I acknowledge the fact that it is based off of a pagan holiday, due to the expansion of the Christian faith.
I still celebrate it, due to the enigma that is Jesus Christ's actual birth day.
The Syriac bishop Jacob bar-Salibi wrote in the 12th century:
The day is called
Dies Natalis Sol Invicti. That said, what occurred in the early Church was on celebrating the Person/Work and Birth of Messiah--and anything else done in remembrance of him....or done to counter the focus of pagan worship by making times of Christian worship on the same days as pagans so focus would be upon the Lord...all of that is fine, IMHO.
In regards to Jacob bar-Salibi's thoughts, what he imagined was that, during the last years of paganism, the cult of Sol remained so popular that the Church Fathers could only neutralize its celebration on the traditional winter solstice of December 25th by setting the birthday of Christ on that very same day. Essentially, they took a day away used to worship a false god--and with the institutionalization of Christianity and the councils being called together to choose a day for celebration (as they wanted to find ways to make Christiantiy prominent), they chose a day where everyone was naturally prepared for worshipping someone other than Christ--with the goal being that Christ would take precedience in the eyes of the state....and in their views, sooner rather than later, Christ trumped Sol.
All of this becomes even more relevant in light of how everything prior to the era of Christianity being dominant involved believers being on the margins and severely perseucted/killed continually. They had little options and were often trying to survive, be it Jewish believers or Gentile. When they were finally able to have a significant platform, they took advantage of it....
In many ways, what occurred is similar to the invention of the internet/radio by those in the world---with it being used to spread ideologies counter to the mind of the Lord--and believers who have throughout the centuries sought to make it possible for believers to have a voice/domiance in certain areas rather than allowing those who are unsaved to only hear the perspectives of unbelievers. There's nothing in the scriptures commanding believers to utilize media outlets, or to take holidays made by the state/use them for their own reflection upon the Messiah--but believers, if being given increased rights/power and having the opportunity, are commanded by the Lord to make the most of anything they can in order to present the Gospel message to others (I Corinthians 9, 1 Corinthians 16:8-10, 2 Corinthians 2:11-13, Ephesians 5:15-17, Colossians 4:2-6, etc).
As another believer said best on the issue of what the Church Fathers did:
As for Christmas superseding a pagan festival, well, good! Grace builds upon nature. Why make a change in people's traditions, more in the nature of a cypher (the undifferentiated, holiday 'slot') than a significant change, more radical than necessary? The antipathetic nature of the festivals is what was significant, not the reuse of an established 'slot'.
Furthermore, given that in olden times, post Constantine, at least, Christianity tended to be imposed by rulers, it seems to have been an eminently prudent measure. The 'slot' was henceforth occupied by the majority's religion, and its continued use as a pagan holiday would have been rendered more problematic to the latter's vestigial adherents.
For anyone saying "But Christ wasn't born on the day we celebrate during the Holiday!!!!!", having the actual date (possibly in October or even during the Summer in July, IMHO) doesn't mean that it's wrong to celebrate an event apart from that. Technically, celebration for the birth of Christ should occur ALL THROUGHOUT the year anyhow, even though he wasn't born in every month--so the fact that one was chosen to do so should not trip people out. Either one values it/ wishes to celebrate it whenever they can, with freedom given to others to focus on it during a set-apart time---or one doesn't value it and wishes not to celebrate it.
With the date issue, there is no doubt that Constantine started the church celebrating certain events during pagan holidays...for it was apart of his desire to establish more order in the church/have things unified when Christianity became legalized/the state religion and he wanted things to have already existing associations with holidays that were celebrated by the rest of the Romans. For him, having a holiday celebrated where dedication to a pagan god used to occur would be difficult to get rid of if a new holiday was instituted and people still were familar with the former days when events would be celebrated...so in institutionalizng Christianity, he called for the churches to come together in councils and choose the days when events were to go down.
Saturn was honored with a winter solace festival." Saturnus (Sun/Moon) was worshiped December 17-24..but the early church chose December 25th to counter the false god worship with true god worship. Because no one really knows the exact date of Christ's birth, a date was strategically selected after the winter solace to counter the pagan worship of Saturn. Additionally, choosing to celebrate the birth of the Messiah would be something that was an issue since celebrating the birth of Christ predates Constantines rule. There is evidence that Christ's birth was celebrated in 200 ad in the 8th year of Augustus, to my knowledge.
And for people saying it's idolatry to celebrate CHrist on a day (or season) where others celebrate worship to pagan God, I'd say that it's an issue that they need to get over. Not only do they NOT know the exact day He was born--but trying to discuss "pagan" roots of days is inconsistent since anyone studying the days/weeks of the year understands that EVERDAY we live has a pagan association with it.
As
one source said:
The days of the week were named after Norse gods and giant objects in the sky.
