see I don't even like the PBS cartoon "dragon tales" because it portrays dragons as good. its all part of the conditioning, and from many posters it seems to be working good is evil and evil is good
Exactly.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
see I don't even like the PBS cartoon "dragon tales" because it portrays dragons as good. its all part of the conditioning, and from many posters it seems to be working good is evil and evil is good
I'd conclude that Peter took good care of his wife, while she lived in a pumpkin, probably liked eating pumpkin as well as her husband Peter, nice to see marriage still alive in childrens stories instead of just hooking up. you will have to go farther in this nursery rhyme for me to make any judgements as to why he had to keep her in a pumpkin. It may just be they were out of watermellons
I guess I think of that rhyme a little differently. Not quite so sweet. Peter couldn't keep his wife at home, but after he hid her in the pumpkin, she stayed home every night. My version is not for the kids.
Here's another rhyme which is quite similar.
Ice cream, penny a lump, The more you eat the more you jump. Eeper Weeper, chimbly sweeper, Had a wife but couldn't keep her. Had another, didn't love her, Up the chimbly he did shove her.
Hi RETS. I'm a little curious about something, so I'm hoping that you don't mind me asking you the following questions. I just finished reading your personal testimony on another thread which included the following comments:
Unless I'm misreading you or have accidentally pulled your second quote out of its intended context, it sounds as if you just testified how "far more damaging" involvement with such things as a "vampiric cult" and "every aspect of magick and sorcery possible" were to you than any possible drug use you could have gotten involved in. IF this is the case, THEN why would you tell somebody to "enjoy the movies", movies which glorify these exact things, unless the Holy Spirit specifically tells them to do something else? Would the Holy Spirit EVER find such things to be "enjoyable"? Is God a respecter of persons? Would you mind elaborating on this a bit? Of course, you don't have to, but I'm a little curious as to how I'm supposed to reconcile your two different quotes. I'm NOT accusing of you of being deceitful in either quote...I'm just having a hard time finding the harmony between the two and was hoping that you could help. Thanks.
"Harry Potter starts to get everybody curious about the mystic inside of them," says Potter, a fan of J.K. Rowling's bestselling series. "I think it stirs a yearning in people to know more than just the five senses."
Who here do you know of that mutters spellsBut Harry Potter stories glorify and present as entertainment the saying of incantations, the muttering of spells, and Scripture says we are not to mutter incantations/spells, that this is sinful.
Who here do you know of that mutters spells
RETS said:If another person enjoys the movies, I'm going to encourage them to continue doing so, UNLESS the Holy Spirit says differently. Why? Because though God is no respecter of persons, He is concerned with our well being. If you are weak in an area I am strong, He will impress upon you to avoid contact with this area. As I do not know you, or anyone, as well as the Holy Spirit does, I leave it to Him to lead you in the way YOU should go, according to what is best for your life.
As I've said before, in my particular case (and seemingly in the case of others who have posted here), it has absolutely nothing to do with "being weak in an area". Rather, as both I and others have explained, it has to do with what is ABOMINABLE TO THE LORD. At my end, I feel no need to further the discussion along these lines. I've said what I felt needed to be said and I also heard the rebuttals of others. This conversation is going nowhere and has become the exact type of waste of time that I try to avoid.
Anyhow, thank you for taking the time to answer my questions...even though I have a hard time believing one aspect of your answer.
Who here do you know of that lusts in his/her heart? Or nurses resentment or greed?
Whether or not fiction realistically depicts something is one issue.
Whether or not fiction tends to lead people to do something is another issue.
Whether or not fiction blurs lines that should not be blurred is another issue.
Whether or not fiction glorifies something that is sinful is another issue.
Whether or not fiction makes entertainment out of something that God hates is another issue.
Ok, so while Harry Potter does incantations, people say they aren't realistic incantations, and that they aren't tempted to do incantations because of exposure to Harry Potter.
But Harry Potter stories glorify and present as entertainment the saying of incantations, the muttering of spells, and Scripture says we are not to mutter incantations/spells, that this is sinful.
RETS said:One aspect? And what is that? I may not have clarified enough- That's one of my weaknesses.
RETS said:As for the conversation going nowhere, this is what is to be expected when one comes on strong from their personal conviction, and that conviction meets and clashes with the conviction of another. Such eventuality should be expected and anticipated.
Why not do us a favor and point 'em out to usWho here do you know of that lusts in his/her heart? Or nurses resentment or greed?
It has nothing to do with lack of clarification. I'll leave it at that.
By "waste of time", I wasn't referring to anything "unexpected" or "not anticipated". I believe in planting and/or watering and then leaving it to God for the increase. IOW, I'm not going to try to force anyone into changing their mind or opinion. Sorry if I didn't make that clear.
wow you mean harry potter isnt a true story? I thought it was a documentary..lol
No worries mate.wow you mean harry potter isnt a true story? I thought it was a documentary..lol
Location: Australia
So- Because I theoretically have lust in my heart (taking off the first suggestion), I must also mutter spells?
Interesting insinuation there.
And a very big issue, at that. Were any of the spells real, I would have nothing to do with it, and be joining you on that side of the issue.
As does Tolkien and Lewis- So why don't we avoid all possible accusation of holding a double standard and condemn them all?
Who here do you know of that lusts in his/her heart? Or nurses resentment or greed?