Because you've provided no support for the assertion other than restating it over and over and over. And over.
Please show that. I keep reading assertions, but then when I question you about your assertions you seem to decline to answer my questions.
I think that contraceptives clearly place a barrier within the interpersonal sharing of sex, because they allow a couple to seek sexual pleasure without respecting the woman's natural fertility cycle (and the man's fertility), and the procreative meaning of sex.
And asking pointless questions isn't going to change that fact.
I think we both have to try to answer the other person's questions.
I can, but I won't. Thanks for asking, though.
Are you going to get around to answering any of my questions? Is this really the best you have to support your faith?
Thanks for acknowledging that you have a belief system about sexual morality. May I ask why won't you talk about it, if your position is strong?
I know you didn't acknowledge any objective sexual morality, even as to rape. Could you explain that more? It seems like one would never see contraception as wrong if they don't believe in any absolute moral laws.
It seems fair that we would both have to explain our beliefs. If you want to really dialogue, that would be necessary.
I think that when people want to only question others and negate their beliefs, it is usually because their own belief system is questionable.
Upvote
0