Okay, let's look at this list, CreedIsChrist.
Linda Gordon: "The nuclear family must be destroyed... Whatever its ultimate meaning, the break-up of families now is an objectively revolutionary process."
Gordon wrote whatever that quote has been mined from before 1970. She's not well-known enough to be on Wikipedia, and the only references to her I can find are in documents opposing her position.
Robin Morgan: "I feel that 'man-hating' is an honorable and viable political act, that the oppressed have a right to class-hatred against the class that is oppressing them."
Well, firstly, Morgan was editor of Ms. Magazine in 1990-1993 - so
15 years ago... She did most of her writing in the 70s. I am unable to find the source of this quotation. It's all over the internet, but always with nothing but "Robin Morgan, Ms. Magazine editor", which suggests that it may be spurious.
"I haven't the faintest notion what possible revolutionary role white hetero- sexual men could fulfill, since they are the very embodiment of reactionary- vested-interest-power."
Here's Morgan's own response to that quotation,
recorded at some point post-2000:
"That quote is from the early 1970s and fortunately both the movement and I have matured in terms of developing a much more sophisticated range of tactics and strategies, due to our enormous numbers, than we ever could have imagined back in the late 60s and early 70s. While it is still true that "pale males" are at the top of the "food chain" - more men are changing every day. They're more involved with their children and families and on every level, from slowly learning to use Ms. through to adopting and adapting to anti-sexual harrassment workplace rules, men have been changing. It's not enough by far, but it is a start. And it's the power of the women's movement that has brought them even this far."
Woo, fear the big scary feminist! o_0
"We can't destroy the inequities between men and women until we destroy marriage."
This quotation is from a book published in 1970. Given the above response that Ms Morgan gave to another quotation from around this time, I would imagine that her views have changed - as indeed the world and the political climate have, since 1970.
"I claim that rape exists any time sexual intercourse occurs when it has not been initiated by the woman, out of her own genuine affection and desire."
Again, a quotation from 1974. Feminism has moved on since then, you know.
Well, enough with Robin Morgan, who is but one woman with views that not every feminist agrees with. Let's move on.
Valerie Solanas: "To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse]."
Ah, Valerie Solanas. Well, firstly, she was pretty messed up.
She was regularly sexually abused by her father as a child, and was homeless at 15. Surprised she didn't like men very much? She was clearly psychologically damaged; she shot Andy Warhol when he wouldn't produce her film. Secondly, the SCUM Manifesto was published in 1967, and she claimed it was never meant to be taken seriously. I would say that very few people - particularly not feminists - take it seriously today. So as an example of a "feminist leader" (whatever one of those is), she's hardly ideal.
Sheila Cronin: "Since marriage constitutes slavery for women, it is clear that the women's movement must concentrate on attacking this institution. Freedom for women cannot be won without the abolition of marriage."
Sheila Cronin also fails to warrent a Wikipedia entry, and isn't even mentioned in the NOW entry. In fact, on
the NOW website, there's no mention of a Sheila Cronin at all. Nor can I find this quotation anywhere except on websites opposing the opinion it states. I smell a phony quotation, don't you?
Andrea Dworkin: "I want to see a man beaten to a bloody pulp with a high-heel shoved in his mouth, like an apple in the mouth of a pig."
This is a quotation from a work of fiction.
"Marriage as an institution developed from rape as a practice."
Hyperbole, but not obviously false. Dworkin goes on to say, "Rape, originally defined as abduction, became marriage by capture. Marriage meant the taking was to extend in time, to be not only use of but possession of, or ownership." Is she wrong, given that she's referring to a time when men could divorce their wives for refusing sex, runaway wives were forcibly returned, and there was no such thing as marital rape? Certainly, it is not an insane remark. It is a discussion worth having.
"Heterosexual intercourse is the pure, formalized expression of contempt for women's bodies."
Can't find a reference for this, and it only appears on websites opposing it.
"In my own life, I don't have intercourse. That is my choice."
So? She's chaste! You should be pleased!
Anyway - I'm hardly Dworkins' biggest fan, but guess what? She's one radical feminist. Most feminists (there are a lot of us) don't share her views. In fact, she has alienated many women, and heterosexual women especially. But again, look at her background. She was beaten and abused by her husband. Is it so astonishing that she was angry? And do you think that today's feminists are incapable of thinking critically?
By the way, do you condemn Dworkins' activism around raising awareness of spousal battery and rape?
Ti-Grace Atkinson: "The institution of sexual intercourse is anti-feminist."
Ti-Grace Atkinson's radical feminist group was active until 1973, and hasn't published since 1974. Again, she is a single radical feminist. Her views are not representative of those of most modern-day feminists.
Susan Brownmiller: "Rape is nothing more or less than a conscious process of intimidation by which all men keep all women in a state of fear."
Yet again, a radical feminist of the 70s. We've moved on.
Sheila Jeffrys: "When a woman reaches [bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse][bless and do not curse] with a man she is only collaborating with the patriarchal system, eroticizing her own oppression."
