• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Why are atheists considered to be so dishonest?

razeontherock

Well-Known Member
May 24, 2010
26,546
1,480
WI
✟35,597.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
That's still imposing His will onto us.

I don't see how it's obvious. If God wants free choice He probably shouldn't attach eternal rewards and punishments to "loving" Him or not.

Your use of quotes shows that you truly don't get it. He does not impose His will, not during this life. Neither has He rescinded His ability to snuff us out, nor to Judge us. 'The Holy Ghost is a gentleman' is a turn of phrase it would do you well to familiarize yourself with!
 
Upvote 0

ephraimanesti

Senior Veteran
Nov 22, 2005
5,702
390
82
Seattle, WA
✟30,671.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
I assume some can be dishonest, just as I see alot of Christians lying for Jesus, too.

Personally, I'm always honest, in fact, it's been noted as a bad thing. I'm often honest to the point of brutality, and I don't know when to shut up. On halloween, at a party, I was brutally honest to my friends and angered alot of them. I didn't see the problem, since I thought I was just telling the truth, but apparently, some things are better left unsaid.
MY BROTHER,

Anyone who, as you say, "lies for Jesus" is seriously misguided and is probably lying for their personal benefit. Jesus represents God's ultimate TRUTH, and to lie for any reason connected with a God who IS Truth is a very strange idea indeed.

Nothing of Eternal importance can be characterized as "better left unsaid" considering silence could result in the eternal loss of a misguided soul.

:bow:ABBA'S FOOL,
ephraim
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
MY DEAR FRIEND,

Well, it is true that DENIAL can pertain to both spiritual and unspiritual viewpoints vis-a-vis the opposing viewpoint, for a Christian, whose "christianness" stems from a personal face-to-face relationship with God, this would involve a state of mental illness where one fantasizes an "invisible friend" residing in their heart with whom they have a running conversation through the day. It is one thing of DENY into non-existence something that another holds to exist, but it is quite another to DENY into existence something that does not exist.

In other words, you would have to say that Christians are are mentally ill due to their person interaction with and Entity Who does not exist. Is that your point?

No my point is that you do not accuse these people of being dishonest. Nor, for that matter, Jews who deny that Jesus is the Messiah, or Muslims who deny that Jesus is God, nor Scientologists who deny that God even exists. You would have to also accuse these people of being in denial, however, only atheists get the distinction of being inherently dishonest.

It has been obvious since the beginning of time--the existence of religions seeking this "Ultimate Truth" stem back to the very beginning. Mankind is hardwired by its Creator to seek out said Creator.

People have been seeking the truth since beginning. However, we have nothing resembling agreement as to what that truth is. I don't see how we can claim that anything about it is "obvious." You may feel it's obvious, but you can't explain to me why it's obvious.

Put another way by St. Paul, "What may be known about God is plain to all, because God has made it plain to them. For since the creation of the world God's invisible qualities--His eternal power and divine nature--have been clearly seen, being understood from what has been made, so that men are without excuse. For although they knew God, they neither glorified Him as God nor gave thanks to Him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools." (Romans 1:19-21)

I'm sorry to disagree with St. Paul, but where do we see God's divine nature, or eternal power? I honestly don't see it. I'm going to assume that claiming that God's invisible qualities can be clearly seen lost something in the translation.

Think of it this way--IF GOD DID NOT, IN FACT EXIST, THERE WOULD BE NO ATHEISTS BECAUSE THERE WOULD BE NOTHING TO DENY BELIEVING IN.

I also deny that Elvis is still alive, and that leprechauns exist. By your reasoning, this is proof that Elvis is still alive, and that there are leprechauns. This reasoning is poor to say the least.

Because if something is true it should be considered and accepted; if something is NOT true, it should be ignored and duck-backed.

Right, and the fact that Christians seem to consider, and accept as truth that atheists are inherently dishonest, is insulting to me, personally.

What's the point of getting upset either way--either the person who spoke the word was trying to be helpful or he was a fool.

In what way would they have been helpful? And it's not one person, it's a whole big group of them.

Why do atheists/agnostics INSIST on blaming God for all the multitude of horrors in which our world abounds--when these horrors are perpetrated by human beings and their very existence is ample evidence of the deadly fruits of humans turning their backs on God and His Love? Far from being any "proof" that there is no God, it is ample proof that God exists but has been disdained and ignored--and the victims are paying the horrible price.

My Brother. at least consider this: The greatest horrors in the 20th Century--millions upon millions of our brothers and sisters brutalized and slaughtered--were perpetrated by atheistic societies. How can God be held responsible?

I don't think the blame is placed on God for causing these things to happen, but as an omnipotent, all-powerful being who supposedly loves us, God allows them to happen.

I don't agree with that reasoning, but I at least understand it. As such, I cannot hold such a God responsible.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Your use of quotes shows that you truly don't get it.

No, honestly, I do not.

He does not impose His will, not during this life.

This would be true, if God had not told us what would happen in the next lifetime if we do not "love" Him, or what rewards we get if we do. However, He has, and all regards to free-choice is gone.

Neither has He rescinded His ability to snuff us out, nor to Judge us. 'The Holy Ghost is a gentleman' is a turn of phrase it would do you well to familiarize yourself with!

Okay. But just claiming that the Holy Ghost is a gentleman does not convince me of it. Just saying that I don't get "it" does not explain "it" to me.

Here's how I see it:

Let's say I have a chili-dog shop, and offer a dog to someone with the conditions that I will reward them with $1000 if they endorse my hotdog shop saying that my dogs are delicious, or I will punish them by beating them senseless if they don't. I think most people would take the money, and endorse my shop regardless of whether my hotdogs were delicious, or tasted like garbage. This is not a choice that was freely made, it was one made out of coercion, birbery, and manipulation. It is imposing your will onto someone else. Not only that, but I think it's fair to say that the claims made about how great the hotdogs are, are suspect.

