- May 13, 2017
- 212
- 136
- 80
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
The truth is that Matt 24 was not stitched correctly in the formation of the bible. It is actually 2 Prophecies in one. One being the result of the fall of the temple in 70 A.D, and the other being the End of the World. If you truly like me to show you how what im saying is true, then Pm me and i will show you. Otherwise, continue to study for yourself but i guarantee you, you will never see it until it is revealed to you.
Any serious Bible student who is objective can decompose Matthew 24-25. Most often Christians follow what they have been taught rather than challenging what they were taught. For those of us of normal intelligence this might be a difficult endeavor, but it is doable.
If a Bible student will start with a harmony of the gospels and the recognition that the Apostle Matthew's account is not primarily chronological but topical, the student is on the right path. The main obstacle when entering the study of the Olivet Discourse is to have the preconceived notion that Matthew 24:4-31 describes events which are in our future simply because the student believes these events have not happened. Discovering that they have happened within forty years of the Ascension of Christ will allow the Bible student to be more objective. Such a misconception is usually the result of not reading commentaries with differing views. Also, reading "The War of the Jews" by Josephus opens up a wealth of information relevant to the "great tribulation" as events during this war.
Generally, proper interpretation of the Bible requires a knowledge of the symbolic-figurative-apocalyptic language as used in the Bible. Taking such terms literally or in an absolute sense (and not as hyperbole) will always result in the misunderstanding of scripture.
Last edited:
Upvote
0