Constantine the Sinner
Well-Known Member
He didn't have to, he did it out of love.Thanks for your comments. Before I explain the Biblical teaching of Justification. Can you clarify Why Christ had to satisfy the Law?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
He didn't have to, he did it out of love.Thanks for your comments. Before I explain the Biblical teaching of Justification. Can you clarify Why Christ had to satisfy the Law?
They're wrong. We baptize and commune infants.You speak differently from others I have engaged with. They say that not until a person personally sins, that they need Christ. But that people are not included in the judgement of the first Adam. Please explain.
It's mystical, and therefore not something that can be readily understood except in the Spirit. It does involve bodily communion with Christ, and a cutting away of the passions. Those who have become deeply graced are virtually indifferent to insult or compliment, heat or cold, being dead to all things save Christ; money to them is nothing, they could be given a million dollars and robbed an hour later without so much as a change of expression. This is not self-control, it is mystical death, your body and soul actually joining Christ in his death.Whether one believes (as do Calvinists) that regeneration preceeds faith or the other way around (as do Arminians) -- we all believe that initial salvation includes responding to the "prompts" of God.
I'm not sure what you mean by "sharing in Christ's death".
If that has to do with dying to self daily and taking up His cross in that way - most Protestants would have no trouble using that language.
If, on the other hand, it is meant in the same sense that, say, Mother Theresa meant it - we would have a big problem.
To paraphase her - we earn our way to Heaven by dying to self in the form of good works.
She also taught that any religion could make it to Heaven as long as the person following it "filled up what was lacking in the sacrifice of Jesus Christ" by suffering himself.
To that end she was know to have withheld pain medications from the dying in order that they might more likely make it to Heaven.
I doubt that Orthodox would think that way any more than would Protestants.
Satan gained control over the world with the fall, thus all are in bondage to him. He is the prince of this world. Christ came to liberate us and to transform us into God, since Christ is God and we are called to be his body.You speak differently from others I have engaged with. They say that not until a person personally sins, that they need Christ. But that people are not included in the judgement of the first Adam. Please explain.
Christ is both the source and object of our transformation.Yes, we believe God's present in both as well. But reading your post, I notice that Salvation lies in the Transformation & Process, rather than in Christ our Mediator. Who stood in our stead and took upon his head the full wrath of a Holy Righteous God. Its Christ and His Perfect Righteousness that PROPITIATED the wrath of God. Only in Christ can we live and grow in the Faith to Persevere as Saints. Because our victory has already be won.
Now walking in holiness is a duty of all Christians. Because we are dead to sin and alive to God in Christ. Only in Christ our Mediator we find life. Not in our transformation. Sorry but this is the old teaching of legalism. Placing hope in our own efforts, instead of finding it in another. When Paul preached the Gospel of Christ. He was condemned by the Pharisees for antinomianism. What Paul once condemned and executed Christians for; Faith in the Gospel apart from the Law. He now was preaching and teaching, and was condemned by the Pharisees and Judaizers .
You signed Vatican I, which declared the infallibility of the Pope. Please stop pretending to be Orthodox.
Also, during festival, our parish is open for tours.
Please stop lying about an "ethnic barrier". They didn't say you were the improper ethnicity, they said you had to convert, that was the real barrier you weren't prepared to cross.
No, as a Catholic you have to accept the Council of Florence. You do not have the same faith as the Orthodox.
Then Christ would have been banned.
You've made that staement several times now.We don't believe God killed himself.
Yes, because he explained them when I expressed doubts. A parish said he could not come in if he wasn't interested in converting. A bad policy, certainly, but not ethnic prejudice.
You signed Vatican I, which declared the infallibility of the Pope. Please stop pretending to be Orthodox.
Monks are not necessarily ordained--that is, becoming a deacon, priest, or bishops.bro branden
I am not overly familiar with the orthodox or the catholic faith....however
I believe the problem is Monks come for these 2 faiths.......
And some of these churches feel you are impersonating one of their clergy without being ordained......when you walk into their groups.....
and they feel you are being a fraud...
You gotta understand their viewpoint as anyone from any church business or orgainization would not allow you to look or pretend to be in their orgainization if in fact you are not aproved by thier orgainization.......
for example you can't impersonate a police officer ......
I believe a guy got arrested for impersonating an army officer awhile back....
I had a friend of mine who went to Jerusalem back in the 1990's and bought a Talit or prayer shawl.......
For the next 15 years or so he thought he was Jewish and could only worship with Jewish believers although there were none around this area......
He decided he would not associate with us gentiles in our churches....although he had no proof that he was jewish...and we tried to tell him this....
He would wear his Talit sometimes to gentile churches sometimes and they would ask him to sit down and not make a show or others would ask him if he was jewish and he would go into his long ordeal about how he could have been jewish.......
I believe he has now outgrown this and now he thinks he is batman and he and his new wife wear batman and batwoman costumes all over town even wore it to the hospital he had to go to recently....
still to be a Monk you have to have lived in a convent or something....
just saying........
It would be good to actually be able to see the above. I've heard of it before but no one has ever been able to provide solid documentation of the fact. The bishops were not permitted to disagree, however, with the decisions of the council, were they. This is what comes across as schizophrenic. They have to assent to Western doctrine, all the while claiming to believe differently to those doctrines. The above also makes monk Brendan's claims of disunity among Orthodox bishops ring hollow. On the Orthodox side it will merely be on matters of discipline where they differ, while on the Catholic side monk Brendan claims disunity on doctrine. Odd that he finds this a picture of stability.As a matter of fact, the Melkite bishops LEFT Rome before the vote was taken. When they, including their patriarch Gregory Yussef, were later forced to sign the decree, they added a caveat: "Provided the rights and privileges of the Eastern Patriarchs and bishops are respected, and without prejudice against or diminution of these rights."
This is what comes across as schizophrenic.