If God really wants me to make a free choice, He cannot tell me that he's going to give me $1000, or beat me senseless depending on whether or not I tell Him His chili-dogs are delicious before I make my choice. Of course, He can give me $1000, or beat me senseless, if that's what He chooses to do once I have made my decision, and it will still be an honest, freely-chosen decision.

This is, honestly, how I see it. Do you understand why I see it this way? Is it a dishonest assessment in some way, and if so, why? Is there another way to view the problem? What is the "it" that I don't get?
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
That's still imposing His will onto us.
Actually, the imposing of will begins with the sinner. Sin is defined as that which is harmful, primarily to others and not-so-primarily but still of some concern to God, harmful to ourselves. God's rules of holiness are to emphasize the importance of respect for others and ourselves, and it is through sin that one's will becomes imposed. As long as we are behaving in a holy/respectful way to others/God/ourselves, there is no need for God to be offended, but as we know that's pretty tough to maintain without fault.

I think if you really want to consider what God might possibly do about sinners, you could come to agree that they should be removed from the world (death). Though it doesn't happen the very moment they sin, it happens. Of course, there is such a thing as forgiveness, if you feel that you're so sick of sin that you'd like to be forgiven and blessed for striving for holiness instead of cursed for striving for evil, the offer is there.
I don't see how it's obvious. If God wants free choice He probably shouldn't attach eternal rewards and punishments to "loving" Him or not.
Loving Him is the result of accepting Him. You can resist Him and insist on disobeying Him, but you won't get the last word. You don't have to be such a clever person to realize that God loves good and hates evil.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Actually, the imposing of will begins with the sinner. Sin is defined as that which is harmful, primarily to others and not-so-primarily but still of some concern to God, harmful to ourselves. God's rules of holiness are to emphasize the importance of respect for others and ourselves, and it is through sin that one's will becomes imposed.

Okay. This doesn't mean that God is not manipulating us with reward and punishment in order to get us to act a certain way. It does not mean that God is offering us a free-choice to come to Him, or to treat others with respect. It does mean that He has to bribe/threaten us to do so.

As long as we are behaving in a holy/respectful way to others/God/ourselves, there is no need for God to be offended, but as we know that's pretty tough to maintain without fault.

I think if you really want to consider what God might possibly do about sinners, you could come to agree that they should be removed from the world (death). Though it doesn't happen the very moment they sin, it happens.

Isn't it safe to say that sinners will be "removed from the world" regardless?

Of course, there is such a thing as forgiveness, if you feel that you're so sick of sin that you'd like to be forgiven and blessed for striving for holiness instead of cursed for striving for evil, the offer is there.

Why isn't striving to do good for the sake of doing good enough? Why isn't trying to avoid hurting others a direct result of respecting them? Why should I require special blessings, and avoidance of curses, in order to respect other people?

Loving Him is the result of accepting Him. You can resist Him and insist on disobeying Him, but you won't get the last word. You don't have to be such a clever person to realize that God loves good and hates evil.

But this is just the same argument. I'm not being told to choose between loving God or not, I'm being told to choose between reward and punishment. If I'm going to have respect for my fellow human beings, it's going to be because I genuinely respect them, not because God is going to reward me for doing so, or punish me if I don't. That would not be genuine love for God, or respect for others, that's just looking out for myself.

This is what I mean by honesty. I can't say that I honestly believe if I'm really just hedging my bets to receive rewards. It wouldn't be honest to myself most of all, or a God who really does exist. If I'm going to believe, it has to be without promise of reward, or fear of punishment.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

RiseAgain

Junior Member
Oct 13, 2006
36
1
✟22,667.00
Faith
Christian
Why are atheists considered to be so dishonest?

Who say's they are ? Every one born on this planet has the same problem ( we call it sin ) the only difference is Jesus died to cover our ( past, future, present ) sin.. we all still sin..you ..me.. and every one between.. That is why God gave us the Cross, with one man to pay the price.. and Thanks God he did.. for we can do nothing in our own to make it to heaven.. but ask Jesus in to our heart, that is all God asks of us.. he made the door to heaven very easy.. what more would you have him do ?
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Okay. This doesn't mean that God is not manipulating us with reward and punishment in order to get us to act a certain way. It does not mean that God is offering us a free-choice to come to Him, or to treat others with respect. It does mean that He has to bribe/threaten us to do so.
Well I think it is a matter of perspective. If you feel like His expectations aren't reasonable then obviously you'll argue with them. For me I don't have any problem with what God expects of me, I'm most willing to change according to the way He shows me I need to because it is all for good reason. I think the hardest thing for a non-believer is to purely accept that God's reasons are perfect.
Isn't it safe to say that sinners will be "removed from the world" regardless?
Regardless of what? Perfection? That's what the whole story of the Bible tells us, unless we are perfect we are doomed to death because that is the ultimate justice for the wrong we have contributed to the world. As you ought well know, the only person who was ever perfect is Christ, so He never deserved to die and this is why God raised Him after He was murdered by those who envied Him.
Why isn't striving to do good for the sake of doing good enough? Why isn't trying to avoid hurting others a direct result of respecting them? Why should I require special blessings, and avoidance of curses, in order to respect other people?
Well I'm not saying it isn't, but what I do say about it is that if you don't understand and accept God's definition of "good" then you'll not be able to quite impress Him enough by simply living up to your own definition of good. In order to be righteous in God's eyes, you must learn what He expects of you, and only then you may feel content that your best efforts to please Him will suffice.
But this is just the same argument. I'm not being told to choose between loving God or not, I'm being told to choose between reward and punishment. If I'm going to have respect for my fellow human beings, it's going to be because I genuinely respect them, not because God is going to reward me for doing so, or punish me if I don't. That would not be genuine love for God, or respect for others, that's just looking out for myself.
That's exactly right, and that is why those who are more predisposed to evil will be much less inclined to behave Christ-like due to their nature. I would say that you've got a much easier path to salvation than someone who has committed murder, since you're more or less a reflection of the respectful person God admires. Do be wary of pride though, if you esteem yourself too highly you may not be able to see how highly you ought esteem God. So if you think you're a good enough person with a genuine motive to please God, but not yet Christian, you've obviously got some grudge against what God has told you in the Bible and that is what you ought to address instead of arguing about His methods of justice. It's clear that everyone who has established a healthy relationship with God is quite comfortable with His methods of justice - so who is it that has the greater problem, God or the one who doesn't agree with Him?
This is what I mean by honesty. I can't say that I honestly believe if I'm really just hedging my bets to receive rewards. It wouldn't be honest to myself most of all, or a God who really does exist. If I'm going to believe, it has to be without promise of reward, or fear of punishment.
I tend to agree with this statement, a belief based upon an expectation of getting something from God is only superfluous. The only truly valuable relationship is one of pure love and respect, acknowledging God for the creator and supreme king He is, and committing yourself without restraint to all that is good and pleasing to Him.

