- Jun 18, 2006
- 3,851,691
- 51,627
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Then get a KJB in your own language.What if you dont speak english at all? Or very well?
Upvote
0
Then get a KJB in your own language.What if you dont speak english at all? Or very well?
I think yours is just fine in the way it expresses itself.Then get a KJB in your own language.
Example please. For my part, two examples come to mind:Like many others here, I suspect, I am disturbed by the evidence of relatively widespread ignorance of Scripture...
And the witch of Endor?
Is that No True Scotsman as well?
Climate change deniers also utilize many of the creation science tactics as well; i.e., cherry picked data and Gish gallops.
BUT ---it was not a curse. It was a metaphorical/mythological explanation for a whole raft of things including pain in childbirth.
Hmmm.That appears to be a different sort of "witch". Perhaps you should check the original Hebrew for both.
Sign of the times.Subduction Zone said:I note that no righteous Jews stoned her.
And you're making the mistake of assuming everyone followed the letter of the Law, like they were supposed to.Subduction Zone said:You are making the mistake of taking a translation literally.
The "curse" is worse than the "disease."Subduction Zone said:The KJV is definitely lacking at times when it came to words or thoughts translated into modern English.
God explicitly said
Then get a KJB in your own language.
I'm sure you don't have any problem harping about the Bible saying this or that in the "original Hebrew."And if there arent any?
And still, that would be a translation and therefore different.
Pertaining to the KJV: The New Testament was translated from Greek, the Old Testament from Hebrew and Aramaic, and the Apocrypha from Greek and Latin.I'm sure you don't have any problem harping about the Bible saying this or that in the "original Hebrew."
Why are you now harping someone might not have One in their own language?
Reading the Bible in his own language is the last thing I would assume a scientist would want to do.
Yes, you can all be wrong. Also the laws of thermodynamics have nothing to do with evolution. That argument has been debunked so many times already.
The laws of thermodynamics have absolutely nothing to do with evolution and everything to do with heat transfer.And yet it can not be shown ever that anything
goes from disorder to order without a plan, and
without an intelligent and purposed application
of energy. Without both, adding energy is only
destructive.
Like many others here, I suspect, I am disturbed by the evidence of relatively widespread ignorance of science as well as, perhaps more sinisterly, the outright distrust of the findings of science. In this regard, I wonder about a "critical mass" effect - if enough people believe enough wacky things, they need no longer feel ashamed of their views and, yes, may even revel in their ignorance and off-kilter thinking. In short, if enough people believe wonky stuff, there is an illusion of "power in numbers": we can't all be wrong in thinking that global warming is a massive conspiracy, or that evolution violates the laws of thermodynamics - you name it.
Perhaps if we whittle away enough people from the herd of the ignorant, the rest of the herd will dissipate (since it would then be effectively below the critical mass).
The opposite is true.Like many others here, I suspect, I am disturbed by the evidence of relatively widespread ignorance of science as well as, perhaps more sinisterly, the outright distrust of the findings of science. In this regard, I wonder about a "critical mass" effect - if enough people believe enough wacky things, they need no longer feel ashamed of their views and, yes, may even revel in their ignorance and off-kilter thinking. In short, if enough people believe wonky stuff, there is an illusion of "power in numbers": we can't all be wrong in thinking that global warming is a massive conspiracy, or that evolution violates the laws of thermodynamics - you name it.
Perhaps if we whittle away enough people from the herd of the ignorant, the rest of the herd will dissipate (since it would then be effectively below the critical mass).
I'm sure you don't have any problem harping about the Bible saying this or that in the "original Hebrew."
Why are you now harping someone might not have One in their own language?
Reading the Bible in his own language is the last thing I would assume a scientist would want to do.
I was under the impression you atheists know the Bible better than Christians do.No, I personaly dont care for the bible at all and really dont care what it says in any language. But Im an atheist so that is to be expected.
I was under the impression you atheists know the Bible better than Christians do.
I was under the impression you atheists know the Bible better than Christians do.
Could be, I suppose.I think thats mostly a US thing