A question for Old Earth Creationists

[juvenissun]

It demonstrates evolution because the fossil record describes evolution. You know, oldest simplistic organisms proceed by increasingly younger and more complex organisms; extinction events wiping out most life forms and giving rise to new and more diverse organisms. That's how.

Are you suggesting the evolution process has a direction?
This is my favorite argument whenever an evolutionist mentioned that.

 

[RickG]

Are you suggesting the evolution process has a direction?
This is my favorite argument whenever an evolutionist mentioned that.

No, evolution does not have a direction.

 

[juvenissun]

No, evolution does not have a direction.

So you do not make this silly statement from now on.

the fossil record describes evolution. You know, oldest simplistic organisms proceed by increasingly younger and more complex organisms;

 

[Aman777]

It demonstrates evolution because the fossil record describes evolution. You know, oldest simplistic organisms proceed by increasingly younger and more complex organisms; extinction events wiping out most life forms and giving rise to new and more diverse organisms. That's how..

Dear Readers, Not with Humankind, since Adam was made long BEFORE the oldest, simplistic, organisms, were created on the 5th Day, from the water, Gen 1:21 which was some 3.7 billion years ago, in man's time, which was Billions of years AFTER Adam was made. Gen 2:4-7

Some confuse "changes within His Kinds" for evolution, which simply speaking, IS the definition of evolution, BEFORE one has REJECTED God's Truth, and changed His Holy Word into Fantasy. Pretending that it's ok to claim that God is NOT telling the Literal Truth, some twist His Truth into Fables. 2Ti 4:4 And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.

Be careful of listening to those who reject God's Truth, as written in Scripture, for many False Prophets are gone out in the world. 1Jo 4:1

God set a Snare or a Trap which catches those who Falsely CLAIM we evolved from the common ancestor of Apes. In the last days, these Scoffers will be shown that their precious Theory of Evolution, which they so loudly proclaim, is nothing but a Satanic Lie designed to fool the gullible, and little children. The Snare is the Flood, which the all knowing Evols have stumbled over, and fallen into. God Bless you all.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Subduction Zone]

But we know that there was no flood. How could something that never happened be a "snare"?

Now if you want to try to discuss evolution logically, based on science I will be happy to do so. If you avoid science and depend on ideas that are neither science based nor Biblical you have no place here or at any other forum that I can think of.

 

[AV1611VET]

If you avoid science and depend on ideas that are neither science based nor Biblical you have no place here or at any other forum that I can think of.

Maybe you need to think a little deeper then, eh?

What if a person is a site supporter?

Okay with you if they post in the site they are supporting?

 

[PsychoSarah]

So you do not make this silly statement from now on.

Making an observation on what happens is not suggesting evolution has a direction. Things became more complex over time, it doesn't mean that evolution "intended" this to happen.

 

[RickG]

So you do not make this silly statement from now on.

Wow! Did you just get in a new supply of straw for your straw man argument?

 

[juvenissun]

Wow! Did you just get in a new supply of straw for your straw man argument?

When you hit the wall, this is the last rubbish you can throw out at the end.
Shame.

 

[RickG]

When you hit the wall, this is the last rubbish you can throw out at the end.
Shame.

Yeah right! Toss out a straw man then claim victory. You still have not explained the fossil record. How did it get there?

 

[Aman777]

But we know that there was no flood. How could something that never happened be a "snare"?

Now if you want to try to discuss evolution logically, based on science I will be happy to do so. If you avoid science and depend on ideas that are neither science based nor Biblical you have no place here or at any other forum that I can think of.

Dear SZ, Should we believe YOU or God? He tells us that there was a Flood which completely destroyed Adam's world, but YOU disagree. ll Peter 3:5 Perhaps it is your incomplete education which makes you say these things. Can YOU tell us what happened to the first world? Or must you claim that ONLY Science, which CANNOT tell us of Adam's world, knows more than God? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Aman777]

Yeah right! Toss out a straw man then claim victory. You still have not explained the fossil record. How did it get there?

Dear Readers, The above statement is ridiculous, since I did explain the fossil record and the OP ran away, like a dog with his tail between his legs. I suppose some people just like to play the all knowing scientist who considers Creationists to be imbeciles.

What is actually true is that NO scientist can stand the pressure brought against them by God's Holy Word which completely REFUTES the False ToE which SOME of them worship (praise). God Bless the poor, ignorant, scientists who believe that God is just Lying, and that they know more than He does. God Bless all of you, as well as those who are too arrogant to learn.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Queller]

How can you debate someone who makes it up as they go, and CLAIMS that is what the Bible means, in his Fantasy Land view.

Believe me, some of us wonder the same thing about you.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Dear SZ, Should we believe YOU or God? He tells us that there was a Flood which completely destroyed Adam's world, but YOU disagree. ll Peter 3:5 Perhaps it is your incomplete education which makes you say these things. Can YOU tell us what happened to the first world? Or must you claim that ONLY Science, which CANNOT tell us of Adam's world, knows more than God? God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

If given the choice, should I believe a modern person or an ancient goat herder on matters of the world? Honestly, even you would pick the modern person, Aman. Remember, when atheists such as myself are making decisions about credibility, the bible is written by ancient, relatively ignorant people. To us, it really is comparing people minus thousands of years of knowledge and people with that knowledge. It really isn't hard to see what would be considered more credible when you look at it this way.

 

[RickG]

Has Aman explained the fossil record without evolution yet? Anyone? I have him on ignore since he refuses to discuss any science, instead spams with scripture and preaches; so I don't see his posts, I just know he is posting.

 

[bhsmte]

Has Aman explained the fossil record without evolution yet? Anyone? I have him on ignore since he refuses to discuss any science, instead spams with scripture and preaches; so I don't see his posts, I just know he is posting.

Don't hold your breath.

 

[Aman777]

Believe me, some of us wonder the same thing about you.

Dear Queller, Hey there old buddy, old pal. Where have you been hiding? I suspect your confusion is caused by that Altered verson of Scripture you insist on believing. Keep studying and perhaps some day, you might be able to refute me Scripturally, but I doubt it. Good to see you again, and next time don't be such a stranger. It's good to see you again. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

 

[Subduction Zone]

Dear Queller, Hey there old buddy, old pal. Where have you been hiding? I suspect your confusion is caused by that Altered verson of Scripture you insist on believing. Keep studying and perhaps some day, you might be able to refute me Scripturally, but I doubt it. Good to see you again, and next time don't be such a stranger. It's good to see you again. God Bless you.

In Love,
Aman

Is there some version of scripture that is more magic than any other?

And why should anyone even try to debunk you scripturally? You forgot to show that your scripture is correct in the first place.

 

[Aman777]

Is there some version of scripture that is more magic than any other?

And why should anyone even try to debunk you scripturally? You forgot to show that your scripture is correct in the first place.

Dear SZ, I prefer the KJV since it allows access to the original words written. I have already shown that ONLY God could have possibly written Genesis and NO one, including yourself, has been able to refute me. Want to try again? I doubt it since you've already shown that you are a better runner than a refuter. Good to see you again and God Bless you, old buddy, old pal.

In Love,
Aman

 

[bhsmte]

Dear SZ, I prefer the KJV since it allows access to the original words written. I have already shown that ONLY God could have possibly written Genesis and NO one, including yourself, has been able to refute me. Want to try again? I doubt it since you've already shown that you are a better runner than a refuter. Good to see you again and God Bless you, old buddy, old pal.

In Love,
Aman

You have shown us quite a bit Aman, no question.