Sheila Jeffrys doesn't get a Wikipedia entry. I can't seem to find out who she is. Clearly not a "feminist leader", then...
Catherine MacKinnon: "Politically, I call it rape whenever a woman has sex and feels violated."
Do you disagree?
"All sex, even consensual sex between a married couple, is an act of violence perpetrated against a woman."
MacKinnon sees penetrative sex as violent. Most feminists do not agree with her.
"In a patriarchal society, all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent."
Hey, look!
http://www.snopes.com/quotes/mackinnon.asp
Quoted from Snopes.com:
"MacKinnon was further tied to the quote she did not utter by a March 1999 article by conservative commentator Cal Thomas in which he incorrectly identified her as the author of Professing Feminism and quoted her as saying: "In a patriarchal society all heterosexual intercourse is rape because women, as a group, are not strong enough to give meaningful consent." Not only is the quote misattributed, but the putative source, Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales From The Strange World of Women's Studies, is a book criticizing the work of MacKinnon and other feminists, written by Daphne Patai and Noretta Koertge."
Well that just totally undermined the credibility of your little list (well, Conservapedia's little list, actually), didn't it?
Sharon Stone: "The more famous and powerful I get the more power I have to hurt men."
I can only find this quotation on anti-feminist websites.
Jodie Foster: "Ninety-five percent of women's experiences are about being a victim. Or about being an underdog, or having to survive... women didn't go to Vietnam and blow things up. They are not Rambo."
I don't see how this quotation can make you annoyed about feminism. Weird.
Sally Miller Gearheart: "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race."
Guess what? Another one of those rather nuts 70s radical feminists. Does anyone take her seriously nowadays? I think not.
Susan Griffin: "And if the professional rapist is to be separated from the average dominant heterosexual (male), it may be mainly a quantitative difference."
In context, you'll notice that Griffin is talking about a very real problem that women face: the almost casual rape and sexual assault perpetrated by some white heterosexual men. She writes, for example, "The scenario is even further complicated by the expectation that, not only does a woman mean 'yes' when she says 'no,' but that a really decent woman ought to begin by saying 'no,' and then be led down the primrose path to acquiescence." She has a point.
Mary Daly: "If life is to survive on this planet, there must be a decontamination of the Earth. I think this will be accompanied by an evolutionary process that will result in a drastic reduction of the population of males."
Yep, I concede this one; Mary Daly is a class-A crazy person. I don't know any feminists who take her seriously, though. She is no "feminist leader".
Catherine Comins: "Men who are unjustly accused of rape can sometime gain from the experience."
Taken
in context, this is a slightly less peculiar remark than it might immediately seem.
"They have a lot of pain, but it is not necessarily pain that I would have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self[wash my mouth]-exploration. 'How do I see women?' 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?' 'Do I have the power to do what they say I did?' Those are good questions.'"
However, regardless, Comins has never published. She was one woman at one American college who had some pretty weird ideas about protecting women. She is not a "feminist leader" (whatever one of those is supposed to be).
Marilyn French: "As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women...he can sexually molest his daughters... THE VAST MAJORITY OF MEN IN THE WORLD DO ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE."
Wel, this is a flagrant misrepresentation of Ms French's position. The quote
in context:
"As long as some men use physical force to subjugate females, all men need not. The knowledge that some men do suffices to threaten all women. Beyond that, it is not necessary to beat up a woman to beat her down. A man can simply refuse to hire women in well-paid jobs, extract as much or more work from women than men but pay them less, or treat women disrespectfully at work or at home. He can fail to support a child he has engendered, demand the woman he lives with wait on him like a servant. He can beat or kill the woman he claims to love; he can rape women, whether mate, acquaintance, or stranger; he can rape or sexually molest his daughters, nieces, stepchildren, or the children of a woman he claims to love. The vast majority of men in the world do one or more of the above."
Essentially what she's saying is: all men benefit from patriarchy. Not an insane position, especially when the role of patriarchy-as-a-whole (as opposed to the behaviour of men as individuals) in the oppression of women is often played down.
"My feelings about men are the result of my experience. I have little sympathy for them. Like a Jew just released from Dachau, I watch the handsome young Nazi soldier fall writhing to the ground with a bullet in his stomach and I look briefly and walk on. I don't even need to shrug. I simply don't care. What he was, as a person, I mean, what his shames and yearnings were, simply don't matter."
"All men are rapists and that's all they are"
These are both quotations from a work of fiction, The Women's Room.
So, in conclusion, a pretty ropey list of quotations which were, if not apparently entirely apocryphal, mostly written or said in the 70s or earlier, and which are far from representative of the views of most feminists. Quoting these women to represent the views of modern mainstream feminists is like quoting Fred Phelps in order to give an indication of the views of modern mainstream Christians. I won't bother with the other half of the list - this was very time-consuming - but I hope I've demonstrated that the list is (probably deliberately) misleading and in any case a far cry from the views of feminists today.