I agree. It's tough. Do you have any sense what fraction of churches actually deal reasonably with abuse?This is a tough read, but a really helpful look at dynamics of domestic violence as it relates to Christian faith. I thought others here might appreciate it, too:
'Submit to your husbands': Women told to endure domestic violence in the name of God
They compare it with the sexual abuse situation. I see the comparison. But churches were forced by the Law to deal with that. I'm not convinced that they would have otherwise. The issue was abuse by clergy or occurring in churches, so the churches had clear responsibility. Although pastors can be abusers, the problem identified in the article is primarily with churches giving bad counsel to members. Legal responsibility there is less clear, so it's not surprising that progress has been slower than in the sexual abuse scandals.
There's reason to be shy of charging pastors for bad sermons or bad advice in counseling. The simplest approach would probably be to create a legal duty to report abuse, as there as in my US states for abuse of children. Most, but not all, US states recognize privileged communications. But that would be if an abuser confessed. I don't see how it could cover reports from the victim or observations that someone seems to have been abused.
Upvote
0