These names come to us originally from the Greeks and Romans, who named the days of the week after their gods.
The Anglo-Saxons, who invaded Britain hundreds of years ago, adopted this idea but substituted their own gods. The English language has inherited and changed those names a bit, but the ones we use today resemble those names.
Here's how:
- Sunday: Sun's Day. The Sun gave people light and warmth every day. They decided to name the first (or last) day of the week after the Sun.
- Monday: Moon's Day. The Moon was thought to be very important in the lives of people and their crops.
- Tuesday: Tiw's Day. Tiw, or Tyr, was a Norse god known for his sense of justice.
- Wednesday: Woden's Day. Woden, or Odin, was a Norse god who was one of the most powerful of them all.
- Thursday: Thor's Day. Thor was a Norse god who wielded a giant hammer.
- Friday: Frigg's Day. Frigg was a Norse god equal in power to Odin.
- Saturday: Seater's Day or Saturn's Day. Saturn was a Roman god.
The same dynamics have occurred even for the months themselves.
As said best in another resource:
The original Roman year had 10 named months Martius "March", Aprilis "April", Maius "May", Junius "June", Quintilis "July", Sextilis "August", September "September", October "October", November "November", December "December".
- January: Janus is the Roman god of gates and doorways, depicted with two faces looking in opposite directions. His festival month in January.
- February: Februa is the Roman festival of purification, held on February fifteenth. It is possibly of Sabine origin.
- March: Martius was the time for the resumption of war. Mars is the Roman god of war. He is identified with the Greek god Ares.
- April: Aprilis is the month of Aphrodite the Greek goddess of love and beauty. She is identified with the Roman goddess Venus.
- May: Maia (meaning "the great one") is the Italic goddess of spring, the daughter of Faunus, and wife of Vulcan.
- June: Junius or Juno is the principle goddess of the Roman Pantheon. She is the goddess of marriage and the well-being of women. She is the wife and sister of Jupiter. She is ientified with the Greek goddess Hera.
- July: After the first Roman Emperor Julius Caesr (100-44 B.C.), who was regarded as a God.
- August: After the second great Roman Emperor Augustus Caesar (63 B.C.-14 A.D.), who like all Emperors up until Constantine (274-337 A.D., the first Christian Emperor) was also regarded as a God.
Even the word we use to name our very planet has some very strong connections with paganism. For the word "Earth" comes from the Old English word 'eorthe', which refers to the region that came between the world of the gods and the underworld. It is just the word English-speaking people use. When the planets were named for the Roman gods, Earth was known as 'Terra.' This was the name of the Mother goddess, equivalent of the Greek Gaia or 'Ge.' Indeed in many languages the word for 'Earth' is 'Terra' or a variant of this Latin word. That's where why we describe aliens as 'extraterrestrials.'"
To be more specific, the days of the week are all associated with thingse deemed "pagan" ..as Saturday (when Jews have Sabbath ), for example, is named after the god of Saturn in the Roman empire..and the same thing with other days as well.
ALL of that is said in light of the issue of how much there does seem to be focus upon worshipping the Lord and celebrating the birth of Christ during one day because people want no assocation with that which is "pagan" ...for it makes, IMHO, no logical sense to focus upon that...and then simultaneously claim we should worship/celebrate the Messiah in His work throughout the year since nearly every day/month will have a pagan association
There are differing views on the subject of Christmas/the action of choosing the day of the 25th to celebrate the birth of the Messiah, of course...and for some excellent reviews on the issue,
one can go online/investigate under the following titles:
Additionally, there was actually an excellent review on the issue of trying to decide when the actual date of Christ's birth was...and why the church choo celebrate it on December 25th. For more, one can go online/look up the article entitled
"How December 25 Became Christmas - Biblical Archeology Review " (). IMHO, I think it was a well-balanced article that contains surprises for people of varying opinions about Christmas and December 25th. IMHO, I think it's the most definitive article I have yet seen on the historical basis for December 25 as the day of Jesus’ birth. The article can definitely serve to quell a great deal of the paganoid rhetoric we see out there this time of year..and yet, at the same time, it does help in showing how Christmas on December 25 was not God’s original intention, and it was established as an observance long after the Apostles were gone. Came across it after studying the Christmas series that Messianic Derek Lemnan did if going online/looking up something under the name of
"Christmas | Messianic Musings".
No one knows for sure when Jesus was born..for there are calculations that place His Birth in the Winter or the Spring or the Fall. Ultimately, no one really knows for sure. If one chooses to celebrate it in the Fall, Spring, or the Winter makes no difference. For it's not the when that we're celebrating; it's the Who and the Why that we're celebrating..and the majority of the Body of Christ chooses to celebrate the Birth of Christ in December because that is the time when the whole world is paying attention. The Gospel is freely preached through song at this time of year like no other time in many respects...