• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

YEC's/ sheep

J

Jet Black

Guest
Drotar said:
Yeah. That makes sense. :sigh:

I'm really confused about all this.

Tell me... do traits that a new population develops that are favorable... are those traits introduced, or are they reoccurences resulting from genetic recombination?

Have they been present all along but been in the background (in their genotype but not their phenotype), or is it just that the new traits that offers a better chance of survival simply appear? (never present in their genotype before)

It is a mixture of the two. there are some traits that are simply the result of variation, the mixing of different alleles (versions of a gene) from the two parents, which have already been present in the population... note that you need a fairly large population in order to have a number of different traits (a start population of 2 will not give much variation)... however the different alleles are formed by mutation of the gene. so these mutations are newly introduced traits. a simple example of this is tongue rolling... try to roll your tongue, you might or might not be able to do that... that is the result of a single gene mutation.
 
Upvote 0
D

Drotar

Guest
You know, like Answers in Genesis, it almost seems like transpeciation makes sense. As in the context of genetic recombination.

The creation of new traits via mutations seems a little unlikely by all standards.

But to I'm going to have to do more thinking. I need to thank everyone for being honest and giving me more science to sort through and apply. I'm going to take another read at a biology textbook and take a break from here. I'll come back if I have questions, but it's not in me to simply ignore evidence for something. Thanks for the help. Don't take this to mean I'm becoming Old Earth, but, merely having seen how my system slams against many inconsistencies, I'll have to reconfigure what I believe or simply ignore what logic and biology says. Give me a few weeks to take a look. TTYL Jesus loves you!
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Drotar said:
God created it, a helpless animal, and uses it constantly as a symbol of our reliance on God. See Psalm 23.

Sheep presents a bit of a problem for evolutionists, because they just seemed to show up about 6,000 years ago and there really is no history of where they came from.
 
Upvote 0
J

Jet Black

Guest
Drotar said:
The creation of new traits via mutations seems a little unlikely by all standards.

heh, I have a couple of new traits, I think via mutation, since I do not know anyone else alive who can do this :p

one of them is that I have individual control over the last joint in my finger, so I can bend it without bending the rest of the finger... I can do this in all my fingers. I am the only member of my family who can do this, and the only person I know of who can do this.
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Jet Black said:
:rolleyes:

wild sheep john, wild sheep!

and the domestication began over 10,000 years ago.

Ok, even if sheep have been around for 6 to 10 thousand years. There is just no solid evidence of there being any sort of sheep before that time. Just a lot of speculation.
 
Upvote 0
D

Drotar

Guest
Jet Black said:
heh, I have a couple of new traits, I think via mutation, since I do not know anyone else alive who can do this :p

one of them is that I have individual control over the last joint in my finger, so I can bend it without bending the rest of the finger... I can do this in all my fingers. I am the only member of my family who can do this, and the only person I know of who can do this.

OK, I meant traits that are going to ensure your survival as opposed to everyone else who can't... control over the last joint in their finger.

I meant traits that benefit the species so substantially that it increases their survival rate by a wide margin.

I can see it happening through the resurgence of old traits through genetic recombination.

But not through random mutation. Like I said, possible, but too unlikely. I'm going to stick with solid facts here.

And like AIG's article, it seems that transpeciation through the latter model is a scientific possibility. More than that, an actual occurence.
 
Upvote 0
J

Jet Black

Guest
well it is a relatively large change really, adding extra functionality to a joint, that no-one else has. the only reason it doesn't get selected for is because there is no selective force. now one thing about this mutation is that it makes me a better rock climber, since I can hang from that joint alone. given the correct environment, this could have ensured survival and could have been a gene that was passed on.

The majority of traits aren't substantial changes though, just relatively small ones, and these are amplified over time.
 
Upvote 0

troodon

Be wise and be smart
Dec 16, 2002
1,698
58
41
University of Iowa
Visit site
✟32,147.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Drotar said:
OK, I meant traits that are going to ensure your survival as opposed to everyone else who can't... control over the last joint in their finger.

I meant traits that benefit the species so substantially that it increases their survival rate by a wide margin

From an old post of mine:

troodon said:

Hope this helps :)
 
Upvote 0

JohnR7

Well-Known Member
Feb 9, 2002
25,258
209
Ohio
✟29,532.00
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Jet Black said:
?

this isn't a biggest.... vegtable... competition you know.

No it is a science board and science requires evidence. Show me your evidence that sheep evolved. This should not be difficult for you to show me that sheep have been around for more than 10,000 years. After all you have pretty good evidence that man has been around longer than 10,000 years. So show me the evidence for the sheep.
 
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
80
Visit site
✟38,431.00
Faith
Unitarian
JohnR7 said:
No it is a science board and science requires evidence. Show me your evidence that sheep evolved. This should not be difficult for you to show me that sheep have been around for more than 10,000 years. After all you have pretty good evidence that man has been around longer than 10,000 years. So show me the evidence for the sheep.

Molecular evidence indicates that sheep were domesticated about 10,000 years ago from more than one species of wild sheep.

http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/proc_bio/abstracts/hiendleder.htm

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...ve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12028771&dopt=Abstract

If Drotar ever tangled with a bighorn ram or even a domestic ram that was feeling cranky he might not think they were so defenseless, that is if he survived the experience with no more than a few broken bones.

The Frumious Bandersnatch
 
Upvote 0

Freodin

Devout believer in a theologically different God
Mar 9, 2002
15,713
3,762
Germany, Bavaria, Middle Franconia
Visit site
✟267,781.00
Faith
Atheist
Frumious Bandersnatch said:
If Drotar ever tangled with a bighorn ram or even a domestic ram that was feeling cranky he might not think they were so defenseless, that is if he survived the experience with no more than a few broken bones.

The Frumious Bandersnatch

Having had experiences with such a ram myself, I can only second that.

The "fluffy littly bah-bah sheep" image is not very realistic.
 
Upvote 0
D

Drotar

Guest
Question:

Would 10,000 years really have that big an impact though?

I mean, right now all they can do is eat and mate. They need to be led to relieve themselves in different areas so that they don't eat the same grass they do their business in.

I would think that it would take much longer to stupidify an animal. 10,000 years doesn't seem long enough. TTYL Jesus loves you!
 
Upvote 0