Yes, the purpose being to hold another bond hearing at which time bond will likely be set higher.You know there isn't.
But! It was enough for the judge to revoke bond, wasn't it?
Upvote
0
Yes, the purpose being to hold another bond hearing at which time bond will likely be set higher.You know there isn't.
But! It was enough for the judge to revoke bond, wasn't it?
You know there isn't.
But! It was enough for the judge to revoke bond, wasn't it?
Or in other words to evade, avoid, dodge, duck, elude, eschew, escape, finesse, get around, scape, shake, shirk, shuffle (out of), shun, weasel (out of).You tell the entire truth, but only in response to a question
No, I mean exactly what I said. You are only required to respond to the questions askedOr in other words to evade, avoid, dodge, duck, elude, eschew, escape, finesse, get around, scape, shake, shirk, shuffle (out of), shun, weasel (out of).
LOL ... seems to go in cycles. That was true in the 1970's, too.I want to go on record saying that it warms my heart to see some of my liberal friends take such a strong stance against perjury as opposed to how it was viewed in the 90's
Zimmerman now perjured himself? That's a strong statement coming from a defender of the man.I want to go on record saying that it warms my heart to see some of my liberal friends take such a strong stance against perjury as opposed to how it was viewed in the 90's
We call that a MayTag quality spinZimmerman now perjured himself? That's a strong statement coming from a defender of the man.
I love how the truth comes out!
What exactly is the truth in what you posted, Ben?Zimmerman now perjured himself? That's a strong statement coming from a defender of the man.
I love how the truth comes out!
How this now turned into a discussion about perjury. It's known as a flow of conversation.What exactly is the truth in what you posted, Ben?
How this now turned into a discussion about perjury. It's known as a flow of conversation.
How this now turned into a discussion about perjury. It's known as a flow of conversation.
Go on record? What is this, Law and Order? There's no 'record', Mach. This is a bunch of strangers having a conversation with each other. If someone is keeping a 'record', well... that's pretty sad.I want to go on record saying that it warms my heart to see some of my liberal friends take such a strong stance against perjury as opposed to how it was viewed in the 90's
Sorry if the colloquialism I used was one with which you are not familiarGo on record? What is this, Law and Order? There's no 'record', Mach. This is a bunch of strangers having a conversation with each other. If someone is keeping a 'record', well... that's pretty sad.
Can you point us to the lie that Zimmerman actually told?It makes sense when the thread is about Zim passing a lie detector test and is now back in prison because of a lie to the courts about how much money the Zims had.
The irony is thick.
You made a statement/question about perjury.How this now turned into a discussion about perjury. It's known as a flow of conversation.
This will help you.Sorry if the colloquialism I used was one with which you are not familiar
Can you point us to the lie that Zimmerman actually told?
Really? Let's review exactly what you saidI never said GeoZim lied.
And yet there he is, sitting in prison because he and his wife lied about the money.