Further to this, God has already given us what He chose to give us, and the devil has attempted to take that away. For those of us in His garden who grow to become the vine of Christ, He has promised to restore the original gift He gave (everlasting life without sin), but we must choose this very life/day/hour who we are going to believe. You're either for Christ or antichrist, it's a pretty clear decision we have to make and the more you push it away the further you have to go to get it back again.

You're obviously quite a free-thinker, not willing to buckle to anyone's opinion. This would make you the strongest disciple you could ever trust when you come to acknowledge Him and grant Him His rightful position in your life.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Well I think it is a matter of perspective. If you feel like His expectations aren't reasonable then obviously you'll argue with them. For me I don't have any problem with what God expects of me, I'm most willing to change according to the way He shows me I need to because it is all for good reason. I think the hardest thing for a non-believer is to purely accept that God's reasons are perfect.

It has nothing to do with God's ways, expectations, or reasons. I'm saying it's not a free-choice. I'm not choosing between God and no-God, I'm choosing between reward and punishment. I just think that's choosing between the wrong things.

Well I'm not saying it isn't, but what I do say about it is that if you don't understand and accept God's definition of "good" then you'll not be able to quite impress Him enough by simply living up to your own definition of good. In order to be righteous in God's eyes, you must learn what He expects of you, and only then you may feel content that your best efforts to please Him will suffice.

Why do I need to impress God? Again, it's brought around to how doing good benefits me. I shouldn't do good for the benefit of others out of love and respect for my fellow man, but because it makes me look good in front of God. That doesn't work for me. That doesn't make sense to me. It defeats the point of being good, and especially being selfless.

That's exactly right, and that is why those who are more predisposed to evil will be much less inclined to behave Christ-like due to their nature. I would say that you've got a much easier path to salvation than someone who has committed murder, since you're more or less a reflection of the respectful person God admires. Do be wary of pride though, if you esteem yourself too highly you may not be able to see how highly you ought esteem God. So if you think you're a good enough person with a genuine motive to please God, but not yet Christian, you've obviously got some grudge against what God has told you in the Bible and that is what you ought to address instead of arguing about His methods of justice. It's clear that everyone who has established a healthy relationship with God is quite comfortable with His methods of justice - so who is it that has the greater problem, God or the one who doesn't agree with Him?

My grudge with what God says in the Bible is that I find it to be unbelievable, and it doesn't make sense to me. If God can make it so that it's believable, and makes sense, then I'm fine with it.

And no, this doesn't have anything to do with God's method of justice, or even justice at all.

I tend to agree with this statement, a belief based upon an expectation of getting something from God is only superfluous. The only truly valuable relationship is one of pure love and respect, acknowledging God for the creator and supreme king He is, and committing yourself without restraint to all that is good and pleasing to Him.

Okay, but wait for it...

Further to this, God has already given us what He chose to give us, and the devil has attempted to take that away. For those of us in His garden who grow to become the vine of Christ, He has promised to restore the original gift He gave (everlasting life without sin), but we must choose this very life/day/hour who we are going to believe. You're either for Christ or antichrist, it's a pretty clear decision we have to make and the more you push it away the further you have to go to get it back again.

...and, we're back to the free gift. It seems pretty inescapable when trying to convince me of God doesn't it? It seems there must always be a personal, even selfish, incentive to do good, and believe in God, whether it's to look good in front of God, avoid hell, or find eternal life. If anything, for these reasons, I would say that God's expectations seem absurdly low. Wouldn't God want us to do good for the sake of doing good, not for a personal reward? So why would God even offer it? Wouldn't God expect us to actually be good people, not just act like we are?

Which is why I find it insulting when people say that as an atheist I am dishonest. If I do something good for someone, it isn't because God commanded me to, it isn't because I'm investing in heaven, and it isn't to make God feel good. It is because I honestly want to do something good for someone.

You're obviously quite a free-thinker, not willing to buckle to anyone's opinion. This would make you the strongest disciple you could ever trust when you come to acknowledge Him and grant Him His rightful position in your life.

To be fair: If I'm convinced of someone else's opinion then I'm convinced of it, but I can't just accept something that doesn't make sense to me.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Why are atheists considered to be so dishonest?

Who say's they are ?

