Zimmerman Passed Lie Detector Test

[MachZer0]

You evade my question.

Since you are much more familiar with the case all I ask that you proffer is what the judge said in revoking bond. Simple request, simple answer.

Yes I do, and here's the quote:

"It is apparent that [Shellie] Zimmerman testified untruthfully at the bond hearing," the judge writes in his order. "The Defendant also testified, but did not alert the Court to the misinformation."

In other words, Zimmerman told no lie, he just didn't alert the court to misinformation.

 

[MachZer0]

No, he's just had his bond revoked because of his role in trying to conceal his assets. There's no need to pile on another charge. His wife is a different matter because she had no charges, so a perjury charge was the only way to punish her directly. She will have her day in court unless she pleads to it.

In other words, he didn't get charged with perjury because he didn't commit perjury.

 

[AirPo]

Yes I do, and here's the quote:

"It is apparent that [Shellie] Zimmerman testified untruthfully at the bond hearing," the judge writes in his order. "The Defendant also testified, but did not alert the Court to the misinformation."

In other words, Zimmerman told no lie, he just didn't alert the court to misinformation.

Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

 

[Alexb]

Zim is an accessory to perjury.

I find it amusing that people are trying to defend Zim on this issue! I understand defending the murder rap, although this one is an open and shut case. Some have passed the point of being a Zim defender to being a Zimbot.

 

[MachZer0]

Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

So if you disagree with the judge's assessment, point us to the perjury. Explain to us why the prosecutor didn't file charges. Recall as well that he is not required to answer questions that are not asked

 

[MachZer0]

Zim is an accessory to perjury.

First time I've ever heard of that. I believe the actual crime would be called suborning perjury. Please provide evidence of such

I find it amusing that people are trying to defend Zim on this issue! I understand defending the murder rap, although this one is an open and shut case. Some have passed the point of being a Zim defender to being a Zimbot.

He's being defended because it was thrown in here as a red herring to distract from the results of his lie detector test, which indicate that he broke no law and had every right to defend himself against Trayvon Martin

 

[stamperben]

Yes I do, and here's the quote:

"It is apparent that [Shellie] Zimmerman testified untruthfully at the bond hearing," the judge writes in his order. "The Defendant also testified, but did not alert the Court to the misinformation."

In other words, Zimmerman told no lie, he just didn't alert the court to misinformation.

I'll let you look up the term "lying by omission" on your own.

 

[MachZer0]

I'll let you look up the term "lying by omission" on your own.

Is there a crime on the books called lying by omission?

 

[NightHawkeye]

I'll let you look up the term "lying by omission" on your own.

Are you confusing this with "sins of omission"?

Which contrasts with "sins of commission".

 

[athenken]

I'll let you look up the term "lying by omission" on your own.

I learned long ago to only answer the questions that are asked and the scope they were asked. Just because the prosecution did not ask a question like "What funds do you have access to and where did it come from?" then they have nothing to stand on. It is incumbent on the prosecution to pull out all the information to support their case. The defendent does not have a duty to shoot himself in the foot.

 

[stamperben]

I learned long ago to only answer the questions that are asked and the scope they were asked. Just because the prosecution did not ask a question like "What funds do you have access to and where did it come from?" then they have nothing to stand on. It is incumbent on the prosecution to pull out all the information to support their case. The defendent does not have a duty to shoot himself in the foot.

In other words to lie by omission. And yes, I can see how that would be in his or your best interest.

 

[Alexb]

The defendent does not have a duty to shoot himself in the foot.

That is what his wife was for.

 

[MachZer0]

In other words to lie by omission. And yes, I can see how that would be in his or your best interest.

Still waiting for your answer. Is there a crime called lying by omission

 

[athenken]

In other words to lie by omission. And yes, I can see how that would be in his or your best interest.

Have you ever been in a position where you were either being audited or being deposed? It behooves you to only answer the questions that were asked unless instructed to do otherwise.

 

[Touma]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omission_(criminal_law)

Failure to act upon a duty or responsibility. It is your duty to tell the entire truth while under oath. With holding information while under oath is going against your legal duty and responsibility.

 

[athenken]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omission_(criminal_law)

Failure to act upon a duty or responsibility. It is your duty to tell the entire truth while under oath. With holding information while under oath is going against your legal duty and responsibility.

Granted, though this only speaks to proving information that is directly relavent to the question that was asked. It does say you are also supposed to go on telling your whole life story just because you are a long-winded person.

 

[MachZer0]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Omission_(criminal_law)

Failure to act upon a duty or responsibility. It is your duty to tell the entire truth while under oath. With holding information while under oath is going against your legal duty and responsibility.

You tell the entire truth, but only in response to a question

 

[kermit]

Is there a crime on the books called lying by omission?

Yes, it's called violating the oath when you take the stand to state the whole truth.

 

[stamperben]

Still waiting for your answer. Is there a crime called lying by omission

You know there isn't.
But! It was enough for the judge to revoke bond, wasn't it?

 

[MachZer0]

Yes, it's called violating the oath when you take the stand to state the whole truth.

And what question was he asked on the stand wherein he didn't tell the whole truth?