Sophrosyne
Let Your Light Shine.. Matt 5:16
Paul was taught these things by Jesus.Who said that? Paul? Or Jesus?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Paul was taught these things by Jesus.Who said that? Paul? Or Jesus?
Who said that? Paul? Or Jesus?
Or can we dismiss these texts in favor of equivocating between the Old Covenant and the Law of God such that God's commandments are to be "Abolished".
That NEW Covenant is in BOTH the OT and the NT.
The New Covenant is in the OT, found in the Covenant made with Abraham.
Through his seed all the nations would be blessed.
It is not the Sinai Covenant, which we are to cast out based on Galatians chapter 4.
That is Christ speaking and Jeremiah knew of the moral law of God - so also did his readers. It is the moral law of God that they knew then - to which he refers.
And of course Heb 8 points out that it was CHRIST's commandments at Sinai.
Again, you are attempting to substitute the Sinai Covenant in place of the Abrahamic Seed covenant and the commandments of Christ.
The Bible says Christ gave His commandments at Sinai.
Read Heb 8:6-10 - or if you wish I will quote it again.
Today - it is the moral law of Sinai but it is not the covenant with the nation.
God did not "cast out his law" rather "Do we then make void the LAW of God by our faith? God forbid! in fact we ESTABLISH the LAW of God" Rom 3:31
The LAW of God was not "a competing gospel" at odds with the actual Gospel.
Jer 31:
31 “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah—
32 not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt, My covenant which they broke, though I was a husband to them, says the Lord.
33 But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put My law in their minds, and write it on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.
34 No more shall every man teach his neighbor, and every man his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they all shall know Me, from the least of them to the greatest of them, says the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and their sin I will remember no more.”
That is Christ speaking and Jeremiah knew of the moral law of God - so also did his readers. It is the moral law of God that they knew then - to which he refers.
And of course Heb 8 points out that it was CHRIST's commandments at Sinai.
Heb 8
Heb 8:6 But now hath he (Christ) obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.
7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then no place would have been sought for a second.
8 Because finding fault with them, He says: (Christ says) “Behold, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah—
9 not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they did not continue in My covenant, and I disregarded them, says the Lord.
10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord: I will put My laws in their mind and write them on their hearts; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people.
And so it was Christ giving those commandments on Sinai -- it is Christ's commandments.
Thus in Gal 3 - it is not a competing gospel in the LAW - and in fact nothing in the LAW of God contradicts the Gospel.
Gal 3:21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
Gal 3
9 So then those who are of faith are blessed with Abraham, the believer.
Gen 26:5
5 because Abraham obeyed Me and kept My charge, My commandments, My statutes and My laws.”
Abraham was obedient to the LAW of God but not justified by works - rather justified by faith. The law was not a "competing Gospel"
Gal 3
10 For as many as are of the works of the Law are under a curse; for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who does not abide by all things written in the book of the law, to perform them.” 11 Now that no one is justified by the Law before God is evident; for, “The righteous man shall live by faith.” 12 However, the Law is not of faith; on the contrary, “He who practices them shall live by them.” 13 Christ redeemed us from the curse of the Law, having become a curse for us—for it is written, “Cursed is everyone who hangs on a tree”— 14 in order that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we would receive the promise of the Spirit through faith.
Gal 3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
Gal 3:17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.
(The Sinai Covenant cannot disannul the Abrahamic Promise. The Sinai Covenant was made 430 years after the Abrahamic Covenant.)
Gal 3:18 For if the inheritance be of the law, it is no more of promise: but God gave it to Abraham by promise.
(Our inheritance does not come through the Sinai law.)
Gal 3:19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator.
(The law was added until the promised Seed (Christ) would come.)
Gal 3:20 Now a mediator is not a mediator of one, but God is one.
Gal 3:21 Is the law then against the promises of God? God forbid: for if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law.
(The Sinai law cannot give life.)
Gal 3:22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
Gal 3:23 But before faith came, we were kept under the law, shut up unto the faith which should afterwards be revealed.
Gal 3:24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.
(The moral law shows us our sin until we come to faith in Christ.)
Gal 3:25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.
(Those indwelled with the Holy Spirit have the moral law inside of us.)
Gal 3:26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.
Where in Exodus 20 does it say that it is the moral law of Sinai but it is not the covenant with the nation?
Heb 8:6 But now hath he obtained a more excellent ministry, by how much also he is the mediator of a better covenant, which was established upon better promises.
(Not the same covenant as you are implying.)
Heb 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
Heb 8:8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
Heb 8:9 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
(The New Covenant is not according to the Sinai covenant, which they broke.)
Heb 8:10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:
Heb 8:11 And they shall not teach every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the Lord: for all shall know me, from the least to the greatest.
Heb 8:12 For I will be merciful to their unrighteousness, and their sins and their iniquities will I remember no more.
Heb 8:13 In that he saith, A new covenant, he hath made the first old. Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.
(The Sinai Covenant is obsolete.)
....................................................
Heb 7:12 For the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law.
....................................................
1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight.
1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment.
1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us.
The difference between Old and New Covenant is not the moral law that defines sin - the Commandments of God for as John says in the NT "SIN IS transgression of the LAW" 1 John 3:4 - that is how sin continues to be defined.
Rather the difference is the location of it.
under the NEW Covenant it is "written on the mind and heart" - Jer 31:31-33... Heb 8:6-10
Paul repeatedly stresses the Ten Commandment moral law of God as defining what sin is - in Romans 3, in Romans 7, in 1Cor 6.
So no doubt when in Rom 3:31 he says "Do we then make VOiD the Law of God by our faith - God forbid! In fact we ESTABLISH the Law of God" the same Law that in Romans 3 brings to light 'the knowledge of sin" and condemns "All the world"
The distinction is so clear that even the pro-sunday scholars "get the point' as we saw in the "Baptist Confession of Faith" and the "Westminster Confession of Faith" - a clear distinction between the moral law, the civil laws and the ceremonial laws at sinai.
Even the RCC itself seems to have figured that Bible detail out.
The distinction is so clear that even the pro-sunday scholars "get the point' as we saw in the "Baptist Confession of Faith" and the "Westminster Confession of Faith" - a clear distinction between the moral law, the civil laws and the ceremonial laws at sinai.
These are the same confessions of faith that mistakenly apply the Sinai covenant to Adam and Eve, before the fall.
"Thou shalt not commit adultery." Who would they have committed adultery with?