Christians do. Catholic-Christian, Edward_the_Theist, Mandyangel, and wayseer just as specific, local examples. Or Steve Harvey... Steve Harvey Or Pat Robertson ("How can there be peace when drunkards, drug dealers, communists, atheists, New Age worshipers of Satan, secular humanists, oppressive dictators, greedy money changers, revolutionary assassins, adulterers, and homosexuals are on top?"), Michael Montgomery, Ray Comfort, the Pope, and frankly, Americans. Seriously, just off of the top of my head. Although, I think The United States of America sort of covers my point.

Every one born on this planet has the same problem ( we call it sin ) the only difference is Jesus died to cover our ( past, future, present ) sin.. we all still sin..you ..me.. and every one between.. That is why God gave us the Cross, with one man to pay the price.. and Thanks God he did.. for we can do nothing in our own to make it to heaven.. but ask Jesus in to our heart, that is all God asks of us.. he made the door to heaven very easy.. what more would you have him do ?

He could sit down, explain it all to me, and answer a few questions. That would help me out a lot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
It has nothing to do with God's ways, expectations, or reasons. I'm saying it's not a free-choice. I'm not choosing between God and no-God, I'm choosing between reward and punishment. I just think that's choosing between the wrong things.
Well that contradicts what you said earlier: "That would not be genuine love for God, or respect for others, that's just looking out for myself.", And I agree with that statement. If you're motivated by the prospect of heaven or hell then your reason for loving God will not be genuine. I think love has to come first, at least that was my own experience. I just loved life so much I wanted to know how to thank the Lord, and if that means I spend all of eternity bowing to Him that's exactly what will please me the most.
Why do I need to impress God? Again, it's brought around to how doing good benefits me. I shouldn't do good for the benefit of others out of love and respect for my fellow man, but because it makes me look good in front of God. That doesn't work for me. That doesn't make sense to me. It defeats the point of being good, and especially being selfless.
The reason you need to impress God is because failure to do so is called "sin", which is the effect of harming His beloved creation. If you're really concerned with wanting to do good by everyone then you will certainly want to get familiar with what God originally had in mind when He created life.
My grudge with what God says in the Bible is that I find it to be unbelievable, and it doesn't make sense to me. If God can make it so that it's believable, and makes sense, then I'm fine with it.
Well quite obviously it's believable, there's plenty of us who attest to that. What you need to do if you want to believe it is discover your reason for doing so. Until you have a reason to believe it, you'll be swayed by your reasons not to believe it, in this case "it doesn't make sense". So if you want to make sense of it, you have to ask God to open your heart to it. This begins by acknowledging that there is a magnificent creator of life, and desiring to respect Him for it.

See if this verse makes sense to you:

Matthew 13:10-15 (New Living Translation)

10 His disciples came and asked him, “Why do you use parables when you talk to the people?”

11 He replied, “You are permitted to understand the secrets[a] of the Kingdom of Heaven, but others are not. 12 To those who listen to my teaching, more understanding will be given, and they will have an abundance of knowledge. But for those who are not listening, even what little understanding they have will be taken away from them. 13 That is why I use these parables,

For they look, but they don’t really see.
They hear, but they don’t really listen or understand.

14 This fulfills the prophecy of Isaiah that says,

‘When you hear what I say,
you will not understand.
When you see what I do,
you will not comprehend.
15 For the hearts of these people are hardened,
and their ears cannot hear,
and they have closed their eyes—
so their eyes cannot see,
and their ears cannot hear,
and their hearts cannot understand,
and they cannot turn to me
and let me heal them.’
And no, this doesn't have anything to do with God's method of justice, or even justice at all.
That's a good place to have your mind at because He hasn't told us what the future holds for the purpose of incentive, but to tell us the truthful answer to one of the greatest questions we have.
Okay, but wait for it...

...and, we're back to the free gift. It seems pretty inescapable when trying to convince me of God doesn't it? It seems there must always be a personal, even selfish, incentive to do good, and believe in God, whether it's to look good in front of God, avoid hell, or find eternal life. If anything, for these reasons, I would say that God's expectations seem absurdly low. Wouldn't God want us to do good for the sake of doing good, not for a personal reward? So why would God even offer it? Wouldn't God expect us to actually be good people, not just act like we are?
Well if you take the story in context, originally there was no sin, so the gift of everlasting life truly was a free gift. Only since the world has become sinful has death become an issue, and so has the matter of justice.
Which is why I find it insulting when people say that as an atheist I am dishonest. If I do something good for someone, it isn't because God commanded me to, it isn't because I'm investing in heaven, and it isn't to make God feel good. It is because I honestly want to do something good for someone.
That is certainly admirable, and you could even find yourself privy to God's grace on the day of judgment. Do be aware though that according to Christianity, the flesh is at war with the spirit and is constantly teaching us how to sin. So although you might think that a particular sin is a trivial matter (take homosexuality for example), the fact that you're ignoring the spirit in favor of the flesh predisposes you to sin, and the flesh will argue all sorts of reasons why you shouldn't heed the conscience and instead give into the pleasure of sinful desires while knowing full-well that God doesn't approve. No amount of good can offset the bad. Good is good, and bad is bad. They aren't mutually exclusive.
To be fair: If I'm convinced of someone else's opinion then I'm convinced of it, but I can't just accept something that doesn't make sense to me.
Yep, well belief/disbelief both begin with a decision and are increased gradually.
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
He could sit down, explain it all to me, and answer a few questions. That would help me out a lot.
He does do this with us you know, it is called "The Holy Spirit", who we receive when we accept Jesus into our lives and become born-again. Laying death to the old life of disbelief and rebellion against God, and to be born of the spirit of God, then you do have a personal connection with Jesus Christ, and He will explain everything you desire to know (as long as it is noble, don't suggest such a mockery as asking for lotto numbers).

I know for myself that when I was ready to accept God and I heard the antichrist verse, the Holy Spirit showed me everything I needed to know in less than a second, that I was sure I'd made the right decision. I'm not saying that everyone will have that same experience, but for me I was sufficiently frustrated and confused that when I begged God to reveal Himself to me, that particular approach is what He deemed suitable for me.

But you must be willing to hear what God says, Jesus won't barge in against your will and demand you make changes to your life, you have to be willing to seek what He would have you do differently. As I said just before, you have to discover your reason for wanting to know Him and that will be one of offering utmost respect to Him. And because of the nature of such a commitment, you can't possibly do it with only half a heart. You're literally committing your whole life (and an everlasting life) to learning what God expects of you, and putting His will before your own.

So for you as a non-believer to expect answers of God when you aren't perceptive to His voice, you might be best to find a good pastor and have a one-on-one with him. I remember before my conversion that I couldn't make heads-nor-tails of the Bible, essentially because the author didn't seem real to me, but I was able to hear everything that a living human would say.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Well that contradicts what you said earlier: "That would not be genuine love for God, or respect for others, that's just looking out for myself.", And I agree with that statement. If you're motivated by the prospect of heaven or hell then your reason for loving God will not be genuine. I think love has to come first, at least that was my own experience. I just loved life so much I wanted to know how to thank the Lord, and if that means I spend all of eternity bowing to Him that's exactly what will please me the most.

Actually, they're exactly the same point, said differently.

The reason you need to impress God is because failure to do so is called "sin", which is the effect of harming His beloved creation. If you're really concerned with wanting to do good by everyone then you will certainly want to get familiar with what God originally had in mind when He created life.

I'm sorry, but I cannot look at Christians, or religious people as a whole and think that they are somehow privy to some special information from God about how to treat humanity well. From where I sit, it doesn't look as though they do.

Well quite obviously it's believable, there's plenty of us who attest to that. What you need to do if you want to believe it is discover your reason for doing so. Until you have a reason to believe it, you'll be swayed by your reasons not to believe it, in this case "it doesn't make sense". So if you want to make sense of it, you have to ask God to open your heart to it. This begins by acknowledging that there is a magnificent creator of life, and desiring to respect Him for it.

It doesn't work that way for me. If I wanted to believe in Scientology, I would simply believe in Scientology. If I wanted to believe in Allah, I'd believe in Allah. If I wanted to believe in the tenets of Buddhism or Hinduism, I would simply believe. If I wanted to believe in ghosts, and UFOs and the Loch Ness Monster, I would. But I don't "want to believe." I want to be able to find the truth, not settle on believing in something for the sake of believing in something. If the Christian God is the truth, then It has an infinite number of ways of making me believe, not the least of which are convincing me, or just making me believe. But I'm not going to believe because I want to, but because I have no other option. Essentially, I have to believe against my will, because that is the only way I will truly believe. These stories may be believable to you, but they just aren't believable to me.

See if this verse makes sense to you:

Yeah, I suppose I understand the verse. I spent a long time "listening," and found nothing. So I started looking.

John 24-29: Now Thomas (also known as Didymus[a]), one of the Twelve, was not with the disciples when Jesus came. 25 So the other disciples told him, “We have seen the Lord!”
But he said to them, “Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my finger where the nails were, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.”

26 A week later his disciples were in the house again, and Thomas was with them. Though the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you!” 27 Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe.”

28 Thomas said to him, “My Lord and my God!”

29 Then Jesus told him, “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”


Now if you're a believer then this is not a parable. And it should be noted that Jesus showed all of the apostles his hands, and side before they believed, but Thomas was different. Thomas was told of Jesus' return, and he was skeptical, maybe wrongly, but he was. And Jesus understood, acknowledged that, and gave Thomas what he needed to believe. Maybe the blessed are those who believe without seeing, but so is Thomas the Believer, and he had to see to believe.

That's a good place to have your mind at because He hasn't told us what the future holds for the purpose of incentive, but to tell us the truthful answer to one of the greatest questions we have.

But He did. Heaven and Hell. Eternal life, or eternal torment. That's pretty basic.

Well if you take the story in context, originally there was no sin, so the gift of everlasting life truly was a free gift. Only since the world has become sinful has death become an issue, and so has the matter of justice.

Okay, but the point still is that it is a reward. I don't really need the reward, I really don't see how death is that bad. I cease to exist. I didn't exist before I did, and it wasn't bad. Dying might be terrible, but death I don't see as being bad.

That is certainly admirable, and you could even find yourself privy to God's grace on the day of judgment.

Arrrrghhh!

Do be aware though that according to Christianity, the flesh is at war with the spirit and is constantly teaching us how to sin. So although you might think that a particular sin is a trivial matter (take homosexuality for example), the fact that you're ignoring the spirit in favor of the flesh predisposes you to sin, and the flesh will argue all sorts of reasons why you shouldn't heed the conscience and instead give into the pleasure of sinful desires while knowing full-well that God doesn't approve.

I don't know full well what God does and doesn't approve of. According to my in-laws it's cheeseburgers, shellfish, and bacon and eggs. I don't really understand why God doesn't approve of cheeseburgers, they're delicious! According to my colleague it's seeing women's hair. According to another it's eating beef (cheeseburgers again!). I just assume that if there's a God, He wouldn't approve of me punching a guy in the face. However, more importantly, the guy wouldn't approve of me punching him in the face.

No amount of good can offset the bad. Good is good, and bad is bad. They aren't mutually exclusive.

Yep, well belief/disbelief both begin with a decision and are increased gradually.

I don't think so. I mean, you can certainly decide to believe, but from where I sit, that isn't true belief, there is no basis for it. That doesn't last for me because I will always have to question it, and with no basis for belief, I have to move on. That's just the way I work.

