binding effect.

He set up new obligations for those who choose to follow Him. They are His Two Great Commandments.

One can use the Old Testament as historical information. One can use the Old Testament to learn about the religion Jesus was a part of and why the Jews were looking for a Messiah. But the laws, rules and rituals of the Old Testament no longer carry any obligation on the Followers of Jesus because Jesus fulfilled those obligations. The obligation of Followers is to obey Jesus' Commandments.

You really don't understand Christianity, but I pray that one day the Lord opens your heart to the truth. The fact that He brought you here is encouraging.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Allandavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2016
8,056
6,929
70
Sydney
✟230,565.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0