This verse says absolutely nothing about the Sabbath.Is the Sabbath is BINDING on both Jews and also gentile believers? Let's answer the question "sola scriptura" and in so doing -- return to the actual subject of the thread.
In the OT Isaiah 66:23 states explicitly that the Sabbath applies to "All mankind" in Is 66:23
Please explain how you get that from this passage when it says nothing about the Sabbath.In Gen 2:1-3 the Sabbath applies to "All mankind" -- Adam and Eve.
Not in the context of this verse. Jesus is having a conversation with Jews. Besides such a position violates Ex 31:13. So either Moses is correct or Jesus is correct. It simply can't be both.In Mark 2:27 the Sabbath applies to "All mankind" -- "The Sabbath was made for mankind"
Sorry but tat can't be found in my Bible version of the 10 Cs found in Ex 20.In Rev 14:7 it is all mankind that is called to worship God who "created the heavens and the earth the seas and the springs of water" - a quote from the Sabbath commandment
This verse says nothing about the 7th day Sabbath. "Sabbath rest" is a single word in the Greek. It isn't the Greek word used for Sabbath.in Heb 4 "There remains therefore a Sabbath rest for the people God" actually quotes the Sabbath Commandment and says it 'remains' just as it was in Psalms 95.
You have no idea about what John is saying. You think and believe the verse says the 10 Cs and the faith of Jesus is some religious belief system. Neither are true.In Rev 14:12 the saints "KEEP the commandments of God and their faith in Jesus".
You have a reading problem. It says plainly joined themselves to the Lord meaning the covenant issued at Sinai. Ex 12:48 applies to this person and not the stranger.In 56:1-8 the Gentiles are singled out and specifically blessed for keeping the weekly Sabbath.
Not at all what James says. First James is speaking to Jews. Second James is saying violate one of the commandments and you're guilty of breaking the whole law. IOW the Law is a single indivisible unit.James 2 points specifically to the TEN Commandments and says that the common element that would make us "guilty of all" is based on "He who said" -- and as it turns out God said all ten of them not just nine.
True and Paul isn't requiring this of parents who also have parents. It simply doesn't apply to everyone.In Eph 6:2 - the entire unit of TEN is being identified when the text says "Honor thy father and mother for this is the FIRST commandment with a promise" -- that requires a specific unit of Law -- and is only true of the TEN.
You even point out to which gentiles this applies to. Its limited by those specifics.Ex 20:8-11 it is BOTH Israel AND the gentile that "stays within their gates" that is bound to keep the Sabbath.
Big deal. That simply doesn't show obligation.In Acts 18:4 both Gentiles AND Jews are worshiping "every Sabbath" so also in Acts 17:1-4 so also in Acts 13.
Your idea of this passage won't stand up to the text oft he passage. The passage says "new...Not according to..." and includes this conjunction showing a difference "But."In your own statement you admit that the Jews would have known that the TEN Commandments - including the 4th Commandment were included in the "LAW of God" - so then when Jeremiah says that the NEW Covenant includes God writing His "LAW on our heart and mind" both Jeremiah and HIS readers would have known that it was sin to violate the Sabbath and that the 4th Commandment was included in God's moral LAW.
MalarkeyFacts so glaringly obvious that even the majority of pro-sunday scholarship does not turn a blind-eye to this particular Bible "detail" -- as we saw on page 1 of this thread
Feb 13, 2015 #1
Nope, it doesn't.Which helps the serious Bible student avoid the blunder of imagining that only SDAs see this Bible detail.
bugkiller[/quote][/quote]
Upvote
0