He does do this with us you know, it is called "The Holy Spirit", who we receive when we accept Jesus into our lives and become born-again. Laying death to the old life of disbelief and rebellion against God, and to be born of the spirit of God, then you do have a personal connection with Jesus Christ, and He will explain everything you desire to know (as long as it is noble, don't suggest such a mockery as asking for lotto numbers).

I know for myself that when I was ready to accept God and I heard the antichrist verse, the Holy Spirit showed me everything I needed to know in less than a second, that I was sure I'd made the right decision. I'm not saying that everyone will have that same experience, but for me I was sufficiently frustrated and confused that when I begged God to reveal Himself to me, that particular approach is what He deemed suitable for me.

But you must be willing to hear what God says, Jesus won't barge in against your will and demand you make changes to your life, you have to be willing to seek what He would have you do differently. As I said just before, you have to discover your reason for wanting to know Him and that will be one of offering utmost respect to Him. And because of the nature of such a commitment, you can't possibly do it with only half a heart. You're literally committing your whole life (and an everlasting life) to learning what God expects of you, and putting His will before your own.

So for you as a non-believer to expect answers of God when you aren't perceptive to His voice, you might be best to find a good pastor and have a one-on-one with him. I remember before my conversion that I couldn't make heads-nor-tails of the Bible, essentially because the author didn't seem real to me, but I was able to hear everything that a living human would say.

Thanks, but no Holy Spirit for me yet, which is my point. The only reason I can come up with for wanting to know God is that He is the truth. And I don't believe that. At least not right now. If God wants me He knows an infinite number of ways to get me. I even know of a few. Nothing yet. In the meantime I have lots of other places to look.

And no, no more pastors. Fool me thrice and all that...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Actually, they're exactly the same point, said differently.
Well why is it that when I read it, the first doesn't mention the right way to worship God, while the second does?

"It has nothing to do with God's ways, expectations, or reasons. I'm saying it's not a free-choice. I'm not choosing between God and no-God, I'm choosing between reward and punishment. I just think that's choosing between the wrong things."

There, you're just complaining about slaving for a reward.

"That would not be genuine love for God, or respect for others, that's just looking out for myself."

Here you are saying the correct way to worship God is not by slaving for a reward.

I think in light of whether we look for right or wrong in what we read, there is quite a variety of meanings we can derive from a text.
I'm sorry, but I cannot look at Christians, or religious people as a whole and think that they are somehow privy to some special information from God about how to treat humanity well. From where I sit, it doesn't look as though they do.
Well that is the matter of what you must decide for yourself. Sadly you are right about that, many "Christians" don't have the correct relationship with God because they haven't come to Christ for the right reason, instead they are motivated by self esteem, greasing up to their pastor and peers. In fact the majority of those Christians you see as being the intolerant ones aren't even listening to Jesus, they're listening to their pastor! Their pastor preaches against abortion and they bomb the clinics, their pastor preaches against homosexuality and they draw picket lines. I know what you're saying very well, Paul predicted the coming of false teachers, and even identified plenty of them while he was alive, and if you have concerns about the sort of behaviour you know to be wrong, then you ought not fear that you'll ever become that sort of person. Your conscience is already working.
It doesn't work that way for me. If I wanted to believe in Scientology, I would simply believe in Scientology. If I wanted to believe in Allah, I'd believe in Allah. If I wanted to believe in the tenets of Buddhism or Hinduism, I would simply believe. If I wanted to believe in ghosts, and UFOs and the Loch Ness Monster, I would. But I don't "want to believe." I want to be able to find the truth, not settle on believing in something for the sake of believing in something. If the Christian God is the truth, then It has an infinite number of ways of making me believe, not the least of which are convincing me, or just making me believe. But I'm not going to believe because I want to, but because I have no other option. Essentially, I have to believe against my will, because that is the only way I will truly believe. These stories may be believable to you, but they just aren't believable to me.
Yes yes yes, totally the hardest thing is to overcome the argument of the flesh and listen to the spirit. I don't even know how to tell you how to do that, but I do know that if you're genuinely interested in knowing God then you'll never give up until you've truly found Him. I can tell you that God has done everything that is reasonably expected of Him to prove who He is, there's a whole universe of incredible design to prove that we can never possess the same knowledge He has, there's the Bible as a testimony of the history of His people which is incredibly accurate and reliable, there's the evidence of Jesus Christ who never put a foot wrong or said something false, and there's evidence in the lives of Christians all over the world that the Holy Spirit has the power to unite us with God. For all these reasons there are countless arguments against, so your decision is one of determining whether all this evidence that God has given us is really just to be discarded because you are expecting something of Him which He has decided not to give you.
Yeah, I suppose I understand the verse. I spent a long time "listening," and found nothing. So I started looking.
Well it would seem that you have yet to contribute a certain matter of faith to the topic. Take a read of Hebrews 11 Hebrews 11 - Passage Lookup - New Living Translation - BibleGateway.com to learn about what faith is. In fact Hebrews is a very good read, I suggest if you haven't read it yet, sit down for half an hour and read the whole thing through.
John 24-29: Now Thomas (also known as Didymus[a]), one of the Twelve, was not with the disciples when Jesus came. 25 So the other disciples told him, “We have seen the Lord!”
But he said to them, “Unless I see the nail marks in his hands and put my finger where the nails were, and put my hand into his side, I will not believe.”

26 A week later his disciples were in the house again, and Thomas was with them. Though the doors were locked, Jesus came and stood among them and said, “Peace be with you!” 27 Then he said to Thomas, “Put your finger here; see my hands. Reach out your hand and put it into my side. Stop doubting and believe.”

28 Thomas said to him, “My Lord and my God!”

29 Then Jesus told him, “Because you have seen me, you have believed; blessed are those who have not seen and yet have believed.”


Now if you're a believer then this is not a parable. And it should be noted that Jesus showed all of the apostles his hands, and side before they believed, but Thomas was different. Thomas was told of Jesus' return, and he was skeptical, maybe wrongly, but he was. And Jesus understood, acknowledged that, and gave Thomas what he needed to believe. Maybe the blessed are those who believe without seeing, but so is Thomas the Believer, and he had to see to believe.
Most certainly, there is no way that believing becomes real until God becomes real to us, and for that to happen we must be prepared to hear what He says to us. Admittedly some people require less of a reason than others, some people have had physical experiences with Him, others merely spiritual, and others yet have only taken the word of their fellow man for testimony. I also know that He never turns away a true seeker, but that is not as easy to do as it is to say, because accepting God means to cut loose some particular desires we have to not comply with His commands. I'm not sure exactly what the particular hurdles are that you can't get over, but I'm sure you do know. So (forgive me for saying so) you'll have to really be honest with yourself about that, and if you can accept the particular problem you have with the Bible, then you can progress to acknowledge that God wants something from you that you don't want to give Him.
But He did. Heaven and Hell. Eternal life, or eternal torment. That's pretty basic.
Well that's obviously the way it is. When we ask what happens after life, do you expect Him to be honest or lie? I think He has very good reason for disclosing this information to us, it's not every person who can comprehend the reality of eternal life before it's been granted to them, but I have no doubts whatsoever that many people in their lifetime have come to understand the nature of God by hearing and accepting His methods of justice. And if this information has saved even one soul then would you dispute that God should never have spoken to us of it?
Okay, but the point still is that it is a reward. I don't really need the reward, I really don't see how death is that bad. I cease to exist. I didn't exist before I did, and it wasn't bad. Dying might be terrible, but death I don't see as being bad.
You merely have no idea what is in store. Consider the human with all his limbs, takes life for granted. Consider a human who loses his limb, is filled with remorse for a while at the severe loss. Consider the human who is ignorant to computers who one day discovers the thrills of such a toy. Consider the dog who finds a new thrill when given a bone. The point is that we can be content with anything God has given us if that is our attitude about it, but it is not until we discover the greatest gift which is the knowledge of God that we can ever comprehend how good it is. God is the one who gives us what we want, He is the giver. The problem we face is that we tend to want things that God doesn't want to give us, so we become takers. Also might I say, it's a dangerous proposition you make in that statement. When the creator of the universe and life has told us what the story about life is, what is expected of us, and what is promised, and you think you can make up your own rules and believe that death is the end of your life, that's you thumbing your nose at Him. Is that the antichrist speaking to you, that Christ lived died and rose for someone other than you?
Arrrrghhh!
What? Don't you think that good should be praised and evil should be punished? Care to explain?
I don't know full well what God does and doesn't approve of. According to my in-laws it's cheeseburgers, shellfish, and bacon and eggs. I don't really understand why God doesn't approve of cheeseburgers, they're delicious! According to my colleague it's seeing women's hair. According to another it's eating beef (cheeseburgers again!). I just assume that if there's a God, He wouldn't approve of me punching a guy in the face. However, more importantly, the guy wouldn't approve of me punching him in the face.
Now that is a very good point to raise, one that I think you do already know the answer to, and it basically comes down to common-sense. Deciding what fits well with your conscience and at the expense of greed or whatever other fleshly motive there is to contest the conscience.
Romans 2
14 Even Gentiles, who do not have God’s written law, show that they know his law when they instinctively obey it, even without having heard it. 15 They demonstrate that God’s law is written in their hearts, for their own conscience and thoughts either accuse them or tell them they are doing right. 16 And this is the message I proclaim—that the day is coming when God, through Christ Jesus, will judge everyone’s secret life.

And

Romans 14 (New Living Translation)

The Danger of Criticism

1 Accept other believers who are weak in faith, and don’t argue with them about what they think is right or wrong. 2 For instance, one person believes it’s all right to eat anything. But another believer with a sensitive conscience will eat only vegetables. 3 Those who feel free to eat anything must not look down on those who don’t. And those who don’t eat certain foods must not condemn those who do, for God has accepted them. 4 Who are you to condemn someone else’s servants? They are responsible to the Lord, so let him judge whether they are right or wrong. And with the Lord’s help, they will do what is right and will receive his approval.

According to Paul, and as a consistent message through all his letters, the matter of sin is the matter of disobeying the conscience. And it takes a conscious effort to strenthen ones rebellion against the conscience.
I don't think so. I mean, you can certainly decide to believe, but from where I sit, that isn't true belief, there is no basis for it. That doesn't last for me because I will always have to question it, and with no basis for belief, I have to move on. That's just the way I work.
I can tell you I moved on at one point and after a long excursion came to plead with God to bring me back. Now after having the reality of life with God and without God as direct comparisons, I do firmly believe that there will be no such time where I might turn from God again. Of course, your life, your decisions.
Thanks, but no Holy Spirit for me yet, which is my point. The only reason I can come up with for wanting to know God is that He is the truth. And I don't believe that. At least not right now. If God wants me He knows an infinite number of ways to get me. I even know of a few. Nothing yet. In the meantime I have lots of other places to look.
Yes, well it has to be a mutual decision. When it happens will be at just the right moment when you both have exactly the same understanding of the nature of the arrangement.
And no, no more pastors. Fool me thrice and all that...
Oh you've been fooled! Yet another feather in your cap ;) Yes, you can't rely too much on a human, in fact I would warn you as any good pastor would, against blatantly trusting what someone says until you can verify that it is consistent with the truth that God has revealed to us in the Bible.
 
Upvote 0

znr

Report THIS.
Site Supporter
Apr 13, 2010
4,465
56
Silverado
✟76,420.00
Faith
Reformed
Marital Status
Private
I've been spending the past while, trying to feel out Christianity's impression of atheists (the people, not the belief system). The most common impression that believers seem to have of atheists is that we are somehow inherently dishonest, and prone to lying and manipulation.

What is this accusation based on? I have my theories, but I'm curious as to where you suppose this line of thought comes from?

Wha??? my 2 cents

I don't agree that atheists are dishonest and nor are Christians honest by default. Quite the opposite for us.

Christ is the gap between my inherent dishonesty and my redemption.

I've known very dishonest people of all types and religions (or non religious).

Whoever keeps repeating that athiests are somehow more dishonest is spending way too much time pointing out and not enough time being an example of what all forms of honesty are.
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Can I just say how impressed I am that no less than two posters on here who claimed that atheists aren't really dishonest, have gone on to express on another thread on ChristianForums how dishonest atheists are.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan of irony, but you folk are literally "unbelievable."
 
Upvote 0

oi_antz

Opposed to Untruth.
Apr 26, 2010
5,696
277
New Zealand
✟7,997.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Can I just say how impressed I am that no less than two posters on here who claimed that atheists aren't really dishonest, have gone on to express on another thread on ChristianForums how dishonest atheists are.

Don't get me wrong, I'm a big fan of irony, but you folk are literally "unbelievable."

Good observation there! Yes, some Christians think it is their duty to con people into salvation by any means necessary. I think those are the ones who don't realize the importance of genuine repentance, since you are dabbling with spirits whose desire is to destroy, it does mean that you ought not trust anyone except God Himself. There are many teachings originating from the spirits of deception that will lull you into a false sense of security, especially thinking that trivial sin is ok, or that you can relax because Jesus has saved you. Paul warns us about misplacing our trust:

Acts 20:25-31
25 “And now I know that none of you to whom I have preached the Kingdom will ever see me again. 26 I declare today that I have been faithful. If anyone suffers eternal death, it’s not my fault,[g] 27 for I didn’t shrink from declaring all that God wants you to know.

28 “So guard yourselves and God’s people. Feed and shepherd God’s flock—his church, purchased with his own blood[h]—over which the Holy Spirit has appointed you as elders. 29 I know that false teachers, like vicious wolves, will come in among you after I leave, not sparing the flock. 30 Even some men from your own group will rise up and distort the truth in order to draw a following. 31 Watch out! Remember the three years I was with you—my constant watch and care over you night and day, and my many tears for you.


I think there's something interesting to consider from this. What is the motive someone has to try to convince you about Christianity? Surely there is some sort of gratification by helping another achieve a personal realization of God. Then there are other forms of gratification, of which Paul mentions money is a biggie (as I'm sure you're well aware), and others crave power. Other's simply get a kick from knowing someone is listening to their opinion. These are inherently selfish motives, but there is one teacher who was completely selfless even to the point of death. You know who that is, and if you have committed any time to researching His life, you'll know why we say that He is the only person with such integrity proven worthy of trusting. I know there have been many martyrs through history for many causes, but none so much to sweat drops of blood for taking on the personal guilt and receiving God's justice for another's sin. To receive justice for your own sin is enough to retort! But to receive judgment for another's sin when you're innocent, how might that feel? I understand it is something only Christ would do due to the eternal love for His creation.

Here's more information about false teachers: 2 peter 2 - Passage Lookup - New Living Translation - BibleGateway.com

There seems a prominent theme amongst all this talk of truth and dishonesty, it is emphasizing the importance of thinking for yourself and not to believe every opinion based on it's popularity or some sort of personal reward.

Hey, did you always have that signature, I thought it belonged to another person.. Most of those quotes (granted I have not the original context) seem to reflect certain attitudes of intolerance, and each one of them I would personally refute or rephrase. There is one there however (and only one) which I think is almost perfect:

hardihood: "Whoever says Christ is not the son is the Antichrist."

Although I wouldn't say these people are "the" antichrist per-se since we don't actually know who that person is just yet, I would say they are the ones who listen to the antichrist spirit's argument to dethrone Christ.

It would be interesting to know whether you as an Atheist would agree that denying Christ's title of "son of God" is consistent with what you would expect from the spirit of the antichrist, or whether you think that comment is not actually correct that denying Christ's title is not an antichrist attitude?
 
Upvote 0

JGG

Well-Known Member
Mar 12, 2006
12,018
2,098
✟65,945.00
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Hey, did you always have that signature, I thought it belonged to another person.. Most of those quotes (granted I have not the original context) seem to reflect certain attitudes of intolerance, and each one of them I would personally refute or rephrase. There is one there however (and only one) which I think is almost perfect:

hardihood: "Whoever says Christ is not the son is the Antichrist."

Although I wouldn't say these people are "the" antichrist per-se since we don't actually know who that person is just yet, I would say they are the ones who listen to the antichrist spirit's argument to dethrone Christ.

It would be interesting to know whether you as an Atheist would agree that denying Christ's title of "son of God" is consistent with what you would expect from the spirit of the antichrist, or whether you think that comment is not actually correct that denying Christ's title is not an antichrist attitude?

As it turns out, there's one quote I agree with too (provided I edit it a bit):

The Penitent Man: "You can't just demand courtesy and respect from other people if you treat them like garbage. This is the Golden Rule."

If there really is an Antichrist, I really doubt it's mission is to ruin Christ's "title." However, if it's meant to make sure that nobody follows in Christ's footsteps, and turn people off of Christ's message, then it seems far more likely to be your camp, not mine that possesses the spirit of the Antichrist.
 
Upvote 0