Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Only because you refuse to differentiate between existential age and physical age.
Embedded evolution would be Omphalos; and why would God embed evolution, then write that He did something else?
He didn't 'embed 4.5 billion years of time on earth in 6,000 years', He embedded 4.5 billion years of age in the earth in the moment it was created.
He knows that, but his post is so full of errors about what I claim, he can't see it.
Given that age is how long something has physically existed there is no difference.
Your embedded age is Omphalos anyway, I don't see why that is a problem for you, other than the fact you don't like the term. You see, either your embedded age involved the passage of time, in which case you can include embedded evolution too, or it did not involve the passage of time, in which case, while you call it 'age' it is really something else that only has the appearance of age, and is pure Omphalos.
Isaiah 64:8 But now, O LORD, thou art our father; we are the clay, and thou our potter; and we all are the work of thy hand.
A pretty long first day.
Then don't give it that --- give it definition #4 in answers.com.
Suit yourself, Assyrian --- but don't expect me to kowtow to your reluctance.
Interesting remark in light of the fact that I don't even use it in my definition of Embedded Age, isn't it?
From answers.com:
In Adam's case, the physical characteristics would be limited, for two reasons:
What a bizarre way to say you won't back up your claims.
