Eternal Security

OzSpen

Regular Member
Oct 15, 2005
11,541
707
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
Visit site
✟125,343.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
Dean,

In your response to John 15:6, you stated:
The difference in opinion seems to arise out of the understanding of the word "abide".​
The difference is not in the etymological meaning of the word 'abide', but your and my understanding of the Greek present tense in that language that indicates continuous action.

Oz
 
Upvote 0

OzSpen

Regular Member
Oct 15, 2005
11,541
707
Brisbane, Qld., Australia
Visit site
✟125,343.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
How lovely it would be if all Christians would have unity...
Do you really expect unity in

  • eternal punishment vs annihilation?
  • Arminianism vs Calvinism on predestination, eternal security, free will?
Is there a possibility of expecting unity while acknowledging the differences? I think there is the possibility for that kind of unity, as long as the differences don't alter the core of the Gospel message and essential theology (eg deity of Christ, the Trinity, salvation through Christ alone, etc).

I have been active in not agreeing with some aspects of Calvinism, but I'm convinced Arminians and Calvinists can have unity on the core issues I mentioned. If we expect total agreement on all aspects of theology between Calvinists and Arminians, I cannot see that happening.

What do you think, Kayla?

In Christ, Oz
 
Upvote 0

Jere209

Legend
Jul 24, 2007
21,474
2,490
Being propped up by His hands
✟40,793.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Ahem...
MOD HAT ON

This thread has undergone a minor cleaning due to the violation of one of our rules. It is ok to discuss different views, but please refrain from violating the following rule:
Flaming and Harassment
● Do not insult, belittle, mock, goad, personally attack, threaten, harass, or use derogatory nicknames in reference to other members or groups of members. Address the context of the post, not the poster.
● If you are flamed, do not respond in-kind. Alert staff to the situation by utilizing the report button. Do not report another member out of spite.
● Do not state or imply that another member or group of members who have identified themselves as Christian are not Christian.
● Those who do not adhere to the Statement of Faith are welcome as members and participants in discussions, but you are required to respect these beliefs, even if you do not share them.
● Do not make another member's experience on this site miserable. This includes, making false accusations or persistently attacking them in the open forums.
● Respect another member's request to cease personal contact.

Please continue in the Spirit of unity, and happy posting :)

MOD HAT OFF
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,183
2,677
61
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟100,334.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Dean,

In your response to John 15:6, you stated:

The difference is not in the etymological meaning of the word 'abide', but your and my understanding of the Greek present tense in that language that indicates continuous action.

Oz

Whatever dude.

I know that present tense indicates those "believing" currently.

the present tense denotes action taking place or going on in the present time.

Whatever dude.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0

DeaconDean

γέγονα χαλκὸς, κύμβαλον ἀλαλάζον
Jul 19, 2005
22,183
2,677
61
Gastonia N.C. (Piedmont of N.C.)
✟100,334.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Dean,

In your response to John 15:6, you stated:

The difference is not in the etymological meaning of the word 'abide', but your and my understanding of the Greek present tense in that language that indicates continuous action.

Oz

And again, you ignore what I posted earlier.

Let me refresh your memory:

Also, you might also want to refresh yourself with K-I-T-T-E-L, (did I spell it correct enough for you, ya'll know how us southern redneck hillbillies er) Volume IV, page 576.


By the use of "menien" Jn. seeks to express the immutability and inviolability of the relation of immenance...Thus God abides in Christ (14:10. Believers abide in Christ 6:56; 15:4-7; 1 Jn. 2:6, 27f; 3:6, 24) and Christ in them (Jn. 15:4-7; 1 Jn. 3:24. God abides in believers (1 Jn. 4:16), and believers in God ( 1 Jn. 2:24; 4:16)...After the anology of the personal statement Jn. uses "menein en" for the abiding of the life, 1 Jn. 3:15; love, 1 Jn. 3:17; truth, 2 Jn. 2; anointing, 1 Jn. 2:27. Believers abide in divine things, e.g., God's Word in Jn. 5:38; love, Jn. 15:9, 10; light, 1 Jn. 2:10; doctrine, 2 Jn. 9. Here again the relationship of salvation is both enduring and present.

There is nothing there that agrees with the stuff you said.

God Bless

Till all are one.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums